icsson.com;
ravisekhar.ko...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] amf: add support for container/contained [#70]
Hi Thuan,
I can't seem to reproduce this. Can you tell me the exact steps for how you
are setting it up?
Alex
On 09/27/2018
,
Thuan
From: Jones, Alex [8]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 12:10 AM
To: Tran Thuan [9];
[10]nagen...@hasolutions.in; 'Gary Lee' [11];
[12]hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; [13]ravisekhar.ko...@oracle.com
Cc: [14]opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [
x' ; nagen...@hasolutions.in; 'Gary Lee'
; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com;
ravisekhar.ko...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] amf: add support for container/contained [#70]
Hi Alex,
I can fetch your code. Will try it and reply if any conce
#x27;Gary Lee'
; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com;
ravisekhar.ko...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] amf: add support for container/contained [#70]
Hi Thuan,
I pushed the latest ticket-70 to my review repo.
For these concerns you have try clea
SC-1 opensaf_reboot: Rebooting local node;
timeout=60
Best Regards,
Thuan
-Original Message-
From: [8]nagen...@hasolutions.in [9]
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 12:57 PM
To: Alex Jones [10]; Gary Lee
[11];
[12]hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; [13]
; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com;
ravisekhar.ko...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] amf: add support for container/contained [#70]
Hi Tran,
Here is a patch you can overlay to fix this crash.
Alex
On 09/21/2018 06:31 AM, Tran Thuan wrote:
[6]ravisekhar.ko...@oracle.com
Cc: [7]opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] amf: add support for
container/contained
[#70]
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the patch.
From my side Ack. I wish that I could have tested the following area (I
assume you w
: Alex Jones ; Gary Lee ;
hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; ravisekhar.ko...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] amf: add support for container/contained
[#70]
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the patch.
>From my side Ack. I wish that I could have tested the following area (I
assu
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the patch.
>From my side Ack. I wish that I could have tested the following area (I assume
>you would have covered it):
- Headless enabled test cases
- CSI Dep, SI Dep testing(in 2N red model)
- Combinations of Admin operations on Container and contained (in all 5 red
models
Hi Nagu,
Here's a patch that fixes your issue in test #1.
For the other code review issues, is it OK if I just add them when
I push the final patch. Or do you want to review them now?
Alex
On 08/30/2018 01:44 AM, [1]nagen...@hasolutions.in wrote:
_
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your response.
For Test #2, I had configured all SUs on the single node SC-1. So, 2 container
SUs and 2 contained SUs are on the same node. In such cases, we can have the
implementation as having only one SU of that node(higher rank SUs may be) to be
the container for all t
The probation time is the default in the config: 4s.
Alex
On 08/28/2018 01:32 AM, Gary Lee wrote:
__
NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender
_
Hi Nagu,
I have a fix for your issue test #1. I will send out a patch along
with changes for code review #1 and #2.
For issue test #2, I think this needs to be handled in the
configuration. In this case because there is no explicit node set for
the contained SUs, su.cc:m
Hi Alex,
Code review:
1. Header for few functions are missing.
2. Clc.cc: Need to add '0' in place avnd_comp_clc_inst_try_again_hdler in other
fsm states.
Testing:
1. Uploaded AppConfig-container.xml and AppConfig-contained-2N.xml
Performed:
amf-adm unlock-in safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Con
Hi Alex
No, I just ran kill 10 times to escalate restart to failover.
Do you have a really small probation time in your demo config?
Gary
On 28/8/18 4:09 am, Alex Jones wrote:
G'day Gary,
I can't reproduce this. Do you have a script or something that
reproduces it?
Alex
On 08/15/20
G'day Gary,
I can't reproduce this. Do you have a script or something that
reproduces it?
Alex
On 08/15/2018 11:52 PM, Gary Lee wrote:
__
NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender
_
Hi Alex
Thanks, it looks much better.
So I tried ‘killall amf_container_demo” 10 times really quickly:
2018-08-16 13:43:22.652 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO
'safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Container' restarts have reached configured
limit of 10
2018-08-16 13:43:22.653 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]
G'day Gary,
I see you were adding the XML file dynamically with "immcfg -f". I
hadn't tried that. I hadn't tried killing the sample app, either.
Here is a patch that should fix both issues. Apply it on top of the
latest big one I sent.
Alex
On 08/13/2018 10:37 PM, G
Hi Alex
I modified AppConfig-container.xml and changed saAmfSgtRedundancyModel
from 4 (NwayAct) to 1 (2N).
The xml still loads and I could unlock, resulting in:
root@SC-1:/var/log# immlist safVersion=1,safSgType=Container
Name Type Value(s)
==
Hi Gary,
I just resubmitted a new patch which breaks out the different
components, and addresses the other comments here. But, #2 (rejecting
all but NWay-active for container) should already be in there. Is there
a specific test you ran that didn't work?
Alex
On 08/13/20
Hi Alex
Some initial comments:
0. Is it possible to split up the patch into amfd / amfnd / common / samples.
Just makes it easier to reply inline.
1. Please compile the container demo by default, and make amf_container_script
world executable.
Eg.
diff --git a/samples/amf/Makefile.am b/samp
21 matches
Mail list logo
