On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 20:54 +0100, Andreas Kroehnert wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> ( To mess it up even more SafeNet now renamed/rebranded the ikey 4000
> to eToken 5000)
FWIW, SafeNet bought DataKey and the DataKey Card Operating System
(DKCOS) (which RainBow had licensed from DataKey BTW) and SafeNe
On 2/28/2012 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> On 2012-02-28 12:53, Andy Walls wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 06:33 -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 12:23 -0700, Anthony Foiani wrote:
Andy, Ludovic --
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Ludovic Rousseau
wrot
On 2012-02-28 12:53, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 06:33 -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 12:23 -0700, Anthony Foiani wrote:
>>> Andy, Ludovic --
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Ludovic Rousseau
>>> wrote:
Le 27 février 2012 18:46, Anthony Foiani a
>>>
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 06:33 -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 12:23 -0700, Anthony Foiani wrote:
> > Andy, Ludovic --
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Ludovic Rousseau
> > wrote:
> > > Le 27 février 2012 18:46, Anthony Foiani a
> > > écrit :
> >
> > The situation is ac
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 12:23 -0700, Anthony Foiani wrote:
> Andy, Ludovic --
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Ludovic Rousseau
> wrote:
> > Le 27 février 2012 18:46, Anthony Foiani a écrit
> > :
> >> Now to see if there's an easy way to tell the difference between these
> >> two types of iK
This document found by Google, and located at NIST, has some interesting
information:
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/140sp/140sp943.pdf
It looks like it defines many of the additional provisioning commands
(But does not list the actual APDUs for these) that would allow the i
On 2/27/2012 1:54 PM, Andreas Kroehnert wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> I think its more beneficial to respond to this list, rather than just your
> comment you left on the blog.
>
> The little OpenCT patch I've done was originally done for the "standard" ikey
> 4000 (04b9:1206). But should also work
Andreas, greetings --
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Andreas Kroehnert
wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> I think its more beneficial to respond to this list, rather than just your
> comment you left on the blog.
Of course. Thank you for replying so quickly and so thoroughly!
> The little OpenCT pat
Hi Anthony,
I think its more beneficial to respond to this list, rather than just your
comment you left on the blog.
The little OpenCT patch I've done was originally done for the "standard" ikey
4000 (04b9:1206). But should also work for the "non-standard" one (04b9:1400).
I am not sure what t
Andy, Ludovic --
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Ludovic Rousseau
wrote:
> Le 27 février 2012 18:46, Anthony Foiani a écrit :
>> Now to see if there's an easy way to tell the difference between these
>> two types of iKey4000...
>
> You can use the "lsusb" command on GNU/Linux to display the US
Le 27 février 2012 18:46, Anthony Foiani a écrit :
> Ludovic --
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Ludovic Rousseau
> wrote:
>> The second one [04B9:1400] is listed in the "Should work but untested by me"
>> CCID list
>> http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid/shouldwork.html#0x04B90x1400
>>
>
Anthony Foiani wrote:
>Ludovic --
>
>On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Ludovic Rousseau
> wrote:
>> The second one [04B9:1400] is listed in the "Should work but untested
>by me" CCID list
>> http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid/shouldwork.html#0x04B90x1400
>>
>> So it should work out of the box
Ludovic --
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Ludovic Rousseau
wrote:
> The second one [04B9:1400] is listed in the "Should work but untested by me"
> CCID list
> http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid/shouldwork.html#0x04B90x1400
>
> So it should work out of the box with my CCID driver.
That's
Le 27 février 2012 01:54, Anthony Foiani a écrit :
> Although it looks like the iKey4000 comes in two flavors, one that is
> CCID-compliant, and one that isn't?
>
> 04B9:1206 - no CCID, not supported
> 04B9:1400 - CCID, supported by libccid?
>
> (This is from http://wiki.debian.org/Smartcards )
T
Andy --
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
>
> I added basic support for the embedded "card reader" but did nothing for the
> actual embedded "smart card". I got very busy and didn't have time to pursue
> it.
Understood. Thanks for the update!
> I will post a patch to the li
Anthony Foiani wrote:
>Greetings!
>
>I found your message from last fall on the OpenSC devel list:
>
>http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2011-October/017307.html
>
>Have you been able to make any progress with this token?
>
>I'm in a similar situation, if not more extreme: I wou
16 matches
Mail list logo