Nikolay Elenkov wrote:
> On 2010/12/09 20:22, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
>
>> Victor, that's a very good idea to use standard MSI generated with WiX!
>>
>> Instead of adding 'Program Files\OpenSC' directory to PATH, it might be
>> better to put all the deps (libopensc.dll, zlib.dll, iconv.dll, etc)
>
On 2010/12/09 20:22, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Victor, that's a very good idea to use standard MSI generated with WiX!
>
> Instead of adding 'Program Files\OpenSC' directory to PATH, it might be
> better to put all the deps (libopensc.dll, zlib.dll, iconv.dll, etc)
> into WinSxS [1] and only put the
On 12/07/2010 10:43 AM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> The Gemalto and Oberthur (in the recent versions) middlewares install
> their DLLs into the 'Program Files'.
> My hidden motivation to do the same for the OpenSC MSI is that I do not
> managed to build the MSI
> that un-installs the DLLs installed in
Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> Nikolay Elenkov wrote:
>
>> On 2010/12/07 16:03, Martin Paljak wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Nikolay Elenkov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 2010/12/07 2:36, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>> [1]
>> http://www.o
Nikolay Elenkov wrote:
> On 2010/12/07 16:03, Martin Paljak wrote:
>
>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Nikolay Elenkov wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 2010/12/07 2:36, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>>>
>>>
> [1]
> http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/WindowsInstaller#PossibleinstallerstepsWin
On 2010/12/07 16:03, Martin Paljak wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Nikolay Elenkov wrote:
>
>> On 2010/12/07 2:36, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>>
>>>
[1]
http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/WindowsInstaller#PossibleinstallerstepsWindowsenvironmentdescription
>>> Here the Op
On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Nikolay Elenkov wrote:
> On 2010/12/07 2:36, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>
>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/WindowsInstaller#PossibleinstallerstepsWindowsenvironmentdescription
>>>
>> Here the OpenSC dlls are installed into 'system32'.
>> Can an a
On 2010/12/07 2:36, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>
>> [1]
>> http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/WindowsInstaller#PossibleinstallerstepsWindowsenvironmentdescription
>>
> Here the OpenSC dlls are installed into 'system32'.
> Can an alternative method, like changing of the 'PATH' variable, be a
Martin Paljak wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>
>> to reflect the commonly used template for the path to the windows registers
>> that the smart card producers are using
>>
> Following the common practices of a platform is a good idea. Yet it sometimes
> feel t
Hello,
On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> to reflect the commonly used template for the path to the windows registers
> that the smart card producers are using
Following the common practices of a platform is a good idea. Yet it sometimes
feel there is too much unnecessary bloat
Hi,
to reflect the commonly used template for the path to the windows registers
that the smart card producers are using
([HKEY_...]Software\[Manufacturer]\[ProductName]),
I would like to add one more level to the OpenSC windows registers path.
To finally have:
RegOpenKeyEx(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, "So
11 matches
Mail list logo
