Hello,
On Jul 1, 2010, at 15:07 , Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> Just a quick note that Apple Keychain is free, open source software
> released under the terms of the APSL. So it seems that a better support
> for smartcards could be added.
>
> Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keychain_
Le 1 juillet 2010 14:07, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE a écrit :
> Just a quick note that Apple Keychain is free, open source software
> released under the terms of the APSL. So it seems that a better support
> for smartcards could be added.
>
> Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keychain_%28Mac_
On 07/01/2010 03:14 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 07/01/2010 02:53 PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
>> I don't see why would it be bad to expose the token info flags field itself.
>
> It might be fine. What my patch does is expose new flags _in the same
> manner as existing flags are exposed_; if you want t
On 07/01/2010 02:53 PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
> I don't see why would it be bad to expose the token info flags field itself.
It might be fine. What my patch does is expose new flags _in the same
manner as existing flags are exposed_; if you want to rework the libp11
API to give direct access to tok
Just a quick note that Apple Keychain is free, open source software
released under the terms of the APSL. So it seems that a better support
for smartcards could be added.
Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keychain_%28Mac_OS%29
Kind regards,
Jean-Michel
--
Jean-Michel Pour
Martin Paljak wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 14:07 , Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
>
>> I cannot lock my Feitian PKI card.
>>
> If you can not lock your card, why bother with unlocking :)
>
>
>> Do you think tries left is implemented in the entersafe driver?
>>
>
> No, entersafe dr
I don't see why would it be bad to expose the token info flags field itself.
On Jul 1, 2010, at 14:36 , Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 07/01/2010 01:28 PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
>> for a PIN or if PIN verification fails with CKR_PIN_LOCKED (which is
>> SC_ERROR_AUTH_METHOD_BLOCKED in libopensc).
>>
>
On 07/01/2010 01:28 PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
> for a PIN or if PIN verification fails with CKR_PIN_LOCKED (which is
> SC_ERROR_AUTH_METHOD_BLOCKED in libopensc).
>
> If triest left is implemented by the driver and available,
> CKF_USER_PIN_LOCKED token flag can also be used to detect a locked
> PI
On Jul 1, 2010, at 14:07 , Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> I cannot lock my Feitian PKI card.
If you can not lock your card, why bother with unlocking :)
> Do you think tries left is implemented in the entersafe driver?
No, entersafe driver does not seem to implement tries left handling, as
Dear Martin,
I cannot lock my Feitian PKI card. Do you think tries left is
implemented in the entersafe driver?
Kind regards,
Jean-Michel
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 13:28 +0300, Martin Paljak wrote:
> When pkcs15-tool --list-pins shows for a zero tries left:
> PIN [PIN2]
> Com. Flags: 0x0
>
Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE a écrit :
> Simple question, I found no answer.
>
>
pkcs11-tool -I -l
Cryptoki version 2.20
Manufacturer OpenSC (www.opensc-project.org)
Library smart card PKCS#11 API (ver 0.0)
Please enter User PIN:
error: PKCS11 function C_Login failed: rv = CKR_PIN_LOCK
On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:47 , Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> Simple question, I found no answer.
Simple:
When pkcs15-tool --list-pins shows for a zero tries left:
PIN [PIN2]
Com. Flags: 0x0
ID: 02
Flags : [0x00]
Length: min_len:5, max_len:12, stor
Simple question, I found no answer.
Kind regards,
Jean-Michel
--
Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc
On Jul 1, 2010, at 09:59 , Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> * More Mac OS X and GNU/Linux frontends
Java is available on Linux and Mac OS X, which makes a Java front-end useful
universally. From personalization perspective, pushing opensc-pkcs11
personalization capabilities to the limits it has
Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 09:45 +0200, Anders Rundgren wrote:
>> I'm also curious about this. They (MSFT) claim that minidriver is
>> the future but it is just an abstraction layer, you still need a
>> driver although a simple(r) one.
>
> I have no idea how MSFT wo
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 09:45 +0200, Anders Rundgren wrote:
>
> I'm also curious about this. They (MSFT) claim that minidriver is
> the future but it is just an abstraction layer, you still need a
> driver although a simple(r) one.
I have no idea how MSFT works.
We ordered Feitian some MSFT tok
ean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> * USB key support beyond CCID
>
> It seems that MS Windows incorporates a mechanism which allows USB token
> to work without driver. So there is probably a standard. It would be
> nice to hear from that standard.
I'm also curious about this. They (MSFT) clai
Dear all,
As Martin is announcing projects. I would like to point out some
priorities from a user point of view.
This is my own opinion and it does not interfere with Martin's projects.
* More Mac OS X and GNU/Linux frontends
Now that we have a reliable Feitian PKI card and token, we need good
18 matches
Mail list logo
