Re: [opengrok] Results in xml format

2011-04-07 Thread Jens Elkner
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 09:40:25AM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: >This isn't entirely true, >since we try to have the webapp return xhtml strict web pages which ARE > xml >(look at page source / header) >so if you look at returned search result, they should be valid xhtml >and you

Re: [opengrok] Opengrok is returning http status 400 frequently, but not always

2011-04-15 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:18:38AM -0700, Sean McCormick wrote: Hi Sean, > ** Some Background ** > > I have a SRC_ROOT with about 1.8gb of code and other artifacts, in about 110 > separate repositories. > ** The Problem ** > > I have built the index, and can search for things using the command

[opengrok] PMD usage

2011-04-15 Thread Jens Elkner
Hi, is actually anybody using PMD? Or better, does anybody care, if I remove this annoying bloat? Regards, jel. -- Otto-von-Guericke University http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/ Department of Computer Science Geb. 29 R 027, Universitaetsplatz 2 39106 Magdeburg, Germany Tel: +49 391 6

Re: [opengrok] PMD usage

2011-04-15 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 05:48:36PM +0200, Trond Norbye wrote: > > On 15. apr. 2011, at 17.23, Jens Elkner wrote: > > > is actually anybody using PMD? Or better, does anybody care, if I remove > > this annoying bloat? > > > > What's wrong with it being t

Re: [opengrok] [opengrok-dev] [Bug 18242] RFE: Need to add an authentication step prior to browsing source

2011-05-06 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:33:23PM +, bugzi...@opensolaris.org wrote: > https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=18242 > > Trond Norbye changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

Re: [opengrok] [opengrok-dev] [Bug 18242] RFE: Need to add an authentication step prior to browsing source

2011-05-06 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 06:27:28PM +0200, Trond Norbye wrote: > > WOuld that approach allow you to filter out some of the items in the "list" > of available projects to search? Like if we add this config to > src.opensolaris.org/source only the logged in people with access to OpenGrok > may sel

Re: [opengrok] [opengrok-dev] [Bug 18242] RFE: Need to add an authentication step prior to browsing source

2011-05-06 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 08:08:46PM +0200, Trond Norbye wrote: > > On 6. mai 2011, at 19.58, Jens Elkner wrote: > > > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 06:27:28PM +0200, Trond Norbye wrote: > >> > >> WOuld that approach allow you to filter out some of the items in the >

[opengrok] RFE 18281 (refactoring, code cleanup)

2011-05-06 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:32:25PM +0200, Trond Norbye wrote: > > On 6. mai 2011, at 21.26, Lubos Kosco wrote: > > > > > Great work Jens! Thanks :) > > I am actually very very happy someone started the cleanup of jsps > > and I am looking forward to the monster patch ;) Took a while since I g

[opengrok] 18281 status ...

2011-05-11 Thread Jens Elkner
Hi, are there any chances to integrate the suggested changes wrt. #18281 relatively soon? Actually I tend to have a look at the indexer problem (which is possibly rooted @lucene), but on the other side not really, since I don't want diverge too far from the main tree to avoid another big monste

Re: [opengrok] 18281 status ...

2011-05-11 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:09:45PM +0200, Trond Norbye wrote: Hi, > > I started to look at your patches and then I got a high priority bug > I had to look at.. Ahh yes, I guess, everybody can sing a song of it :( > The last thing I found in your patches was that a lot of the files used > the ta

Re: [opengrok] 18281 status ...

2011-05-11 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:07:23PM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > On 11.5.2011 20:03, Jens Elkner wrote: Hi, > >Actually I tend to have a look at the indexer problem (which is possibly > >rooted @lucene), but on the other side not really, since I don't want > > well

Re: [opengrok] [opengrok-dev] [Bug 18281] webapp/code needs cleanup/refactoring, custom repo cmd support

2011-05-11 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:30:14PM +, bugzi...@opensolaris.org wrote: > https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=18281 > > Knut Anders Hatlen changed: > >What|Removed |Added > ---

Re: [opengrok] [opengrok-dev] [Bug 18281] webapp/code needs cleanup/refactoring, custom repo cmd support

2011-05-13 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:26:04PM +, bugzi...@opensolaris.org wrote: > https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=18281 > > Trond Norbye changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

Re: [opengrok] 18281 status ...

2011-05-13 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:12:46AM +0200, Trond Norbye wrote: Hi Trond, > On 12. mai 2011, at 04.53, Jens Elkner wrote: > > > > >> The last thing I found in your patches was that a lot of the files used > >> the tab character for indentation instead of whitespac

Re: [opengrok] [opengrok-dev] Stop retrieving list of files from PageConfig.getResourceFileList(). Only a boolean is needed.

2011-05-18 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:58:46PM +, knut.hat...@oracle.com wrote: > Author: Knut Anders Hatlen > Repository: /hg/opengrok/trunk > Latest revision: 41309a01d5c8e6da6e4840d333ed01510036718d > Total changesets: 1 > Log message: > Stop retrieving list of files from PageConfig.getResourceFileList

Re: [opengrok] [opengrok-dev] Move ensureCommand() from RepositoryInfo down to Repository

2011-05-18 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:44:43PM +, knut.hat...@oracle.com wrote: > Author: Knut Anders Hatlen > Repository: /hg/opengrok/trunk > Latest revision: 31c824bb839936593a6b0cfe12f6aaefc056e726 > Total changesets: 1 > Log message: > Move ensureCommand() from RepositoryInfo down to Repository > >

Re: [opengrok] [opengrok-dev] Move ensureCommand() from RepositoryInfo down to Repository

2011-05-19 Thread Jens Elkner
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:28:10AM +0200, Trond Norbye wrote: > > On 19. mai 2011, at 03.02, Jens Elkner wrote: > > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:44:43PM +, knut.hat...@oracle.com wrote: > >> Author: Knut Anders Hatlen > >> Repository: /hg/op

Re: [opengrok] Patch to retrieve blame list for files that changed its location in GIT

2011-06-08 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 05:06:26AM -0700, Karthik Rajagopalan wrote: Hi, > I didn't receive the reference number for the agreement faxed and emailed to > the information given in the website. Whom should I contact for it? It takes some days (for me ~ 1 week)... Regards, jel. -- Otto-von-Guer

Re: [opengrok] Opengrok 0.10 to work for symbolic link ....

2011-06-08 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:46:39PM -0700, Sadanand Limaye wrote: > I have tried with -N option. But in my case, source code where > there are around 500+ directories structure and lots of then > have sym links so i have to fire separate command with such > -N option because each time the path next

Re: [opengrok] Opengrok 0.10 to work for symbolic link ....

2011-06-08 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 05:02:59PM +0200, Trond Norbye wrote: > > On 8. juni 2011, at 16.51, Jens Elkner wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:46:39PM -0700, Sadanand Limaye wrote: > >> I have tried with -N option. But in my case, source code where > >>

Re: [opengrok] Opengrok 0.10 to work for symbolic link ....

2011-06-08 Thread Jens Elkner
7;t take lucene care of it? > >On 8.6.2011 16:51, Jens Elkner wrote: > >>On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:46:39PM -0700, Sadanand Limaye wrote: > >>>I have tried with -N option. But in my case, source code where > >>>there are around 500+ directories structure and lot

Re: [opengrok] Manual/man page

2011-07-26 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 03:08:32PM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > On 26.7.2011 14:05, Vladimir Kotal wrote: > >On 07/21/11 10:55 PM, Fitz Fitzpatrick wrote: > >>Where do I find the manual, or how do I manify the man page? > > > >On Solaris, the OSOLopengrok package installs the man page to > >/usr/op

Re: [opengrok] 0.11 beta anyone?

2011-12-07 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:32:06PM +0530, Gandhi, Shailey wrote: Hi, >I installed opengrok 0.11. > >Why do the textboxes look like this: The second column of that box (input fields) are all explicitly set to 45ex. So it must be a browser issue (too old?). Regards, jel. -- Otto-von-Guer

Re: [opengrok] 0.11 beta anyone?

2011-12-07 Thread Jens Elkner
org/css/contents.html you would need IE 9 (as far as I remember, it worked with a IE8 preview version as well). Regards, jel. > -Original Message- > From: opengrok-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org > [mailto:opengrok-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jens Elkner >

Re: [opengrok] Do we have any show stopper bugs in 0.11-rc1?

2011-12-08 Thread Jens Elkner
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: > Lubos Kosco writes: > > > Knut has a list > > Well, not really a list. Just one small issue. :) > > On the top of the xref pages, we have these links: > > Home | History | Annotate | Line# | Navigate | Download > > When y

Re: [opengrok] Do we have any show stopper bugs in 0.11-rc1?

2011-12-08 Thread Jens Elkner
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 01:36:35PM +0100, Trond Norbye wrote: > Or should we release it? Found a minor, but haven't had the time, to look at it yet: If one types something like 'bla:' in the full search input field, the error message gets now escaped ... Regards, jel. -- Otto-von-Guericke Univer

Re: [opengrok] [Bug 19105] visual degradations in 0.11 compared to 0.10

2011-12-14 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:29:22AM +0100, Lubos Kosco wrote: > Hmm, I am not sure if user had to do anything with his fonts on his > device/os to get good output > ideally everything just has to work _out of box_ in the default conf Actually, you can't. To get it half-way right, one would need

Re: [opengrok] [Bug 19105] visual degradations in 0.11 compared to 0.10

2011-12-16 Thread Jens Elkner
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:29:16AM +0100, Lubos Kosco wrote: > > OK, so let's do this. > I have some analytics data on what the user base is using to view opengrok, > let me clarify some of this, so we all have an understanding who and on > what devices (usually with default settings, I only hit

Re: [opengrok] Do we have any show stopper bugs in 0.11-rc1?

2011-12-23 Thread Jens Elkner
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:13:27PM +0100, Vladimir Kotal wrote: > On 12/14/11 11:04, Trond Norbye wrote: > >Sure.. just let me know when you're done.. > > Can we get rc2 with at least some of the "visual" (bug 19105) fixes ? > (and the opensearch fix which Lubos integrated after rc1 went out) Ju

Re: [opengrok] Do we have any show stopper bugs in 0.11-rc1?

2011-12-23 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 04:49:43PM +0100, Trond Norbye wrote: > Should I shoot an RC2 today? Tempted to say "release early, release often" (it is an rc*...) ;-) Regards, jel. -- Otto-von-Guericke University http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/ Department of Computer Science Geb. 29 R 027, Unive

Re: [opengrok] Export results to CSV

2012-01-17 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:58:09AM +0100, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: > Lubos Kosco writes: > > > agreed > > I think I added some skeleton to be able to change the number of > > results per page some time ago > > Yes, you did. :) > > If you append &n=3 to the search URL, it'll only return the fir

Re: [opengrok] Should we revert the UI stuff and get the release out there?

2012-01-17 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:16:11PM +0100, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: > > I've changed the style sheets so that the browser's default fonts are > used, which seems to fix the issue with too big fonts. (Not sure it > fixed the related issue with too small fonts mentioned in the bug > report. Vlad, yo

Re: [opengrok] Should we revert the UI stuff and get the release out there?

2012-01-17 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:25:16PM +0100, Lubos Kosco wrote: > > I have a stopper > > Jens changed the way how we include stylesheets > > http://src.opensolaris.org/source/diff/opengrok/trunk/web/httpheader.jspf?r2=%2Fopengrok%2Ftrunk%2Fweb%2Fhttpheader.jspf%401186%3Aa7c1c479ae41&r1=%2Fopengrok%

Re: [opengrok] Export results to CSV

2012-01-17 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:37:48AM +0100, Lubos Kosco wrote: > On 17.1.2012 23:42, Jens Elkner wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:58:09AM +0100, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: > >>Lubos Kosco writes: > >> > >>>agreed > >>>I think I added some skele

Re: [opengrok] Should we revert the UI stuff and get the release out there?

2012-01-17 Thread Jens Elkner
aries ;) Somehow: bending a little bit is ok, but taking its brain completely offline and becoming a robot leads to undesirable development (former GDR citizen know what I mean ;-)). > hmm? Yes. Cheers, jel. > On 18.1.2012 0:13, Jens Elkner wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:25:16P

Re: [opengrok] RuntimeEnvironment.register()V error after 0.11 upgrade

2012-02-15 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 09:16:25PM -0500, Grisha Levit wrote: Hi Guys! >I've just updated from 0.10 to 0.11, wiped my DATA_DIR and DERBY_HOME, >re-deployed the webapp and re-ran the indexer. When I go to visit the > site, >I get the following error. Hope somebody can help me out.

Re: [opengrok] 0.11 respin list

2012-02-21 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:59:13PM +0100, Vladimir Kotal wrote: > On 02/20/12 14:24, Vladimir Kotal wrote: > > > >As discussed with Lubos off-line here's the list of things for 0.11.1: > > > >19180 (ignored list) + split the ignore list to file/directory lists > >(can't find the bug number now) >

Re: [opengrok] 0.11 respin list

2012-02-21 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:02:43PM +0100, Lubos Kosco wrote: > On 21.2.2012 17:18, Jens Elkner wrote: > hg outgoing Ahh ok, thanx a lot :) > (if I follow correctly I stopped on the logging patch, Knut/Trond sent > the reqs to split it please) Ehmm, I think, there's not re

Re: [opengrok] 0.11 respin list

2012-02-22 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:45:32AM +0100, Trond Norbye wrote: >On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Jens Elkner ><[1]jel+openg...@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> wrote: > > Ehmm, I think, there's not really something to split/doesn't make sense. > >So yo

Re: [opengrok] about isolated changesets, was: Re: 0.11 respin list

2012-02-22 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:54:15PM +0100, Trond Norbye wrote: >On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Lubos Kosco <[1]lubos.ko...@oracle.com> >wrote: > > Just to set things straight ... > this isn't a talk about nitpicking , it's a talk about avoiding > regressions > >+ make

Re: [opengrok] passing arguments to ctags

2012-03-19 Thread Jens Elkner
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:10:33PM +0100, Vladimir Kotal wrote: Hi, > /opt/ctags\-5.8/ctags --language-force=asm --language-force=asm > --regex-asm='/(ENTRY_NP|ENTRY)+\(([^ ]*)\)/\2/f/' ./test\-whitespace.c ... > Now, how to pass this extra argument (--regex-asm and its value) to > OpenGrok inde

Re: [opengrok] revision number ToolTip/popup question

2012-03-26 Thread Jens Elkner
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:13:40PM -0400, Haehn, Steven wrote: Hi Steven, ... >that link, I get a ToolTip/popup that contains what I assume to be the >message that was used to checkin that revision. I don’t see that with the >version of OpenGrok (.11) that I am running locally. So what

Re: [opengrok] Bug? Searching across all projects gives a 400 response (bad request, bad query string)

2012-03-29 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:01:23PM +0200, Vladimir Kotal wrote: > On 03/28/12 13:47, Vladimir Kotal wrote: > > > > >clicked on second/third/... page of the results. The Referer (which > >contained long URL with all projects listed) made the HTTP headers too > >long for Tomcat which as a result r

Re: [opengrok] opengrok and text browsers

2012-03-30 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:47:35PM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: Hi Lubos, > I was wondering with all the changes and moving lots of stuff to > javascript in opengrok (which I like, but I am just trying to think > about performance and compatibility and minimizing regressions) performance: Actual

Re: [opengrok] opengrok and text browsers

2012-04-02 Thread Jens Elkner
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:19:59PM +0200, Trond Norbye wrote: Hi Trond, >What are the consequences of a change from jquery to yui for: > >* Us - In terms of code change. Does it solve any problems we have today? It just provides a more complete but still highly scalable framework. Thus i

Re: [opengrok] OpenGrok : java.net.SocketException: Too many open files

2012-06-08 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 04:19:06PM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: Hi, >No workaround >just get 0.11.1 >replace old 0.11 ... >don't forget to replace the webapp, since that's where the fix is in (thnx >Jens!) Ehmm, you mean the 1350:624c2ccb2df3 "avoid eftar file test and exception

Re: [opengrok] OpenGrok : java.net.SocketException: Too many openfiles

2012-06-11 Thread Jens Elkner
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > > So we didn't see this bug in 0.11.1 anymore > I am not sure if this was mitigated by either deleting the eftar or > touching it BTW: When looking at the the lucend fd leak I realized, that the leaks disappear after a certain time.

Re: [opengrok] How to set up 2 opengrok instances on 1 machine?

2012-06-11 Thread Jens Elkner
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:07:30PM +, Huiliang Zhang wrote: Hi, ... >Tomcat6/webapps/searchforTeama à /var/opengrok/teama >Tomcat6/webapps/searchforTeamb à /var/opengrok/teamb > >When the webpages are visited, they show source code repositories for >different teams. However, if

Re: [opengrok] OpenGrok : java.net.SocketException: Too many openfiles

2012-06-12 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:22:18AM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > On 11.6.2012 23:40, Jens Elkner wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > >>So we didn't see this bug in 0.11.1 anymore > >>I am not sure if this was mitigated by either de

Re: [opengrok] javadb historycache not being used with CVS

2012-06-23 Thread Jens Elkner
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:18:56AM +0200, Clements Mark wrote: Hi Clements, > Jens: thanks for the suggestion. > > >Looks like /BUILD/spool is a symlink to /BUILD/environments_nolog2/spool ? > >Any changes, if you index /BUILD/environments_nolog2/spool ... directly ? > > Alas, it doesn't app

Re: [opengrok] javadb historycache not being used with CVS

2012-06-25 Thread Jens Elkner
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Clements Mark wrote: Hi Clements, ... > Weird. Anyway - thanks for your help. I don't have much more time to devote > to this, and in any case everything is working apart from the history cache > (I can still do history searches), so I think I'll just dro

Re: [opengrok] 1600 projects in the list- several issues.

2012-07-31 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:35:00PM +, Bruce Furber wrote: >I never used projects. >If you do not change time stamps on existing files the indexing will be >incremental. Yepp, but on a per project base. If there are no projects, all files are handled like belonging to one big "virt

Re: [opengrok] poll on new feature - binary analyzers using tika (means Opengrok will understand pdf, openoffice, rtf, video and music files, etc.)

2012-08-09 Thread Jens Elkner
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:20:17AM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: Hi Lubos, > > can you please spare a minute to click through this poll please? > I'd like to understand how many people are interested and if they would > be bugged that the size of install bundle would go up by ~ 25MB > > Link: http:/

Re: [opengrok] /source/ in URL

2012-08-14 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > On 13.8.2012 20:55, Don Fike wrote: > >I have a couple installations of Opengrok running but changed the name > >of the war file to a name that better describes the projects Opengrok > >is grokking. This presents an issue as /source/

Re: [opengrok] How to ignore a file without any extension from indexing

2012-08-14 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:00:51PM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: >afaik -I ignores per pattern , not per extension, so your awareness isn't >correct >honestly I'd like this ignoring to work better so it would distinguish >between directories and files at least, so imho it's far from

Re: [opengrok] /source/ in URL

2012-08-14 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 07:13:33PM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > On 14.8.2012 18:34, Jens Elkner wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > >>On 13.8.2012 20:55, Don Fike wrote: > >>>I have a couple installations of Opengrok running but ch

Re: [opengrok] /source/ in URL

2012-08-14 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:40:10PM +0200, Jens Elkner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 07:13:33PM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: ... > > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13985 ... > > size wise please ;) > > (index would grow too much) > > Hmmm, wrt.

Re: [opengrok] /source/ in URL

2012-08-21 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:28:48AM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > On 14.8.2012 23:13, Jens Elkner wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:40:10PM +0200, Jens Elkner wrote: > >>On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 07:13:33PM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > >... > >>>http://defect.open

Re: [opengrok] /source/ in URL

2012-08-21 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > > Hehe > > enjoy your vacation & I will still keep my screen, vim and links around ;) Chi chi, don't wonder if I say, ~ 96% of the time I'm editing/writing something, I use vim as well. Not ancient screen but tmux and even lynx, but

Re: [opengrok] /source/ in URL

2012-08-21 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:10:07PM +0200, Vladimir Kotal wrote: > On 08/21/12 09:14, Jens Elkner wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:28:48AM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > > > > >>javascript is nice, but Sunrays are Sunrays > > > >Hmmm, sunrays are history

Re: [opengrok] Unable to retrieve history

2012-09-11 Thread Jens Elkner
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:37:51PM -0700, Priyanka Gopinath wrote: >Thanks for the response. Looking at the glassfish log files, I found that >Server authentication error was thrown. But how/where do we provide the >settings for glassfish with login permissions to svn? > > > > [#|

Re: [opengrok] OpenGrok with -w

2012-09-12 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:40:04PM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote: > On 11.9.2012 17:35, Don Fike wrote: > >I want to use -w to change the name of the war file from source to a > >site specific name. > >I tried using the ./Opengrok index sourcedir -w /newname/ but OpenGrok > >doesn't take -w as a param

Re: [opengrok] How can I make OpenGrok skip symlinks to directories?

2012-10-03 Thread Jens Elkner
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:50:26PM +0100, Jacobo de Vera wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Petr Sobotka wrote: Moin, > Hi, The -z option doesn't seem to be it: > -z number > depth of scanning for repositories in directory structure > relative to source root Yepp - has not really s

Re: [opengrok] RFE: In annotate view show two revisions - the one which did the change, and the one right before it

2013-02-25 Thread Jens Elkner
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:37:31PM +0100, Stanislav Kozina wrote: Hi, > Pretty often I search for the revision right before given change was > introduced, i.e. "how this code looked like before commit #1234". Just click on "History" and choose whatever you want ;-) > That's why I'd like to