Re: Problem with constraint_binding

2017-03-17 Thread Bert Verhees
Thanks Peter, I must have missed it. blush blush (missing my regular workstation/email client) It is indeed the solution. Sorry for that Best regards Bert On 17-03-17 14:42, Peter Gummer wrote: On 17 Mar 2017, at 22:39, Bert Verhees wrote: The several countries have independent organizat

Re: Problem with constraint_binding

2017-03-17 Thread Peter Gummer
On 17 Mar 2017, at 22:39, Bert Verhees wrote: > > The several countries have independent organizations, and the overall > organization cannot enforce a common terminology. There are two terminologies > in this case, and those two terminologies cannot be mapped easily, because > the granularity

Re: Problem with constraint_binding

2017-03-17 Thread Bert Verhees
It is a customer requirement. It is a real life problem. It is not very helpful to me to have discussions about the good, bad or ugly of solutions. But, of course, go ahead for your own interests. It is about an international organization which processes data from several countries. The sev

Re: Problem with constraint_binding

2017-03-17 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:43:33AM +0100, GF wrote: > Any item in an archetype potentially has: > - an ad-hoc, locally defined, display name > - an official canonical name in a specific language domain > - and, in order to disambiguate it, an unique code in > - a specific terminology/classificatio

Re: Problem with constraint_binding

2017-03-17 Thread GF
Yes. Any item in an archetype potentially has: - an ad-hoc, locally defined, display name - an official canonical name in a specific language domain - and, in order to disambiguate it, an unique code in - a specific terminology/classification domain Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl