Re: [openhealth] Creating the Free Medical Software Foundation

On Feb 16, 2008, at 9:31 AM, balu raman wrote: I strongly suggest that you work with Dr.Bowen that already runs a non-profit, oemr.org, for FOSS in healthcare, to avoid splintering efforts. If I remember correctly, there was an attack on 'patientOS' with the same reasoning.

Re: [openhealth] Medsphere really is an open source company after all?

like trying to isolate those parts of the human genome that are really human (as opposed to merely mammalian or primate). Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] We may with advantage at times forget what we know. --Publilius Cyrus, c. 100 B.C. [Non-text portions of this message have been

Re: [openhealth] Open standards are meaningless.

still isn't the standard. I'm also well aware of the maturity levels in the IETF process. Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mathematics is the science of patterns. --Lynn Arthur Steen, 1988 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[openhealth] Wiki Book: Basic Physics of Nuclear Medicine

Okay experts, what do you think? http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Basic_Physics_of_Nuclear_Medicine Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Life can only be understood going backwards, but it must be lived going forwards. --Søren Kierkegaard [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [openhealth] Re: GPs Revolt

anything to do with Sun. is this the same thing? Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] We may with advantage at times forget what we know. --Publilius Cyrus, c. 100 B.C. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [openhealth] GPL (vs. BSD) style licenses lead to more collaboration and can be better for business

, and as one on OS gains more market share it tends to become the more attractive alternative to others, creating a positive feedback loop that decidedly favors the more popular OS. Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mathematics is the science of patterns. --Lynn Arthur Steen, 1988 [Non

Re: [openhealth] VistA Office as 'open' EHR software

, is it right? (Okay, that's two questions.) Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Judge a man by his questions not his answers. --Voltaire [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Yahoo! Groups gets a make

Re: [openhealth] New file uploaded to openhealth

. Regards -- Bhaskar Interesting. Where can I read more about this format? Specifications perhaps? Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Metaphors be with you. SPONSORED LINKS Software distribution

Re: [openhealth] New file uploaded to openhealth

On Jun 4, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Molly Cheah wrote: See this http://www.themekit.com/t_odt12.htm Thanks. Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Metaphors be with you. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] SPONSORED LINKS

Re: [openhealth] New file uploaded to openhealth

. Regards -- Bhaskar I see that it has been standardized by OASIS, but are you sure it is an ISO standard? Of course, being standardized by OASIS is nothing to sneeze at. Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Metaphors be with you. SPONSORED LINKS

Re: [openhealth] Number of Linux and Windows Developers Equal in 2006

most common platforms for are Cache, which runs under Windows and other platforms, and GT.M, which runs under Linux, as well as some other platforms.) Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Metaphors be with you. SPONSORED LINKS

Re: [openhealth] Number of Linux and Windows Developers Equal in 2006

On Jun 3, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Gregory Woodhouse wrote: So, if you're MUMPS developer working on VistA, what does that make you? (Note that the two most common platforms for are Cache, which runs under Windows and other platforms, and GT.M, which runs under Linux, as well as some other

Re: [openhealth] Architecture Question - VistA and MHS enterprise architecture

/hardhats-members Unfortunately, Greg Woodhouse is unfamiliar with the specific nomenclature here. Maybe you can help him out with some of the specific terminology. === Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is at all comprehensible. --Albert

Re: [openhealth] CCHIT biased towards proprietary software??

department, but does that mean we can only respond with defeatism? In view, overemphasis on testing and process, to the exclusion of engineering principles is a major factor in our failure to develop reliable systems at a reasonable cost. === Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Design quality

Re: [openhealth] Dangerous idea -- quality

On Jan 7, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Tim.Churches wrote: Gregory Woodhouse wrote: but I think the undefeated would not be content relying on testing to determine whether or not their software worked correctly. Um, if you don't rely on testing, then how do you determine that your software

Re: [openhealth] Dangerous idea -- quality

On Jan 7, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Tim.Churches wrote: Gregory Woodhouse wrote: Relying on process and testing as a means of achieving software quality is an admission of defeat Um, are you suggesting that the undefeated write software which is always completely defect-free, without the need