Le 10/06/2011 19:01, Martin Paljak a écrit :
> Hello,
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 19:40 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>
>> Le 08/06/2011 15:10, Viktor Tarasov a écrit :
>>> Le 08/06/2011 14:31, Martin Paljak a écrit :
Hello,
On Jun 7, 2011, at 19:15 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>> Seems reasonable. Wil
Hello,
On Jun 8, 2011, at 19:40 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
> Le 08/06/2011 15:10, Viktor Tarasov a écrit :
>> Le 08/06/2011 14:31, Martin Paljak a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>> On Jun 7, 2011, at 19:15 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
> Seems reasonable. Will see how it affects the size of the installer.
>
Le 08/06/2011 18:40, Viktor Tarasov a écrit :
> Le 08/06/2011 15:10, Viktor Tarasov a écrit :
>> Le 08/06/2011 14:31, Martin Paljak a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>> On Jun 7, 2011, at 19:15 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
> Seems reasonable. Will see how it affects the size of the installer.
The diff
Le 08/06/2011 14:31, Martin Paljak a écrit :
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 19:15 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>> What's happened with the Spanish card?
> It went something like this:
> - Some company/organization in Spain takes OpenSC, hack their driver,
> publish the result (no source)
> - Juan Antonio not
Le 08/06/2011 15:10, Viktor Tarasov a écrit :
> Le 08/06/2011 14:31, Martin Paljak a écrit :
>> Hello,
>> On Jun 7, 2011, at 19:15 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
Seems reasonable. Will see how it affects the size of the installer.
>>>
>>> The difference in size will be around 1M (both pkcs#11 and min
Le 08/06/2011 14:31, Martin Paljak a écrit :
> Hello,
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 19:15 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>>> Seems reasonable. Will see how it affects the size of the installer.
>>
>> The difference in size will be around 1M (both pkcs#11 and minidriver are
>> static) .
> Hmm... Given that the cur
Hello,
On Jun 7, 2011, at 19:15 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>>>
>> Seems reasonable. Will see how it affects the size of the installer.
>
>
> The difference in size will be around 1M (both pkcs#11 and minidriver are
> static) .
Hmm... Given that the current installer weights around 1.8M, adding an
Le 07/06/2011 16:30, Martin Paljak a écrit :
> Hello,
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 18:53 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>
>> Le 06/06/2011 15:31, Martin Paljak a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>> On May 29, 2011, at 10:05 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>> I have a xulrunner application that uses the old modified version of
>>
Hello,
On Jun 6, 2011, at 18:53 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
> Le 06/06/2011 15:31, Martin Paljak a écrit :
>> Hello,
>> On May 29, 2011, at 10:05 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
> I have a xulrunner application that uses the old modified version of
> opensc.dll and that needs to be used with the actu
Le 06/06/2011 15:31, Martin Paljak a écrit :
> Hello,
> On May 29, 2011, at 10:05 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
I have a xulrunner application that uses the old modified version of
opensc.dll and that needs to be used with the actual OpenSC PKCS#11 module
.
Static linking will allow
Hello,
On May 29, 2011, at 10:05 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>>
>>> I have a xulrunner application that uses the old modified version of
>>> opensc.dll and that needs to be used with the actual OpenSC PKCS#11 module .
>>> Static linking will allow the peaceful cohabitation.
>> I would suggest statica
Le 29/05/2011 01:13, Martin Paljak a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On May 28, 2011, at 22:47 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>
>> Le 28/05/2011 22:26, Martin Paljak a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On May 28, 2011, at 22:07 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
I would like to link statically the PKCS#11 module for Windows,
>>>
Hello,
On May 28, 2011, at 22:47 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
> Le 28/05/2011 22:26, Martin Paljak a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> On May 28, 2011, at 22:07 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>>> I would like to link statically the PKCS#11 module for Windows,
>>> or at least to include the static version of this modu
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Viktor Tarasov
wrote:
> Le 28/05/2011 22:17, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
>>
>> This is only for MSC build, not for mingw.
>> But as this project is going to MSC release anyway...
>
> I'm looking to have this static module in MSI.
> Do you think that the same should be
Le 28/05/2011 22:17, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
> This is only for MSC build, not for mingw.
> But as this project is going to MSC release anyway...
I'm looking to have this static module in MSI.
Do you think that the same should be done for the MINGW build?
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Vikt
Le 28/05/2011 22:26, Martin Paljak a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On May 28, 2011, at 22:07 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>> I would like to link statically the PKCS#11 module for Windows,
>> or at least to include the static version of this module into the MSI .
> Why?
It's a question of using of the different
Hello,
On May 28, 2011, at 22:07 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
> I would like to link statically the PKCS#11 module for Windows,
> or at least to include the static version of this module into the MSI .
Why?
--
@MartinPaljak.net
+3725156495
___
opensc-devel
This is only for MSC build, not for mingw.
But as this project is going to MSC release anyway...
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Viktor Tarasov
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to link statically the PKCS#11 module for Windows,
> or at least to include the static version of this module into t
Hello,
I would like to link statically the PKCS#11 module for Windows,
or at least to include the static version of this module into the MSI .
Here in attachment there in the diff for the build procedure (it presumes the
change of link mode for the actual PKCS#11 module dll).
Have you any obje
19 matches
Mail list logo
