that said, this is the OpenJPA project, and no matter what the state
of the infra move, anything that this group does now is independent
and disconnected from the incuabtor
On May 19, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
+1 -- assuming the code is ready to go, I agree that it's a good
all sorted out, and then do a 1.0?
-Patrick
On 5/20/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that said, this is the OpenJPA project, and no matter what the state
of the infra move, anything that this group does now is independent
and disconnected from the incuabtor
On May 19, 2007, at 10
:
Is this a combination of Gavin King and Mike Keith, or something
even more
scary?
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 7 May 2007 12:53 p.m.
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate from Incubation
On May 6, 2007, at 10:58 AM
On May 6, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
ps -- Geir, even Google doesn't know what a Gavindakeith is. ;)
Oh, come on. Has anyone figured this out yet? :)
geir
persistence spec that pops up.
Said another way, if this project decides to implement JDO, should
it have to go into another TLP or a sub project?
-dain
On May 4, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
+1
Only comment is that we might consider narrowing the scope a tiny
bit, saying
Gavindakeith
geir
On May 4, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Phill Moran wrote:
Here are two quickly made up thoughts (Google shows no one is using
them at the
moment in open source)
Persius sounds a little like persistence, and is a good old name
I was thinking North Sea - Thinking association with
]
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin Sutter[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Abe White
Most importantly, Patrick is buying...
geir
On Mar 19, 2007, at 9:09 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
Is anyone going to be there? I'll be at the first annual TSSJS OpenJPA
drinks night; hopefully, I'll not be drinking alone
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:30 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:27 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 2/13/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pointing people at the page is good, but doesn't solve the problem.
i was a little confused about which problem you needed
On Feb 12, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
Dain-
I've been working on the TCK certification for OpenJPA. The terms
of Sun's TCK license dictate that I can't discuss the details with
any people who haven't signed Apache's NDA (see http://
www.apache.org/jcp/), but I can say
+1
On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one
from https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/
javax.persistence/jars/persistence-api-1.0.jar) is not actually the
final version of the spec: there are
Abe White wrote:
Why not add a way to clear the cluster cache?
Any developer is free to do so.
Ah - I didn't know if there was some architectural impediment.
geir
quick question - is anything different in this then the last?
geir
Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
OpenJPA People-
The final tally of the vote is:
+1 votes:
Marc Prud'hommeaux
Kevin Sutter
Craig Russell
Patrick Linskey
0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 0
Since we've exceeded the required minimum of
and documentation
Eddie O'Neil wrote:
FWIW, I'm +1 on the bits (though late) but +0 on the release as we
need to get the IP stuff taken care of.
Patrick, do you recall who from BEA signed the code grant agreement?
Eddie
On 11/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quick question
, it is added :)
On Nov 15, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Isn't there a +1 in the phrase add my +1 vote please? :)
Thanks
Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
Geir-
You never actually said +1, so I didn't include you in the tally.
I'll re-post the vote result with your +1 added, though
why are these zip files in the m2 repo? I thought that was just for
jars and such?
geir
Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
OpenJPA People-
In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases ,
I'd like to take a third
Magnusson Jr. wrote:
why are these zip files in the m2 repo? I thought that was just for
jars and such?
geir
Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
OpenJPA People-
In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
, I'd like
, at 3:40 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Probably. But how often do you edit issues, rather than just comment
or such?
Maybe we need a better index in the DB?
Patrick Linskey wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to dial down (or just remove) the 'Assign To' field in
the jira issue edit pages? It takes
:02 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
LOL. Yes, it's fixed...
Craig L Russell wrote:
I don't know why the assign to field has to list all 1 jira
users. Couldn't it just list the people who are allowed to be
assigned issues? IIRC, only developers in the openjpa project are
allowed
Probably. But how often do you edit issues, rather than just comment or
such?
Maybe we need a better index in the DB?
Patrick Linskey wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to dial down (or just remove) the 'Assign To' field in
the jira issue edit pages? It takes *forever* (well, not quite, but
oh, figured it out
All users were possible to assign to.
Fixed.
Patrick Linskey wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to dial down (or just remove) the 'Assign To' field in
the jira issue edit pages? It takes *forever* (well, not quite, but
nearly) to load any of the edit pages, since the page has to
is on the dev@geronimo.apache.org list
geir
Thanks,
Craig
On Oct 28, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
When can Geronimo ship an upgrade to JTA 1.1 that we can use and
compile with 1.3?
You need 1.3? Cool.
geir
( I thought you just voted to abandon 1.3
Craig L Russell wrote:
Q. Is there an open source version of the jar available?
A. Not yet. Since this is a specification jar, only a Java EE 5
compliant application server can publish a production-ready version of
the jar. There are not yet any open source Java EE 5 compliant
application
Craig L Russell wrote:
dependency
groupIdjavax.transaction/groupId
artifactIdtransaction-api/artifactId
version1.1/version
/dependency
I've often wondered what will happen with respect to groupId namespace
management as the use of maven
implementation. Would that
be ok, or just not add value?
Craig
On Oct 29, 2006, at 6:55 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Q. Is there an open source version of the jar available?
A. Not yet. Since this is a specification jar, only a Java EE 5
compliant application server
Craig L Russell wrote:
When can Geronimo ship an upgrade to JTA 1.1 that we can use and compile
with 1.3?
You need 1.3? Cool.
geir
( I thought you just voted to abandon 1.3)
These are goodness that I think OpenJPA can use.
Craig
On Oct 27, 2006, at 8:24 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Geir,
On Oct 28, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
When can Geronimo ship an upgrade to JTA 1.1 that we can use and
compile with 1.3?
You need 1.3? Cool.
I'm speaking for the community, of which OpenJPA is one and Apache JDO
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Geir,
On Jun 15, 2006, at 8:33 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Indeed. And I believe that the released Persistence class is different
from the Geronimo implementation (and nothing against the Geronimo folks
but I'd rather use the glassfish
Patrick Linskey wrote:
You never included legal gibberish in your email before
joining BEA - how hard did you push there to not have your
email client send it w/ ever mail? :)
*I* actually still don't include legal gibberish -- it's the BEA servers
that add that information. And FWIW,
O Codeo, Codeo! wherefore art thou Codeo?
Deny thy license and refuse thy branding;
Or, if thou wilt not, be but sworn my openness,
And I'll no longer be proprietary...
geir
Abe White wrote:
Consistency is good. I look forward to helping out. By the way, it
might be good to take a look at the OpenJPA coding guidelines at
http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ which I made up (based on the
Geronimo standards. The guidelines can be changed to suit our project,
but
There are, but I've never seen them used by an individual project and
we're also careful about predictable load (although i wouldn't think
this would be too bad).
I assume though that anyone that is a committer would Do The Right Thing
anyway...
geir
Patrick Linskey wrote:
One suggestion
32 matches
Mail list logo
