need a test framework).
Imagine that dreaded generic labtest archetype in the other message, I
wrote today.
How convenient would maintainability become if specializations where
really and life-inherited from parent archetypes?
Would we need a big part of the LOINC-database of specialized labtest
I can further constraint that by specifying
>> which specific types can be used, to avoid the possibility of allowing any
>> datavalue to be there. The problem I found is that after setting the
>> allowed datavalues, I can't set constraints for them, e.g. if I specify
>> Coded
e ADLs/OPTs from Brazil with alternatives, and I don't know
> if they are using another AE/TD or just setting the constraints by hand.
> For example a problem status archetypes has this which I can't reproduce in
> the Ocean's AE:
> >
> > ELEMENT[a
ng another AE/TD or just setting the constraints by hand. For
> example a problem status archetypes has this which I can't reproduce in the
> Ocean's AE:
>
> ELEMENT[at0082] occurrences matches {0..*} matches {--
> Unspecified
> value ma
archetypes has this which I can't reproduce in the
Ocean's AE:
ELEMENT[at0082] occurrences matches {0..*} matches {--
Unspecified
value matches {
DV_TEXT matches {*}
DV_BOOLEAN matches {
value matches {True
ay create a PERSISTENT Template to model i.e. Social
> Summary, Previous Diseases. We will post some specifications/descriptions
> on this soon.
>
>
>
> /Bjørn
>
>
>
>
>
> *Fra:* openEHR-technical [mailto:
> openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] *På vegne av* Ian
Emne: Re: Context in persistent COMPOSITION archetypes?
Hi Silje,
Can you tell us more about the background? Are you trying to provide the model
for the message, or to store the data when it is received (or both)?
Where does the data come from and how is it managed / curated? Does it come
from
position, and a coded text element to hold the code for the type of
> entry.
>
>
>
> Is there a better way of achieving what we need to do here?
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
> *Silje Ljosland Bakke*
>
>
>
> Information Architect, RN
>
> Coordinator, National Ed
Hi everyone,
Seeking advice from the broader community regarding an important modelling
issue...
At present the Medication Order (INSTRUCTION.medication) archetype is
undergoing community review.
The primary author has proposed that the scope include IV and other parenteral
fluid
I'm reviewing the current version of the specs and remembered an issue we had
in the past about this (check the bold text)
8.2.5.7. Relationship to Archetypes
Much of the semantics of particular Instructions and Actions derive
from archetypes. Currently, archetypes are used to define two
Hi, could you please implement such a function?
--
Regards, Dmitry
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Hi Peter, it best suits my needs.
>> Hi, could you please implement such a function?
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I’m not sure if this helps, but if you already have a local directory of ADL
> archetypes then you can run the Ocean Archetype Editor in batch-processing
> mode from the c
Dmitry Baranov <barano...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
> Hi, could you please implement such a function?
Hi Dmitry,
I’m not sure if this helps, but if you already have a local directory of ADL
archetypes then you can run the Ocean Archetype Editor in batch-processing mode
from the
implement such a function?
Hi Dmitry,
I’m not sure if this helps, but if you already have a local directory of ADL
archetypes then you can run the Ocean Archetype Editor in batch-processing mode
from the command line to export them as XML.
--
*Dr. Sebastian Garde*
/Dr. sc. hum., Dipl.-Inform
Hi Sebastian
I've tested a dozen or so archetypes from various CKMs, (some with and
some without), and all the XML downloads verify against the schema.
Thanks very much for the fix
Dave Barnet
From: Sebastian Garde [mailto:sebastian.ga...@oceaninformatics.com]
Sent: Tue 08/09/2015 15:33
Can someone help to take me off the list. I have signed into the list and
unsubscribe and still unsuccessful.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Barnet David (HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE
INFORMATION CENTRE) <david.bar...@hscic.gov.uk> wrote:
> I have a question about the XML schema for archety
@lists.openehr.org;Subject:A question about the XML schema for
version 1.4 archetypesI have a question about the XML schema for archetypes
based on ADL version 1.4 The set of schemas we are using to validate XML
archetype exports are 1.0.1ETC.. The issue we are getting is that
sometimes an archetype has
pth at any the differences a while ago, comparing XML in the
Archetype Editor to XML generated in CKM by the Java XML Serialiser.
All new archetypes now receive a uid as part of their identification
(including on other ckms), but before that pretty much nobody was using
this field, so it may be that w
I have a question about the XML schema for archetypes based on ADL version 1.4
The set of schemas we are using to validate XML archetype exports are 1.0.1
ETC..
The issue we are getting is that sometimes an archetype has a tag. All
those downloaded from our CKM (ckm.hscic.gov.uk) have
rendered. AFAIK,
modelling tools don't provide the visual mindmap.
User interface has nothing to do with archetypes, so you will not find any
information about how to render information on a screen in the openEHR specs. I
did a lot of work around openEHR and UIs, you might find these papers useful
Hi Liron,
If I remember correctly, the free version of linkEHR (LinkEHR Editor
Lite) has a function to render mindmaps from Archetypes. Though, I don't
know if you can get the created mm file.
Here is the link: http://www.linkehr.com/
Best,
Birger
Am 28.05.2015 um 09:39 schrieb pablo
for the archetypes/ templates
via one of the modeling tools ? (for ex the ADL)
2)My goal is to model a system via archetype. For ex: a screen which
present a patient overview. The screen represent data and does not contain any
form. I couldn’t find any document which explain how to deign/represent
.
From: liron_ka...@hotmail.com
To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: openEHR archetypes and views
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 13:01:37 +
Hello,
I am in the learning process of openEHR as part of my thesis work at Orebro
university, Sweden, and I would like to ask quite simple
my advice from LOINC/regenstrief is that it does apply
Grahame
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Thomas Beale
thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com wrote:
Something that has become clear in CIMI, and will affect openEHR, 13606
and most likely any archetype developer is that acknowledgements
-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On
Behalf Of Grahame Grieve
Sent: Thursday, 13 November 2014 8:07 PM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Cc: Openehr-Technical
Subject: Re: Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights?
my advice from LOINC/regenstrief is that it does apply
Grahame
: Openehr-Technical
Subject: Re: Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights?
my advice from LOINC/regenstrief is that it does apply
Grahame
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Thomas Beale
thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com wrote:
Something that has become clear
So we all would probably benefit from creating some copy and paste
examples for common 3rd party attribution that can be easily
incorporated into archetypes / resources.
Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
office +44 (0)1536 414 994
fax +44 (0)1536 516317
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
skype ianmcnicoll
ian.mcnicoll
Hi David,
licence is taken care of in the model as it is today
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/download/attachments/45645905/AOM_archetype_package.png?version=2modificationDate=1412032298000api=v2.
Note that it is currently spelt in international English, not US English
('license', which is only
wonder about the idea of repository-level attribution but in
practice the archetypes will often be disconnected and shared in local
repositories etc, so I suspect we are stuck with attribution for each
archetype.
I have looked at Thomas's proposal on the wiki and now think that is
probably
On 13/11/2014 10:02, Heather Leslie wrote:
I've had discussions with IHTSDO about needing a formal statement about SCT
that should be placed in archetypes and this will be identical to that which
they are currently working on with CIMI.
Regards
Heather
The main thing we need to do
wrote:
I've had discussions with IHTSDO about needing a formal statement about
SCT that should be placed in archetypes and this will be identical to that
which they are currently working on with CIMI.
Regards
Heather
The main thing we need to do with this in my view is put most
Atalag
Sent: Tuesday, 16 September 2014 10:32 p.m.
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: RE: How to model relationship between archetypes?
Hi Li Wang,
In my opinion what you want is an ability to relate instances of data not
individual archetypes themselves. I can see a couple things
expect to be
slotted in here but others (including V2 versions are allowed).
it might be worth noting that slots and external references (i.e. direct
references to archetypes, without the slot) have identifiers, like all
nodes, in ADL/AOM 1.5, and also that external references are used
problems of
using current archetypes.
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
--
Dr Ian McNicoll
office / fax +44(0)141 560 4657
mobile
Hi,
While reviewing CKM archetypes we found that slots are usually
pointing to other v1 archetypes.
Shouldn't archetype slots point to any version of the included
archetypes and not a single archetype? Shouldn't be Templates the ones
pointing to an specific archetype?
This is also true even
- thomas
On 25/09/2014 12:06, Diego Bosc? wrote:
Hi,
While reviewing CKM archetypes we found that slots are usually
pointing to other v1 archetypes.
Shouldn't archetype slots point to any version of the included
archetypes and not a single archetype? Shouldn't be Templates the ones
pointing
I can agree you with the 'absolute' references, but I still think that
slots to specialized archetypes are not well defined as they are
currently defined:
If you want to say that all children from a .v3 archetype are allowed
you cannot say openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION\.respiration(-[a-zA-Z0-9_]+)*\.v3
-OBSERVATION.respiration.v1
which would mean 'any child of openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.respiration.v1,
or any minor version of openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.respiration.v1, or
openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.respiration.v1 itself'. So then it doesn't
matter what versions the child archetypes are - if they refer to
openEHR
I thought we would convert to this system some years ago, but people seem to
be happy with the current system for now. It won't work forever though
We agree on this. We just must be aware of the potential problems of
using current archetypes.
Hi,
I put some test archetypes in this github
repository:?https://github.com/daowangli/archetype_test.git
Please help to review for some issues:
1. I select archetypes in CKM and add new attributes according to my
requirements, do?these new attributes belong to the proper archetypes?
2. I use
Hi,
I'm try to understand how to model relationship between archetypes. For
example, there are two archetypes in CKM,
openEHR-EHR-INSTRUCTION.request-lab_test.v1 and
openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.lab_test.v1
My question is, how to express the relationship that
openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.lab_test.v1
openEHR Reference Model has a Link class that is suitable to your
needs. You can find more info about it in the EHR IM document from
the openEHR specifications
2014-09-11 3:41 GMT+02:00 Li Wang daowangli at gmail.com:
Hi,
I'm try to understand how to model relationship between archetypes
a template that brings these two separate archetypes together
with any additional information you might need to capture.
Hope this helps
All the best
Athanasios Anastasiou
On 11/09/2014 02:41, Li Wang wrote:
Hi,
I'm try to understand how to model relationship between archetypes. For
example
Thanks a lot!?
LINK can solve my problems very well. But I still have some questions between
using LINK and templates.
1. Does LINK require the linking attributes to be explicitly defined in
archetypes? For example, should one more LINK typed attribute be added under
links attribute
.
Is that clear enough?
In programming language, a possible implementation I think may be that there
are two classes, lab-test-request and lab-test-result, lab-test-result has an
attribute stores id of lab-test-request instances to hold the relationship
between these two classes.
Does use LINK in archetypes
case is that you don't
need a template that brings the archetypes together. What you can do is
create (or re-use) an archetype for your INSTRUCTION. This will have its
own lifetime within the EHR. Furthermore, you can create (or re-use)
another archetype for your OBSERVATION that will contain
the request and vice versa.
My perception from the way you describe this use case is that you don't
need a template that brings the archetypes together. What you can do is
create (or re-use) an archetype for your INSTRUCTION. This will have its
own lifetime within the EHR. Furthermore, you can
I have created a wiki page
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/spec/ADL+1.5+-+where+to+define+value+sets
to describe a possibly radical idea about how we define value sets (like
body position etc) in archetypes.
all feedback welcome.
- thomas
-- next part --
An HTML
in archetypes:
(using openEHR terminology biniding terminology) OBJECT bindings would
be term bindings of value sets, VALUE SET bindings would be assignment
of at-codes to value sets. Then it's just figuring out how those kinds
of bindings are to be used and explained to archetype users...
I see
+value+setsto
describe a possibly radical idea about how we define value sets (like
body position etc) in archetypes.
all feedback welcome.
- thomas
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
http
of
implementing the proposed CIMI terminology binding model in archetypes:
(using openEHR terminology biniding terminology) OBJECT bindings would
be term bindings of value sets, VALUE SET bindings would be assignment
of at-codes to value sets. Then it's just figuring out how those kinds
of bindings
On 14/01/2014 11:07, Diego Bosc? wrote:
I like the idea, we were already exploring something similar to this
for intra-archetype semantic relationships.
I have two questions/suggestions:
-once the vs is intoduced, do we still need to specify it as
local. Wouldn't be always be local
: ann.wright...@wales.nhs.uk
To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:30:00 +
Subject: RE: Instruction archetypes and overlaping nodes with
INSTRUCTION.narrative
Hi Pablo ?
Yes, all this can be relevant, however...
My main point
pazospablo
at hotmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm reviewing archetypes for a project. Looking at referral request
archetype on the CKM, there are some nodes (Reason for request Reason
description) that seems to match the semantics of INSTRUCTION.narrative
property.
Using that archetype to generate
I knew that question was coming ;-)
Firstly, how would you detect an inconsistency? It can only be done by a
human being, or else a quite sophisticated piece of software. Now, what
does it mean if there is a difference?
Firstly they are not quite 'duplicates'. The narrative is a directive to
: Instruction archetypes and overlaping nodes with
INSTRUCTION.narrative
On 29/10/2013 16:28, Dr Ed Hammond, Ph.D. wrote:
As a point of interest, the required narrative section in CCD was an interim
step because we (US) still have a number of sites that cannot accommodate
structured data. In my
: trying to flat archetypes
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:19:52 -0300
Hi Rong,
I was revisiting the specs :)I'm working with ADL 1.4, trying to implement a
suggestion from Thomas: to flat archetype slots preserving the original node
ids.To do so, I need to use the archetype id and the node id to avoid
Hi Tom, this is an exciting thing. OMG sets the standards for sure...
Cheers,
-koray
From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On
Behalf Of Thomas Beale
Sent: Wednesday, 22 May 2013 10:07 a.m.
To: Openehr-Technical
Subject: Archetypes at OMG
Some
?mne: RE: Archetypes at OMG
Hi Tom, this is an exciting thing. OMG sets the standards for sure...
Cheers,
-koray
From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On
Behalf Of Thomas Beale
Sent: Wednesday, 22 May 2013 10:07 a.m.
To: Openehr-Technical
Subject: Archetypes
Hi all,
I've downloaded a couple of archetypes from the CKM to start playing around
with ADL on PHP :)
I've noticed those archetypes contain the BOM (byte order mark), the weird
characters at the beginning of the ADL.
Shouldn't the ADL files be UTF-8 without BOM?
[0] = ???archetype
Some of you may be interested to note that a new OMG RfP 'Archetype
Modelling Language (AML)' will be under discussion at the June OMG
meeting http://hssp.wikispaces.com/event-2013-06-OMG-Berlin.
- thomas
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
I have uploaded a cleaned up version of the CKM archetypes, which nearly
all compile cleanly in the ADL 1.5 workbench. (The reason why some
cleaning was necessary is because the Workbench compiler is much
stricter and better at checking even 1.4 level semantics than the tools
used to build
!
--Wo
From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org
[mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@openehr.org] On Behalf Of Heath Frankel
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 5:35 AM
To: 'For openEHR technical discussions'
Subject: RE: Building software to convert HL7 v2/v3 messaging into archetypes
templates
From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org
[mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@openehr.org] On Behalf Of David Moner
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:23 PM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: Building software to convert HL7 v2/v3 messaging into archetypes
templates
Hello
...@openehr.org] On Behalf Of Paulo Ferreira
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:13 PM
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: RE: Building software to convert HL7 v2/v3 messaging into archetypes
templates
Hello all,
I'm working on my thesis project, which one of the components is EHRstorage
Hello all,
I'm working on my thesis project, which one of the components is EHRstorage
in a openEHR repository. Since the input is HL7v2.x messages there isthe
necessity of openEHR conversion. I think Heath remembers me, because Heath
andChunlan helps me with this issue. I was capable to assemble
/in/pablopazosgutierrez
Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:12:31 +
Subject: RE: Building software to convert HL7 v2/v3 messaging into archetypes
templates
From: ferreira.rob...@gmail.com
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Hello
model you import into it. We have worked with archetypes for
openEHR, EN13606, HL7 CDA, CDISC ODM, MML and many others.
- It is a data transformation tool based on archetypes. You can use an
archetype and map it to a data source, defining the appropriate
transformation functions and rules
errors without the need for specialised
openEHR validation tools. Although as openEHR experts we benefit from this
process, the advantages for those that are not is huge.
The nice thing about using archetypes to define the schema of the target of
a transform is that you only need to write
Dear All,
I hope this is the right reflector
First of all, thanks to those who developed tools, prepared tutorials, etc.!!
I have spending the last few days playing around with the followings:
* Java Reference Implementation of openEHR
* LiU-Archtype-Editor-0.5.2
*
me too
Bert Verhees :)
Op 3-2-2012 22:37, Chang, Wo L. schreef:
Dear All,
I hope this is the right reflector
First of all, thanks to those who developed tools, prepared tutorials,
etc.!!
I have spending the last few days playing around with the followings:
?Java Reference
will be widely accepted and used.
Cheers,
Stef
Begin doorgestuurd bericht:
Van: Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com
Onderwerp: [openEHR-announce] CIMI group goes with openEHR archetypes UML
profile
Datum: 14 december 2011 10:38:14 GMT+01:00
Aan: openehr-announce openehr-announce
at oceaninformatics.com
Onderwerp: [openEHR-announce] CIMI group goes with openEHR archetypes UML
profile
Datum: 14 december 2011 10:38:14 GMT+01:00
Aan: openehr-announce openehr-announce at openehr.org
[press release from the CIMI group]
The Clinical Information Modeling Initiative is an international
: openehr-technical-boun...@openehr.org
[mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Sato Laura (NHS
CONNECTING FOR HEALTH)
Sent: Friday, 7 October 2011 11:34 PM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: RE: openEHR Archetypes Development
In part in (a slow!) response
From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org
[mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@openehr.org] On Behalf Of Sam Heard
Sent: 10 October 2011 04:25
To: 'For openEHR technical discussions'
Subject: RE: openEHR Archetypes Development
Hi Laura
Thanks for the link. I am finding it very difficult to make
** **
** **
*From:* openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:
openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Sam Heard
*Sent:* 10 October 2011 04:25
*To:* 'For openEHR technical discussions'
*Subject:* RE: openEHR Archetypes Development
** **
Hi Laura
** **
Thanks
LRA Reference Models
From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org
[mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of
rjsea...@gmail.com
Sent: 10 October 2011 12:16
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: openEHR Archetypes Development
Hi Laura,
Thanks for the link. While
at openehr.org
[mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@openehr.org] On Behalf Of Eunice Ab
Sent: 03 June 2011 12:18
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: openEHR Archetypes Development
Dear Laura, Ian
Many thanks for your emails. They have been so helpful .
Laura, I am going to take
to the XSDs
temporarily or better wait for you to modify the serialiser and try to
re-download the archetypes from the CKM?
All the best
Athanasios Anastasiou
On 06/09/2011 09:53, Sebastian Garde wrote:
Hi
CKM is using the XML serialiser of the openEHR Java Reference
implementation
06.09.2011 11:49, schrieb Athanasios Anastasiou:
Hello
Thank you for your response Sebastian.
Is it a small number of changes that i could perhaps apply to the XSDs
temporarily or better wait for you to modify the serialiser and try to
re-download the archetypes from the CKM?
All the best
-download the archetypes from the CKM?
All the best
Athanasios Anastasiou
On 06/09/2011 09:53, Sebastian Garde wrote:
Hi
CKM is using the XML serialiser of the openEHR Java Reference
implementation.
It seems that the serialiser applies a different order to some
elements
than required
Hi
CKM is using the XML serialiser of the openEHR Java Reference
implementation.
It seems that the serialiser applies a different order to some elements
than required by the schema.
Not sure if these were turned around in the xsd at some stage maybe?
While I don't really understand why these
Hi Sebastian,
To my knowledge, no one is maintaining the AOM xml-serialiser from the Java
Reference Project at the moment. So I would appreciate if you could fix it
this time.
Actually the larger issue about xml-serialiser is that it's not relying on a
java XML binding API. This makes it
Hi Rong,
I'm working on this; an AOM to JAXB binding. I'm hoping that I'll be
able to give more details in a couple of weeks.
Regards
Seref
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Rong Chen rong.acode at gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
To my knowledge, no one is maintaining the AOM xml-serialiser
temporarily or better wait for you to modify the serialiser and try to
re-download the archetypes from the CKM?
All the best
Athanasios Anastasiou
On 06/09/2011 09:53, Sebastian Garde wrote:
Hi
CKM is using the XML serialiser of the openEHR Java Reference
implementation.
It seems
Hi,
I have modified the XMLSerialiser code and checked it in, you can
compile it from there if you like.
This will become part of the next minor release for ckm.
Seref: looking forward to the binding!
Cheers
Sebastian
Am 06.09.2011 11:44, schrieb Seref Arikan:
Hi Rong,
I'm working on this;
Thanks, Sebastian!
yes, I also look forward to the new AOM/XML binding component.
Cheers,
Rong
On 6 September 2011 15:45, Sebastian Garde
sebastian.garde at oceaninformatics.com wrote:
Hi,
I have modified the XMLSerialiser code and checked it in, you can compile
it from there if you
demographic archetypes on
CKMhttp://www.openehr.org/knowledge.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by these not being sufficiently flexible?
On the other hand, why these objects do not follow archetype structure?
why they are not inherited from C_DEFINED_OBJECT?
well PERSON etc is ultimately
On 28/08/2011 23:47, Abbas Shojaee wrote:
Dear Thomas
Thank you for your reply. This is exactly my concern, taking some
concepts (e.g. version, demographic etc.) outside of Archetype
perspective, opens room for exceptions to appear, which gradually
makes the design incoherent and
in a single template, which
better reflects the use-case for TB, but we can use all of the same
archetypes for malaria but using a different template.
I have just found the openMRS TB module at
https://wiki.openmrs.org/display/docs/MDR-TB+Module+User+Guide
and will try and find a little time to work
Hi Joaquin
Have a look at www.openehr.org/knowledge. This is the clinical knowledge
manager portal where you can share and download archetypes.
As for the archetypes that you mention, these are at the highest level a
diagnosis which is covered by the diagnosis archetype with terminology
, UK
openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor www.openehr.org/knowledge
Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
BCS Primary Health Care ?www.phcsg.org
On 5 August 2011 10:47, Hugh Leslie hugh.leslie at oceaninformatics.com wrote:
oops - got iphoned.? I meant aggregating archetypes (not aggravating
://openehr.jp/news/9
2011/8/5 Blaya, Joaquin Andres joaquin_blaya at hms.harvard.edu:
Thank you for all of the responses. ?I have forwarded them to the OpenMRS
developer team. ?A couple of other questions arose that I was hoping to get
cleared up.
1. Are there tools or a portal for archetypes
do not want to put these archetypes , developed for a
particular project, up on to CKM until we have at least established
that they are appropriate for sharing to a wider audience.
We will get there honest.
Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
office +44 (0)1536 414 994
fax +44 (0)1536 516317
mobile +44 (0)775
Hi Ian,
The repository Diego pointed out seems the Cambodian TB archetypes.
Kong Saran is an lead of this project.
2011/8/5 Ian McNicoll Ian.McNicoll at oceaninformatics.com:
Hi Shinji,
Are the Cambodian TB archetypes visible or downloadable anywhere?
The tension in any archetype
Thanks Shinji,
The archetypes that Diego mentioned as being missing from CKM look to
me very much like an extensive set that were developed as a part of an
English NHS project some years ago. Many of the current CKM archetypes
come from the same source, but have been subsequently re-modelled
Thank you for all of the responses. I have forwarded them to the OpenMRS
developer team. A couple of other questions arose that I was hoping to get
cleared up.
1. Are there tools or a portal for archetypes where different users can share
their archetypes?
2. Have archetypes for Tuberbulosis
different words refer to the same concept. For example, Gender in the US
might be Sex in another country and Sexo in spanish.
I would like to see if OpenEHR has solved this problem so that perhaps
OpenMRS could begin to use archetypes.
Thanks
Joaquin
-Original Message-
*From
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110803/71e07b6c/attachment.html
dissent, which we can try again to
resolve in the future.
You should have a look at the Demographics model archetypes on CKM at
www.openehr.org/knowledge
e.g. Person http://www.openehr.org/knowledge/OKM.html#showArchetype_1013.1.479
We have had a few discussions with openMRS people in the past
101 - 200 of 566 matches
Mail list logo
