Le 3 avril 2012 00:30, Viktor Tarasov a écrit :
> Le 02/04/2012 10:01, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit :
>> Le 2 avril 2012 09:56, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE a écrit :
I don't think there is.
>>> Here is the address of the secure messaging branch:
>>> https://github.com/viktorTarasov/OpenSC-SM/tree/
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> >> on the SM branch use: "git format-patch origin" to get the changes
> >> in individual patch files.
> >> on the gerrit/staging use: "git am my_patch" for all the previously
> >> generated patches.
> >
> > I would avoid doing this manually. git rebase really is the way to
Viktor Tarasov wrote:
> How the 'staging', that you are working on, is related to the
> 'staging' branch of the OpenSC.git from github ?
> Looking onto the git workflow
> (https://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/DevelopmentPolicy)
> I do not quite understand the place of 'staging' on the
> opens
Le 02/04/2012 10:01, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit :
> Le 2 avril 2012 09:56, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE a écrit :
>>> I don't think there is.
>> Here is the address of the secure messaging branch:
>> https://github.com/viktorTarasov/OpenSC-SM/tree/secure-messaging
>>
>> We are using it, as it includes
Le 2 avril 2012 13:30, helpcrypto helpcrypto a écrit :
> INPUT:
> http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/UsingOpensc
Now fixed.
Thanks
--
Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opens
INPUT:
http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/UsingOpensc
OUTPUT:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "build/bdist.linux-x86_64/egg/trac/web/api.py", line 440, in send_error
data, 'text/html')
File "build/bdist.linux-x86_64/egg/trac/web/chrome.py", line 827, in
render_template
Le 2 avril 2012 12:12, Peter Stuge a écrit :
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> >> 1. rebase the SM branch over the OpenSC version in gerrit/staging
>> >
>> > Okay. So all we need is a diff between SM and staging?
>>
>> No. What you need is to extract all the SM patches and apply them
>> on the gerrit/s
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> >> 1. rebase the SM branch over the OpenSC version in gerrit/staging
> >
> > Okay. So all we need is a diff between SM and staging?
>
> No. What you need is to extract all the SM patches and apply them
> on the gerrit/staging branch.
> Of course some conflicts are expecte
Le lundi 02 avril 2012 à 10:46 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit :
> No. What you need is to extract all the SM patches and apply them on
> the gerrit/staging branch.
> Of course some conflicts are expected and need to be fixed.
>
> What I would do (but I am not a git expert)
> on the SM branch use:
Le 2 avril 2012 10:34, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE a écrit :
> Dear all,
>
>> 1. rebase the SM branch over the OpenSC version in gerrit/staging
>> You do not need extra power for that. It is just normal developer
>> work.
>
> Okay. So all we need is a diff between SM and staging?
No. What you need
Dear all,
> 1. rebase the SM branch over the OpenSC version in gerrit/staging
> You do not need extra power for that. It is just normal developer
> work.
Okay. So all we need is a diff between SM and staging?
Kind regards,
--
Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu
Le 2 avril 2012 09:56, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE a écrit :
>> I don't think there is.
>
> Here is the address of the secure messaging branch:
> https://github.com/viktorTarasov/OpenSC-SM/tree/secure-messaging
>
> We are using it, as it includes most fixes.
>
> Binaries are published in:
> http://w
> I don't think there is.
Here is the address of the secure messaging branch:
https://github.com/viktorTarasov/OpenSC-SM/tree/secure-messaging
We are using it, as it includes most fixes.
Binaries are published in:
http://www.opensc-project.org/downloads/nightly/sm/
Why not use Opensc-SM for Op
Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> community, is there a way to agree to switch the 'public
> staging' to 'SM' and use it as a principal base for releases?
I don't think there is.
//Peter
pgpmvOdeyPmxt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
opensc-devel
Le dimanche 01 avril 2012 à 23:21 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit :
> No one volunteered to help. As I wrote in my initial email, I now do
> plan for option 3.
Ludovic, please listen to us.
There is also the option 4, proposed by Viktor:
Anyway, now that you plan to reject ALL patches from Jerr
15 matches
Mail list logo
