On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:44:43 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>> This is a test fix.
>>
>> Root cause:
>> - For ButtonTest - Incorrect use of MouseEventFirer - which puts Button on
>> to the stage and shows it before firing mouse event
>> - For ComboBoxTest - adding ComboBox to a Stage, not
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:29:13 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
> We should use the public_suffix_list.dat file in the JDK instead. Reading the
> public_suffix_list.dat file is modified to be similar to
>
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:32:59 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
> As discussed in the [JBS
> issue](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199592), when snapping an
> already snapped value (either intentionally or by mistake), the result
> should be the same, otherwise we'll be jumping unnecessary
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 13:24:44 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> It's based on the discussion of my previous PR:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/71
>>
>> I Added test utility class copied from JMemoryBuddy and used it to simplify
>> 4 of the existing unit tests.
>>
>> It's a direct copy
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:03:20 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>> @kleopatra Thanks for checking.
>>
>> As discussed in the JBS issue, there is a call in
>> `CheckBoxSkin::layoutChildren` that, probably by mistake, calls `snapSizeX`
>> twice, and that gives different results when a different
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 16:56:46 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> @rwestberg I was pleasantly surprised to see the Skara bot add this:
>>
>>> | Linux x64 | Windows x64 | macOS x64
>>> -- | -- | -- | --
>>> Build / test | ✔️ (1/1 passed) | ✔️ (1/1 passed) | ✔️ (1/1 passed)
>>
>> I was going to ask you
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 14:41:08 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This is a proposed fix for
> [JDK-8254691](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254691) to enable
> GitHub actions for the jfx repo. It is similar in purpose to what was done
> for the jdk repo.
>
> Once this is integrated, and
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 18:26:29 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>> @rwestberg I was pleasantly surprised to see the Skara bot add this:
>>>
>>> > Linux x64
>>> > Windows x64
>>> > macOS x64
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Build / test
>>> > heavy_check_mark (1/1 passed)
>>> > heavy_check_mark (1/1
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 16:28:28 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This is a proposed fix for
>> [JDK-8254691](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254691) to enable
>> GitHub actions for the jfx repo. It is similar in purpose to what was done
>> for the jdk repo.
>>
>> Once this is
This is a proposed fix for
[JDK-8254691](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254691) to enable
GitHub actions for the jfx repo. It is similar in purpose to what was done for
the jdk repo.
Once this is integrated, and subsequently merged into your personal fork, a
GitHub Actions workflow
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 14:49:37 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This is a proposed fix for
>> [JDK-8254691](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254691) to enable
>> GitHub actions for the jfx repo. It is similar in purpose to what was done
>> for the jdk repo.
>>
>> Once this is
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:27:30 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> curious: it this expected to fix the ellipsed checkBox texts? Can verify
>> that the test fails/passes before/after the fix, but the example in the
>> report looks still is eclipsed: same for 1.5, slightly better (in that only
>> the
12 matches
Mail list logo
