Re: OpenJFX mirror at BitBucket?

2015-03-17 Thread dalibor topic
contributed to the files in the pull request, how to contact them, if they are covered under the OCA, etc. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K

Re: OpenJFX mirror at BitBucket?

2015-03-18 Thread dalibor topic
B forks from A, patches again and submits some sort of 'pull request' to the mailing list incorporating both change sets. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE D

Re: OpenJFX mirror at BitBucket?

2015-03-18 Thread dalibor topic
y to do it over and over again. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung:

Re: Private APIs not usable in Java 9?

2015-04-09 Thread dalibor topic
Jigsaw would be the jigsaw-dev mailing list. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG H

Re: JavaFX JIRA issues moving to JBS

2015-04-15 Thread dalibor topic
tself can be sent to o...@openjdk.java.net." cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG

Re: JavaFX JIRA issues moving to JBS

2015-04-15 Thread dalibor topic
te notifications for this bugs after the migration? See https://robilad.livejournal.com/139637.html cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühne

Re: Off topic: named parameters

2015-05-20 Thread dalibor topic
tic engineering plan." cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practic

Re: Future of JavaFX

2015-12-01 Thread dalibor topic
://joeyh.name/blog/entry/thread_patterns/ when reading e-mail. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V

Re: Future of JavaFX

2015-12-01 Thread dalibor topic
unity requires Contributors to jointly assign their copyright on contributed code." as http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/ wisely says. There is no good reason to change that. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089

Re: Future of JavaFX

2015-12-01 Thread dalibor topic
esets in the rt repository in the last 12 months.[0] In fact, the number of such changesets has increased significantly after the migration to JIRA back in June. Looks like the objective reality is quite different from subjective perception. ;) cheers, dalibor topic [0] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/o

Re: Future of JavaFX

2015-12-02 Thread dalibor topic
been discussed already. cheers, dalibor topic [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/adoption-discuss -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761

Re: Future of JavaFX

2015-12-02 Thread dalibor topic
ibutors have to take time away to support them." [1] cheers, dalibor topic [1] http://opensource.com/life/15/3/how-to-fire-community-members -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. &

Re: Future of JavaFX

2015-12-02 Thread dalibor topic
On 02.12.2015 10:44, Ryan Jaeb wrote: Which is it - discuss or adoption-discuss? adoption-discuss is for general discussion about bundling and aiding OpenJDK collaboration, discuss is for general discussion about the OpenJDK Community. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.

Re: Future of JavaFX

2015-12-03 Thread dalibor topic
-relnotes-2225394.html for information about Bundled Patch Release (BPR) builds of JDK 8. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hambu

Re: Future of JavaFX

2015-12-03 Thread dalibor topic
someone to implement/fix it for them. Whatever option one picks, please refrain from using this technical mailing list for non-technical discussions. [2] As a reminder, technical discussions are about code. cheers, dalibor topic [0] http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/java/standard-edition/supp

Re: ProgressIndicator indeterminate transition bugs

2016-02-29 Thread dalibor topic
he Census -> write comments in JBS bugs, open your own, etc. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deu

Re: HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

2016-05-30 Thread dalibor topic
On 27.05.2016 15:10, Konstantin Pasko wrote: Hi Kevin, sorry for the offtopic, but as you just mentioned JDK 10, could you please tell us what is planned for that release? You can track JEPs being drafted for 10 at http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/0 . cheers, dalibor topic -- <h

Re: Anyone using JMX with JavaFX?

2016-06-10 Thread dalibor topic
I suspect that particular plugin is extremely rarely used, judging by https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=%22javafx-mx.jar%22&type=Code&ref=searchresults showing 0 results. cheers, dalibor topic On 09.06.2016 00:31, Kevin Rushforth wrote: As some of you may be aware

Re: Anyone using JMX with JavaFX?

2016-06-10 Thread Dalibor Topic
more suitable venue for discussion of such interests. While I can't help you find an adequate forum to discuss telephony equipment used by employees of other organizations, I hope that you will be able to find a better place to do so in the future. Cheers, Dalibor Topic -- <http://www.or

Re: Anyone using JMX with JavaFX?

2016-06-13 Thread dalibor topic
nt of bitterness in your posts. You can change that. All the best, Dalibor Topic [0] https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/thread_patterns/ On 10.06.2016 15:29, Felix Bembrick wrote: Dalibor, please forgive me for assuming that Oracle had access to an English language parser. I could translate my ori

Re: Anyone using JMX with JavaFX?

2016-06-13 Thread dalibor topic
, spamming this list with off-topic posts could result in removal from it without further warning. cheers, dalibor topic On 13.06.2016 12:37, Felix Bembrick wrote: Thanks you most sincerely Dalibor for that very direct response. Only... it wasn't really, was it? You "believe I am e

Re: Anyone using JMX with JavaFX?

2016-06-13 Thread dalibor topic
an open source project's mailing list is a useful tool to deal with individuals which contribute negatively to a project, if they don't seem to be able to change their act. cheers, dalibor topic On 13.06.2016 14:11, Felix Bembrick wrote: Dear Dalibor, "This mailing list is th

Re: Anyone using JMX with JavaFX?

2016-06-13 Thread dalibor topic
this mailing list with off-topic posts, as you have done so far, despite being asked to stop both on and off-list, then I trust that the mailing list administrator could take care of this problem for all of us. cheers, dalibor topic On 13 Jun 2016, at 22:45, dalibor topic wrote: Felix, Th

Re: Anyone using JMX with JavaFX?

2016-06-14 Thread dalibor topic
ot;advocacy", "trying to defend Java", etc. cheers, dalibor topic [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2000/8/25/132 -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5

Re: Looking forward to JavaFX 9!

2016-06-15 Thread dalibor topic
ort Roadmap at http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html . If you have any further questions about Oracle support, please direct them at your Oracle sales representative. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494

Re: Looking forward to JavaFX 9!

2016-06-15 Thread dalibor topic
ve attention. Allowing non-technical discussions to fester on a technical mailing list can be a serious discouragement to new Contributors, and mislead newcomers to assume that toxic and entitled behavior is acceptable or even desirable in a given open source forum or a project. It's not.

Re: JavaFX 9 & FXCanvas

2016-06-17 Thread dalibor topic
nravel the history of third party code in order to understand who can contribute what, if anything, could be more work and more time consuming than coming up with a better & novel solution from scratch, if it's 'just' a couple of bug fixes. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http

Re: Scene graph performance

2016-07-21 Thread dalibor topic
There is no JDK 10 Project in OpenJDK yet, so there has been no proposed schedule for it yet. cheers, dalibor topic On 21.07.2016 20:51, Felix Bembrick wrote: What is a "ball park" figure (i.e. around the 6-9 month granularity if possible) for the the release date for JDK 10?

Re: Exception running FXMark with JavaFX 9

2016-08-16 Thread dalibor topic
On 16.08.2016 07:50, Felix Bembrick wrote: How do I access PerformanceTracker in Java/JavaFX 9? Please see http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/261 cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961

Re: Hmm, another attempt to get information on deploying javax.script (via FXMLLoader) and SceneBuilder and javax.script languages ...

2016-11-28 Thread dalibor topic
Community. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D

Re: RFE/Suggestions to improve JavaFX deployment of javax.script (part of Java) engines and script code

2016-12-08 Thread dalibor topic
ific ideas. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 2

Re: More community participation in JavaFX

2018-02-06 Thread dalibor topic
can be a source of frustration. Not enforcing it, on the other hand, creates long term frustration as well. [0] cheers, dalibor topic [0] The implosion of the TeamFX repo is a good example. -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobil

Re: More community participation in JavaFX

2018-02-06 Thread dalibor topic
for one's own operating system. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverw

Re: More community participation in JavaFX

2018-02-08 Thread dalibor topic
nalysis (rather than collection of random anecdotal 'evidence', or rants as is customary in open source development ;) of modern, yet unsustainable open source projects. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +4940890912

Re: The "javafx might not be present" problem

2018-02-09 Thread dalibor topic
ava SE Platform, as specified by JSRs in the Java Community Process. " cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg OR

Re: The "javafx might not be present" problem

2018-02-09 Thread dalibor topic
ril. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BionicBeaver/ReleaseSchedule for the 18.04 release schedule. Feature freeze is coming up on March 1st. There won't be OpenJDK 9 in 18.04. See https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-February/004275.html for details. cheers, dalibor t

Re: The "javafx might not be present" problem

2018-02-09 Thread dalibor topic
as it may sound. Running a JSR for an open source library would not make a lot of sense if the sole purpose of that work was to add it to some JDK download. The module system already exists. cheers, dalibor topic Sven Am 09.02.2018 18:53 schrieb "dalibor topic" <mail

Re: OpenJDK 32 bit on Mac?

2013-06-28 Thread Dalibor Topic
xample: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2012-June/004544.html No idea if it still works, though, or it ever did, as no one was actively working on making the 32 bit build pass the relevant test suites, etc. so it never got merged in. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle <http:/

Re: JavaFX on iOS and Android: The real problem and challenge

2013-11-08 Thread Dalibor Topic
On 11/8/13 10:30 PM, Florian Brunner wrote: > @Oracle: Could you set up the according project sites for these 3 platforms > on openjdk.java.net Please see http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ for how Projects work. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic

Re: WebView rendering issues

2014-07-14 Thread dalibor topic
On 14.07.2014 17:41, Doug Schaefer wrote: > Just wondering what the timeline for 8u40 would be See http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2014-July/001435.html cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214

Re: RFR: 8197991: Selecting many items in a TableView is very slow

2021-04-12 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:37:06 GMT, yosbits wrote: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197991 > > The performance of the selectAll and selectRange methods of the > MultiSelectionModel class has been greatly improved. > > This greatly improves the response when selecting multiple items i

Re: RFR: 8185887: TableRowSkinBase fails to correctly virtualize cells in horizontal direction

2021-04-12 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 07:39:43 GMT, yosbits wrote: > If there are many columns, the current TableView will stall scrolling. > Resolving this performance issue requires column virtualization. > Virtualization mode is enabled when the row height is fixed by the following > method. > > `tableView

Re: RFR: 8265425: Hard failure when building OpenJFX for Linux AArch64

2021-04-22 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:21:20 GMT, Tor (torbuntu) wrote: > For building on aarch64 linux systems we need it added to the buuld.gradle to > stop ignoring it. Hi, Alternatively, you can fill out the form at https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/oca-405177.pdf out, and send an e-mail with the scan

Re: RFR: 8276167: fixing VirtualFlow.scrollToTop(int)

2021-12-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 12:19:40 GMT, eduardsdv wrote: > Fix VirtualFlow.scrollToTop(int) doesn't scroll to the top of the last > element but to the bottom of the last element. Hi, please send me an e-Mail at dalibor.to...@oracle.com and I can help with the verification process. - PR

Re: Netbeans X & Java 11?

2018-11-19 Thread dalibor topic
effect, you should be doing so on an Apache NetBeans mailing list. Please see https://netbeans.apache.org/ for the many different ways of participating in Apache NetBeans. cheers, dalibor topic -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 |

Re: Request for adding my github userid ..

2020-02-26 Thread Dalibor Topic
thing with which to associate your github id. Hmm, how should I then submit a fix/a pull request? The OCA was processed in 2017-03-01 (reported by Dalibor Topic), as suggested I introduced myself in [1]. However, for various reasons I got side tracked and only came back this last November. @

Re: RFR: 8197991: Selecting many items in a TableView is very slow

2020-04-03 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:37:06 GMT, yosbits wrote: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197991 > > The performance of the selectAll and selectRange methods of the > MultiSelectionModel class has been greatly improved. > > This greatly improves the response when selecting multiple items i

Re: RFR: 8185886: Improve scrolling performance of TableView and TreeTableView

2020-04-03 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:00:06 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote: >> I took the liberty of pointing out some formatting errors > > The title of your PR should match the title of the JBS issue. Moreover, #108 > already tackles this issue with a > different approach and 2 PRs on the same issue can't be intetgrat

Re: RFR: 8251946: ObservableList.setAll does not conform to specification

2020-09-04 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 00:23:38 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> While adding unit tests, I noticed that I missed an important edge-case that >> has to be considered when computing if a >> list was modified. The initial implementation assumed that >>> the list was modified if >>>1. it was not empty (m

Re: RFR: 8251946: ObservableList.setAll does not conform to specification

2020-09-04 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:17:18 GMT, Leon Linhart wrote: >> One overall comment while we are waiting for your OCA to be approved. >> >> I don't think the complexity of this proposed fix to `setAll` is warranted. >> I would prefer a simpler fix that returns >> `false` if both the current list and t