discussing and
> consensus over the whole world for a set of archetypes, then there is not
> much flexibility left.
> This can work very good for the archetypes which are in CKM, but all those
> new devices, all those new datatypes, all this new protocols, which cannot
> wait for these
Hi Bert,
Let me try to keep it brief: you seem to suggest breaking the openEHR
methodology. If you allow downstream actors (clinical systems, guided by
their users) create archetypes without going through the methodology, i.e.
creating, discussing, reviewing archetypes, you'll end up with computab
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 2:35 PM, GF wrote:
>
>
> Gerard Freriks
> +31 620347088 <+31%206%2020347088>
> gf...@luna.nl
>
> Kattensingel 20
> 2801 CA Gouda
> the Netherlands
>
> On 28 Feb 2018, at 14:42, Seref Arikan
> wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
&g
thing here :)
All the best
Seref
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Seref Arikan <
serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> The original question is talking about 'threshold's changing in time.
> Would not using reference ranges may make things complicated
Hi Tom,
The original question is talking about 'threshold's changing in time. Would
not using reference ranges may make things complicated during
implementation with the changing threshold requirement?
First: if the threshold is changing with respect to all instances of a
particular composition (
th
> > Bayesian Belief Networks for clinical decision support
> >
> > One of my most persistent PhD students, Seref Arikan, has published his
> > ground-breaking PhD thesis on the UCL online repository.
> >
> > A fuller announcement and link has been posted in the
i
>
> Hildegard Franke
> Chief Operations Officer
>
>
>
> mobile: +44 (0)7932 502655 <+44%207932%20502655>
> landline: +44 (0)1536 414994 <+44%201536%20414994>
> skype: hild5559
> twitter: @hildegardfranke
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/hildegardfrank
ram, David
> *Sent:* den 27 oktober 2017 13:28
> *To:* For openEHR clinical discussions (openehr-clinical@lists.openehr.org)
> ; For openEHR technical discussions <
> openehr-techni...@lists.openehr.org>
> *Subject:*
>
> *An implementation focused evaluation of openEHR an
Hi Pablo,
I am not a clinician but as an implementer I see the benefits of less
specific archetypes quite often. The fundamental role of archetypes is
reuse. It is so by design and templates solve the problem of composition
(in the object oriented sense, not the RM type).
I think the rule I try t
(apologies if you receive this twice)
Hi Heather,
I'd humbly advice against making Z-Score an attribute for every quantity
data.
The first reason is that Z-Score is a meaningful metric for the assumption
of normality, that is the possible values of the numeric quantity
demonstrate a particular
Hi Erik,
Good work & well done. I personally find tutorial style approach as the
most efficient way of learning anything, including openEHR. The method
works for teaching as well, so I think your P.p.s is a good idea.
All the best
Seref
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Erik Sundvall wrote:
> Th
Hi Ralph,
The capabilities you have at your disposal at the point in which you have
the model ready is specific to implementation. Some implementations
provide/require less, some provide/require more. But you have template data
objects, GDL, storage, XML serialisation, validation (not in this stric
I would like to congratulate the authors for the amount of effort they’ve
put into this paper. It is rarely the case that someone looks at such an
important aspect of implementing openEHR with such a level of commitment.
That being said, I think this study lacks a major aspect and it is probably
That 'creative' approach popped up in my mind as well :) I just was not
sure if it would trigger some sort of spam/bogus check (I'd certainly put
one in place...)
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Roger Erens wrote:
> And you can sign up multiple times using your e-mail accounts for work,
> gma
I don't think we can answer them before the site is approved.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Ian McNicoll wrote:
> Thanks Bert,
>
> Completely agree. It will take only a few moments of your time but will
> act as a great resource for the whole community.
>
> Your openEHR Stack Exchange needs
To all who are helping with this: there are questions with upvotes > 10. I
think this is a waste of your upvotes; we need to get as many as possible
to 10, upvoting beyond 10 does not help with our goal of creating an
openEHR area.
Also, some of the questions do not comply with Q&A format; generic
Maybe I'm losing some clinical context by adopting a data view of the
setting but would not a problem oriented record be a 'view' on clinical
data ? The clinical problem is obviously context dependant (cancer,
diabetes etc) so this sounds like a higher order view on top of clinical
data to me. I'd
Hi Silje,
Thanks for noting this. I'll resist the urge to write a long, really long
response and just say that I think you're right. This does not sound right
(the understatement of the year for 2014 so far...)
I'll leave the details to members of openEHR who regularly advice CIMI...
Best regards
Hi Ian,
Personally I think V0 has significant costs in exchange for not so
significant benefits. Semver compatibility would be nice, but nice is not
worth the implementation cost for parser etc here. I don't know if V0
support would break things deep down in actual openEHR implementations but
even
Erik,
Congrats, it must feel really nice to be able to reach this point. Best of
luck for the defense :)
Best regards
Seref
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Erik Sundvall wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My thesis entitled "Scalability and Semantic Sustainability in Electronic
> Health Record Systems" is now
Hi Bert,
I'm trying to get my head around your requirements. I can't say I've
clearly got it, but let me try to reply via inline comments.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Bert Verhees wrote:
> Op 09-07-2012 17:15, Seref Arikan schreef:
>
> implementation, that wo
Hi Bert,
Take a look at this as a reference:
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/spec/Archetype+Query+Language+Description#ArchetypeQueryLanguageDescription-AQLidentifiedpaths
Regarding your question, I think the current specification for AQL does not
discuss what would happen if an abstract type
Yahoo groups also seem to suffer from the urge for improving my sex life,
while wearing a fake rolex, as I travel to bank to help some guy inherit
his late father's 987 bazillion dollars...
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Beale <
thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> wrote:
> On 23/01/2
in Web tools?
>
> Best regards,
> Shinji
>
> 2011/12/22 Seref Arikan :
> > Greetings,
> > I would like to get the opinion of clinical modelling community about the
> > requirement of being online.
> > This is not a question about using web based tools. Even i
Greetings,
I would like to get the opinion of clinical modelling community about the
requirement of being online.
This is not a question about using web based tools. Even if you're using a
modelling tool that does not require a browser, would it be a problem for
you if the tool required that you ar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_object
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:36 PM, S JAGANNATHAN
wrote:
> If that is the case. then there really is no need for Instruction
> separately as such.
> The 'what' can be specified and the context may be obtained by applying
> attributes such as for a procedure-
would it be wrong to say instruction = request; action = response ?
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Thomas Beale <
thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> wrote:
>
> Instruction defines what Activities should be performed. Actions record
> the execution of those activities, which might not be exac
Hi Peter,
We may be able to replace Eiffel Vision with something else, but that
is the next step of experiments, and will take a long discussion
before we get started with it. Thanks for the explanation!
Cheers
Seref
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Peter Gummer
wrote:
> Seref Arikan wr
Hi Tom,
Thanks for all the hard work. I'll give it a spin under Linux and let you
know how it goes.
If I had a Mac (cough), I'd do the same for the sugar coated BSD ;)
Regards
Seref
On 9 Sep 2011, at 01:00, Thomas Beale
wrote:
A new beta release of the ADL 1.5 Workbench is now available
here<
Thanks Tom,
The reworded rule is what I was asking for actually: something in the
spec that sets the rule for this particular combination of values.
Cheers
Seref
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Thomas Beale
wrote:
> On 02/08/2011 13:13, Sebastian Garde wrote:
>
> Hi Seref,
>
> interesting, I th
y cannot both have zero instances, but you can
> choose, and a cardinality of >=1 and member elements with occurrence >=
> 0 is the way to express this choice I believe.
>
> Sebastian
>
> On 02.08.2011 12:46, Seref Arikan wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> Am I suffering from
Greetings,
Am I suffering from acute caffeine deficiency syndrome (just made it
up) or is there a problem with the occurrences of event and
interval_events in the blood pressure archetype?
In the published blood pressure archetype in the CKM, HISTORY[at0001]
has events with cardinality {1..*; unord
Greetings,
Minor point about one of the projects; Opereffa, and what it is trying to do.
To serve the community spirit of the openEHR foundation, I've put a
lot of functionality into Opereffa, which would not be necessary for
the real purpose it was built for: my PhD work.
Due to well known, and re
nicoll
> ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com
>
> Clinical analyst,?Ocean Informatics, UK
> openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor www.openehr.org/knowledge
> Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
> BCS Primary Health Care ?www.phcsg.org
>
>
>
>
> On 17 February 201
question based on other clinical data, but
for the moment I have not given up on using this data set.
Best Regards
Seref Arikan
ng document somewhere except your weblog?
> I want to cite this in an article.
>
> Best Regards
> Pariya
>
> MSc; PhD Candidate
> Department of Computing Science and Engineering
> Chalmers University of Technology
> http://www.chalmers.se/cse/EN/people/kashfi-hajar
>
>
&
Hi Pablo,
A very useful insight into the issues indeed. This is one topic that may end
up being a quite long discussion, but I feel it is a topic that is worth
laying out, not only today, but every couple of years or so, to see where we
are.
I'll provide my personal views here. openEHR is not a sm
I for one, would like to thank you for asking this question.It made me
scratch my head when I first saw `rubric` being used for terminology item
names in NCI's terminology server :)
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:18 PM, ognian.pishev <
ognian.pishev at oceaninformatics.com> wrote:
> I guess you could
Hi Shinji and everyone,
So there are sessions for implementation tips, and there is one for openEHR
developers? Do we know who is doing which? :)
Best Regards
Seref
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 7:39 AM, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote:
> Hi Heather,
>
> I found developers' workshop in Monday 13 Sep, Session
Thanks Carol,
We've been waiting for this one for quite some time.
Kind regards
Seref
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Dra Carola Hullin Lucay Cossio <
carolhullin at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> The International Health Terminology Standards Development
> Organisation announced today
Fantastic news Rong! Congratulations :)
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Zanifa Omary wrote:
> Congratulations Rong, that's an achievement.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Rong Chen wrote:
>
>> Thank you all! =)
>>
>> I will definitely continue my work in the openEHR world wit
Even if this is slightly off topic considering the original post that
started this topic, I'd like to suggest another alternative to
streaming/phone calls etc.
http://videolectures.net/ is a fantastic source of information with video
recordings of key academic events. Instead of streaming which wou
Dear all,
I'd like to express my concerns about practical outcomes of suggested
changes, changes based on potential benefits. I'd appreciate your input
about the use cases we are discussing just to make sure that I get this
right.
First of all, translation of openEHR documentation to other language
Dear members of the list,
I'd like share with you an interesting lawsuit, which you may find
interesting. It is not directly related to focus of this group, and but
regarding current work around licencing issues of archetypes, the future may
hold some nasty surprizes, especially when people realize
Thanks Tim,
I've been using an older version of Ocean's archetype editor, will fix it.
Cheers
Seref
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > >Announcement of the release of Opereffa by the openEHR
> > > Foundation
> >
Hi Heather,
As far as I can see, the technology that has been introduced into our lives
in the last 10 years have the following effects in clinical domain:
Internet: clinicians can now reach other clinicians at the other side of the
world and disagree with them.
Web 2.0: Clinicians can now disagre
icant enough,we
will be sharing it as an open source application with the community. I hope
I'll be able to share with you our progress as we move forward.
Best Regards
Seref Arikan
ps: Thanks Koray, hope you are fine out there :)
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Hugh Leslie <
h
Hi,
In section 5.3.5.1 of Adl spec 1.5, draft 4, examples to both single and
multi valued attributes are given within the context of subtype constraints.
It is explicitly stated in the doc that lack of occurrence in a single
valued attribute where multiple options are given (with different node id
Don't worry Thomas, if something goes a little bit wrong in the next few
days at CERN, we can all unite in an unprecented level of harmony in a nice
little black hole.
Of course, the issue about being close to or far away from each other in a
black hole is an important one, but I have the feeling
/healthnetwork/resources/summary_report_on_nhin_Prototype_architectures.pdf
Best Regards
Seref Arikan
50 matches
Mail list logo
