Re: postfix starting bug

2006-03-22 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Am Dienstag, 21. März 2006 12:47 schrieb Torsten Homeyer: Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote: [...] Thus I am suggesting the following patch (only minimally tested). [...] +{ ! ps -elf|grep postfix/m[a]ster /dev/null 21 \ +

Re: large file support for fsl? (was: Not getting error msgs.)

2006-03-22 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Am Dienstag, 21. März 2006 18:33 schrieb Adam D. Morley: Hi Adam, thanks for the hint! I have had a look and runit is not within the OpenPKG packages. (daemontools is un-free by common Free Software (Open Source) standards as far as I know.) I am a bit unsure if it would fit well with fsl,

Re: large file support for fsl? (was: Not getting error msgs.)

2006-03-22 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Hallo Ralf, kannst Du mir mit wenig Aufwand eine unverbindliche Abschätzung machen, was es kosten würde, wenn Ihr (OpenPKG GmbH) fsl mit LFS verseht? Inklusive OpenPKG Paket, was wir auf 2.4 2.5 verwenden können. Wenn es Dir garkeine Mühe macht, dann würde mich der Aufwand für einen Patch für

Re: kill -0 not killing (was: postfix starting bug)

2006-03-22 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote: Am Dienstag, 21. März 2006 17:48 schrieb Simon J Mudd: Torsten Homeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: ps -elf is not portable enough. Better would be something like a kill -0 `cat master.pid`. If you are going to

Re: postfix starting bug

2006-03-22 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote: [...] Talking about shell portability, you probably know a lot more than I do. I have looked up POSIX for ps and -elf are posix options. grin Yes, I know. They even can be _used_ without errors on a BSD system. But unfortunately (for historical

Re: large file support for fsl? (was: Not getting error msgs.)

2006-03-22 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote: [...non-english private request...] Please be careful and do not post in non-English language or with private requests on the public mailing list. My answer you will receive in private. Ralf S. Engelschall

OpenPKG registry issues

2006-03-22 Thread Martin Konold
Hi, doese the registry work for anyone? For me it is simply failing for different email addresses I tried with ERROR: ACTIVATION FAILED IMHO the OpenPKG Registry is an annoying PITA :-( Yours, -- martin -- http://www.erfrakon.com/ Erlewein, Frank, Konold Partner - Beratende Ingenieure

Re: OpenPKG registry issues

2006-03-22 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006, Martin Konold wrote: doese the registry work for anyone? For me it is simply failing for different email addresses I tried with ERROR: ACTIVATION FAILED Yes, I see it in the logfiles. You started the enrollment process for Martin Konold [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin Konold