Am Freitag, 13. Juli 2007 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> but note that the 1.4.4 client release on Linux only supports Linux
> kernels up through (IIRC) 2.6.20.
1.4.4/2.6.21.x also worked fine for me.
> Later kernels will require the upcoming
> 1.4.5 release.
Ah, that will then solve my compilation i
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
Which version should I consider using, the latest version that the
download link leads (1.4.x) to or the version that the windows download
leads to (1.5.x)?
I'd suggest using the version the windows download link leads to on
windows, and the latest
"Lundgren, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lost that information in a cut and paste. Opps. I was able to get the
> code to compile on suse by removing some extra ifdefs from the lines 115
> and 460 in the file:
> openafs-1.5.21/src/libafs/MODLOAD-2.6.16.27-0.9-default-SP/osi_vfsops.c
> I
> > Now for the fun questions. Is the windows client suitable for a
> > production environment?
>
> Yes, absolutely. The Windows client is, in fact, arguably
> the best of all of the clients at the moment in terms of
> stability, although it has some oddities of implementation
> that we ho
Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
> Now for the fun questions. Is the windows client suitable for a
> production environment?
yes
> The windows machines will in turn be serving
> data to multiple clients. (A proprietary data server that only runs on
> windows will be feeding the data off box, but the da
"Lundgren, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now for the fun questions. Is the windows client suitable for a
> production environment?
Yes, absolutely. The Windows client is, in fact, arguably the best of all
of the clients at the moment in terms of stability, although it has some
oddities
I looking for a production ready distributed file system.
I learned about AFS about 10 years ago in college, but this is the first
time I have been able to try and use it.
I need to set up several linux servers that will provide data to both
linux and windows 2003 client platforms. I have read
Frank,
I use ext3 with noatime for vice partitions and try to limit servers to
less than 2 TB per server for servers housing research data and .5 TB per
server for servers housing home volumes. This has worked well so far.
Outside AFS, I use xfs for filesystems over 2 TB, but as I said, I
cu
Hi,
while compiling the OpenAFS kernel module for the latest Linux kernel, I get
the following error (on Gentoo):
CC
[M]
/gentoo/build/net-fs/openafs-kernel-1.4.4/work/openafs-1.4.4/src/libafs/MODLOAD-2.6.22.1-SP/rx_kmutex.o
/gentoo/build/net-fs/openafs-kernel-1.4.4/work/openafs-1.4.4/src/l
On Jul 13, 2007, at 16:58, Russ Allbery wrote:
Frank Burkhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'll take the chance to ask everyone about their filesystem
preferences
for (namei-) AFS data partitions. I'm especially interested in things
like "I used XYfs but moved to YZfs because of XX". Please
Frank Burkhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll take the chance to ask everyone about their filesystem preferences
> for (namei-) AFS data partitions. I'm especially interested in things
> like "I used XYfs but moved to YZfs because of XX". Please write about
> non-linux servers filesystem pref
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 04:46:29PM -0400, Steven Jenkins wrote:
> * What is the underlying filesystem? what features do you have enabled? (
> e.g., the output of dumpe2fs -h or equivalent on your system)
Ok ... I replaced my beloved XFS by reiserfs (3), created a volume
containing 19 f
12 matches
Mail list logo
