What about:
1) Custom shaders
2) 3D Canvas
Felix
On 22 April 2015 at 11:37, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> Of these, handling transparency / blending is likely for JDK 9.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
> Herve Girod wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> As a newbie user of Java 3D, I have some suggestions in the back of my
Of these, handling transparency / blending is likely for JDK 9.
-- Kevin
Herve Girod wrote:
Hello,
As a newbie user of Java 3D, I have some suggestions in the back of my head
for Java 9, as for example:
- managing opacity (alpha) on 3D Node (the most important IMO)
- parallel lights
- managin
Hi Kevin,
Please review the proposed fix.
JiRA: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-40004
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/RT-40004/webrev.00/
Thanks,
- Chien
Hello,
As a newbie user of Java 3D, I have some suggestions in the back of my head
for Java 9, as for example:
- managing opacity (alpha) on 3D Node (the most important IMO)
- parallel lights
- managing far / near clip with parallel camera
- some more built-in 3D Shapes would be useful
I think th
When you build OpenJFX it doesn't build the media or webkit libraries by
default. You can enable them, but they (especially WebKit) require
additional libraries on your build machine. If you don't build them, it
will use the ones from the JDK that you use to build. The ones we
currently ship wi
I use centos 6.4 + openjdk8 (build 25.40-b18, mixed mode) and openjfx (I build
it from today sources).
I have 64 box. And I can't use the html components (all other components seem
to work normally) - webview,webengine,htmleditor. When I try to use them I get:
Caused by: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLin
I don't know about JEP submission process, but you'd first have to solve
the problem that when Java added serialization of parameter names to class
files in Java 8, the OpenJDK devs explicitly decided *not* to expose them
for the JDK itself, on the grounds that they didn't want parameter names to
b
Hello Alexander,
It looks like that you have GCC version < 4.6 and it lacks diagnostics
push/pop functionality[1]
that we are using to suppress deprecation warnings. We have moved to gcc
4.8 on Linux recently[2].
So the fix is to upgrade GCC to at least 4.6. Or as a workaround you may
apply
I am trying to build openjfx from sources - centos 6.4. 64 openjdk8 (build
25.60-b11, mixed mode), I run
/gradle-1.8/bin/gradle --info --debug
and this is what I get:
10:11:09.184 [ERROR] [system.err] cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
10:11:09.186 [ERROR] [system.err]
/home/PE/Temp/rt
I am trying to build openjfx from sources - centos 6.4. 64 openjdk8 (build
25.60-b11, mixed mode), I run
/gradle-1.8/bin/gradle --info --debug
and this is what I get:
10:11:09.184 [ERROR] [system.err] cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
10:11:09.186 [ERROR] [system.err]
/home/PE/Temp/rt
Totally off topic, I apologise, but the subscribers to this list are the type
of people who may have the experience I seek.
I've been trying to pitch the concept of named parameters for Java 9, but
somehow my JEP is never picked up. I emailed it in twice. Has anyone ever
successfully handed in
11 matches
Mail list logo
