On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Herve Jourdain wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> I believe I did say always present on armv8 and armv7, I did not mean before
> that.
Right. The point of considering older architecture levels was that IF
we were to drop support for armv4 (I'm not necessarily suggesting that
Hi Andre,
I believe I did say always present on armv8 and armv7, I did not mean before
that.
Having separate tunes for thumb support was necessary on previous architectures
where it was optional, but it persisted for architectures which made thumb
mandatory.
I’m not even advocating removing the
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 6/12/18 3:39 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>> On 6/12/18 10:49 AM, Herve Jourdain wrote:
Hi,
So I agree with you about restricting to what gcc can support, that's
actuall
On 6/12/18 3:39 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 6/12/18 10:49 AM, Herve Jourdain wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So I agree with you about restricting to what gcc can support, that's
>>> actually my proposal (actually, probably a subset of what gcc can s
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 6/12/18 10:49 AM, Herve Jourdain wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So I agree with you about restricting to what gcc can support, that's
>> actually my proposal (actually, probably a subset of what gcc can support).
>> So for armv8, gcc supports, as archi
always adding it to the tune without creating specific
> variants with or without thumb makes sense, since the tune is normally about
> the SoC capabilities, and arv7 and armv8 both support it.
> You can always select whether you want thumb or not by setting
> ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET appr
cific
variants with or without thumb makes sense, since the tune is normally about
the SoC capabilities, and arv7 and armv8 both support it.
You can always select whether you want thumb or not by setting
ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET appropriately at the distro level.
Cheers,
Herve
-Original Message---
of everyone doing its own?
>
> Cheers,
> Herve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Koen
> Kooi
> Sent: mardi 12 juin 2018 11:01
> To: Randy L
--Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
Sent: mardi 12 juin 2018 11:01
To: Randy Li
Cc: OE-core
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/4] Add tune for ARMv8 and some cortex
proces
> Op 9 jun. 2018, om 08:26 heeft Randy Li het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> I read the ARMv8 manual again, it looks the hardware float is mandatory
> in Linux Distributions and toolchain libraries. Even some cortex
> processors can be configured without FPU/NEON hardware, but I don't
> think they
I read the ARMv8 manual again, it looks the hardware float is mandatory
in Linux Distributions and toolchain libraries. Even some cortex
processors can be configured without FPU/NEON hardware, but I don't
think they would be used in openembeded core.
So I can assume the NEON(SIMD) would exist all
11 matches
Mail list logo
