On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:43:33AM +0100, GF wrote:
> Any item in an archetype potentially has:
> - an ad-hoc, locally defined, display name
> - an official canonical name in a specific language domain
> - and, in order to disambiguate it, an unique code in
> - a specific terminology/classification domain
Hence the notion that the "name" in*side* the terminology
domain could be discussed to be ignored in the context of
Bert's question such that it becomes
user-level name
code from domain A
code from domain B
in which
name from domain A/B/...
doesn't occur which means
user-level name
IS TO BE mapped at any rate, typically in a way where
user-level name in clinical artifacts isn't directly
associated with particular codes but rather a mapping
"relation" (of whatever kind) is used.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
