On Sun, Jul 25, 2004, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:03:09AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004, Michael van Elst wrote:
[..]
One could special case the openpkg package, but I'd like to avoid this
if possible.
The following patch
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
[...]
Then I'll release openpkg-tool with your patch. Thanks.
Ok, openpkg-tools-0.8.16-20040725 and openpkg-tools-0.8.16-2.1.1
now contain this patch and no longer try to update the bootstrap
package every time. Thanks for the fast help,
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:59:01AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
That's a known bug in the openpkg build command (see
http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile/openpkg-tools/TODO for a
list of known issues). It works fine for CURRENT, but when
updating a RELEASE it always thinks that the openpkg
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:59:01AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
That's a known bug in the openpkg build command (see
http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile/openpkg-tools/TODO for a
list of known issues). It works fine for CURRENT, but when
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004, Michael van Elst wrote:
[..]
One could special case the openpkg package, but I'd like to avoid this
if possible.
The following patch therefore will simply select the database entry with
the smallest version number, i.e. OpenPKG-2.1.0-2.1.0 when deciding on
wether it
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:03:09AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004, Michael van Elst wrote:
[..]
One could special case the openpkg package, but I'd like to avoid this
if possible.
The following patch therefore will simply select the database entry with
the
After I build all packages (except postfix that doesn't compile), but shurly
twice the openpkg-2.1.0, if I run openpkg build -Ua it always whants to rebuild
openpkg-2.1.0.
Why is this happining ? openpkg-2.1.0 is already installed
Thanks,
Alex
--
ATIX Tecnologia e Com Ltda
Tel.: +55-(11)
