JavaFX 11 is released

I am pleased to announce the final release of JavaFX 11 as well as the launch of a new OpenJFX community site at: http://openjfx.io/ The GA version of JavaFX 11 is now live and can be downloaded by going to the openjfx.io site or by accessing javafx modules from maven central at openjfx:javaf

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

Adding to what Kevin already said (huge thanks to Kevin and Oracle for all they did), I want to thank everyone on this list for being part of this release. The JavaFX 11 release is a huge milestone, and there are many people who contributed, some of them who have been working with JavaFX from day 1

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

Johan, Kevin, a big "thank you!" from someone who has based his company and career on JavaFX. This release will put an end to all of the „JavaFX is dead“ speculations / rumors out there and it will hopefully also mark the beginning of ongoing and accelerated development of this fantastic piece

Compiling OpenJFX

I am trying (again) to get my toes wet with building OpenJFX myself. Here are some things I am wondering about: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX#BuildingOpenJFX-Gradle says: Gradle is the primary build tool for building OpenJFX. We currently use Gradle 4.8

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

Excellent work, congratulations to everyone involved and the new site is wonderful.

Improve the pom.xml referenced in Maven example

Hi! I am not sure if there is a format to reporting such minor possible improvements. Pardon me if this is not the correct mailing list to share such minor enhancements and please help redirect this to the correct person in that case. (Since I couldn't find the source on GitHub as well) The Run Hel

Re: Improve the pom.xml referenced in Maven example

Hi Nigam, Please raise a PR in https://github.com/openjfx/openjfx-docs Regards, Abhinay From: openjfx-dev on behalf of Naman Nigam Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 8:06 PM To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Improve the pom.xml referenced in Maven examp

Re: Compiling OpenJFX

Good catch. I fixed it to reference to gradle-4.8/ bin. -- Kevin On 9/18/2018 6:51 AM, Robert Lichtenberger wrote: I am trying (again) to get my toes wet with building OpenJFX myself. Here are some things I am wondering about: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX#B

Re: Improve the pom.xml referenced in Maven example

Sure, thanks for pointing out the docs repository. Did that => https://github.com/openjfx/openjfx-docs/pull/2 Regards Naman Nigam +91-9761212401 | LinkedIn On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:14 PM Abhinay Agarwal wrote: > Hi Nigam, > > Please raise

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

I don't see a way to attach java classes at the bug report form located here: https://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/start_form.do Is there some way to do this?  Thank you.    On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:   I am pleased to announce the final release of Ja

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

You can either paste the code in line, upload it to Google Drive or similar, or else email the bundle to one of us and we will attach it. -- Kevin On 9/18/2018 9:31 AM, jav...@use.startmail.com wrote: I don't see a way to attach java classes at the bug report form located here: https://bugr

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

No. If you have a test case, include it in the body. if its too big for that .. then maybe it needs to be trimmed down anyway. -phil. On 09/18/2018 09:31 AM, jav...@use.startmail.com wrote: I don't see a way to attach java classes at the bug report form located here: https://bugreport.java.co

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

In general, smaller test cases are better, so this the preferred choice. -- Kevin On 9/18/2018 9:37 AM, Phil Race wrote: No. If you have a test case, include it in the body. if its too big for that .. then maybe it needs to be trimmed down anyway. -phil. On 09/18/2018 09:31 AM, jav...@use.st

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

Thanks Kevin. I will paste it all in this email. I have essentially three versions. Two are so compressed it's hard for people to get what the issue is. Since in those programs the proof only takes the form of the value of a class variable, and that proof is demonstrated only by  System.out.p

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

I really meant that when you file a bug at https://bugreport.java.com/ you can paste it inline there, along with your description of the bug. If you have already filed a bug, send me the ID and I can copy the info into that bug. Thanks. -- Kevin On 9/18/2018 11:26 AM, jav...@use.startmail.c

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

We will review your report and have assigned it an internal review ID : 9057296. hth...   On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:   I really meant that when you file a bug at https://bugreport.java.com/ you can paste it inline there, along with your description of

[12] RFR: JDK-8210386: Clipping problems with complex affine transforms

Please review the following bug fix in the MarlinFX renderer for JavaFX 12: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210386 https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/206 PS: What is the process to backport this bug fix to OpenJFX 11 updates ? This patch is small and can be applied directly

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

Yes, thank you for filing it. It should be transferred to the JDK project tomorrow. -- Kevin On 9/18/2018 12:30 PM, jav...@use.startmail.com wrote: We will review your report and have assigned it an internal review ID : 9057296. hth... On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Kevin Rushf

"javapackager" in no-mans-land?

I understand that along with JavaFX being removed from the Oracle JDK distribution in Java 11, the Oracle team will no longer release the `javapackager` tool. I also see there is a JEP discussing an eventual replacement, JEP-343 ( http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/343). Just to confirm, the tool was N

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

Congratulations to all involved in this! Looking forward to seeing JavaFX grow now it's outside of the JDK. -Chris On Tue, September 18, 2018 14:08, Johan Vos wrote: > Adding to what Kevin already said (huge thanks to Kevin and Oracle for > all they did), I want to thank everyone on this list fo

Re: Compiling OpenJFX

Yeah, I missed that one during the recent update of the instructions. Thanks. If you have any other improvements you'd like to suggest that are not related to WebKit please send them my way. I never built Webkit so I can't help with that. On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:52 PM Robert Lichtenberger < r.l

BUG: TableView's setMouseTransparent method does not make mouse transparent

Bug review ID: 9057302. TavleView's setMouseTransparent no longer makes mouse events(like clicking) transparent for that TableView when set to true in JavaFX 11. In Oracle 9 and 10 it did, however. I vaguely remember compiling OpenJDK 10 with JavaFX integrated and had the same issue even thou

BUG: zip file in sdk lib folder causes bugged JDK build

The zip file "src.zip" located in rt/build/sdk/lib/ after building JavaFX from source causes a bugged build of OpenJDK with JavaFX integrated into it. The build itself completes just fine, it's just that resulting build has issues. Because a zip file isn't a supported module format, Netbeans s

Re: "javapackager" in no-mans-land?

It was migrated, but removed... The recommended work-around is to use the javapackager in OracleJDK 10 when packing Java/OpenJfx 11 applications. That may or may not be practical depending on your build setup. Also, if you’re currently using the UserJvmOptions services, these are also gone in