Do you mean the one they made mainly for IronPython and IronRuby? I can
dig up the mail for that on the IronPython list, but it is mainly to
keep OSS source out of internal Microsoft boundaries where they want to
make sure there is no mix between internal code and external OSS code,
as their st
It's also worth noting that MS released a somewhat FOSS (I'm a little unsure
which of their licenses they used and whether it's an OSI one or not)
implementation of .NET for Linux called 'Rotor'.
Adam
> -Original Message-
> From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
Yeah, I did miss reasonable fees.
However, it is widely believed that the Novell/MS pact disclaims these. I would
highly suggest bringing this one over to the Mono mailing list, they have a lot
more experience dealing with these claims.
Adam
> -Original Message-
> From: opensim-dev-bou
In other words,
Why don't you take this to the Mono development e-mail list. Because
i'm sure that they have a lot more experience dealing with people who
cherry pick the Microsoft/Mono thing.OpenSimulator is in
.NET/Mono.That's the way it is. If you want to rewrite it in
your favorite
You might as well let us know what simulator you actually support here
while you're at it. If it isn't OpenSimulator on .NET/Mono, that's
cool.
Best Regards
Teravus
On 4/5/09, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Rick Moen -
>
> From: Rick Moen
> Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 08:44:
- Forwarded message from Rick Moen -
From: Rick Moen
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 08:44:08 -0700
To: linux-eliti...@zgp.org
Subject: Re: [linux-elitists] [Opensim-dev] Mono considered harmful
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403
Quoting Eugen Leitl (eu...@leitl.org):
> IANAL, does below explan
Perhaps it might be a good idea to have a list of known suspects who can
volunteer to test on a selection of platform combinations, and check a
box next to that configuration when it has been tested against a
specific release? Then perhaps put mantis reports specific to a certain
combination (linke
> However, given that this means source releases magically appear
> shortly after tags, I'd recommend just tagging off 0.6.4.1-release,
> 0.6.4.2-release, etc when fixes go in that should release to the world.
Good call, Sean; I think that should be how we do it. At least, we could tag it
on
God tools are mostly for Secondlife and the Linden infrastructure, opensim
does not use them currently, except for very limited set of functions, but
none of the god tools work as they do on the linden grid, you will need to
edit your xml configurations and restart your simulator, also, OpenSim Web
It's at least unlikely that the God functionality you're looking for is
implemented; but if it is, you'd probably need to Request Admin Status from
the Advanced menu on the client first, and have that functionality fully
supported on the server side first before any of this has any hope of
success.
The god tools are not implemented. I don't consider it likely that
they would be, since some things they would modify are set in .ini
or .xml files in opensim, which can't be changed from the viewer.
Melanie
Jason Fisher wrote:
> When I enter god mode, And go into god tools in the admin menu, c
When I enter god mode, And go into god tools in the admin menu, change
region name or basicly nothing works. Is their a module to fix that?
Also, does anyone know a free webhost that will host the opensim web
interface wiredux with curl, mysql connections and php? Thanks!
__
Thanks for this clarification Sean. I am learning more all the time about
revisions/trunks better.
-Original Message-
From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de
[mailto:opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Sean Dague
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 11:30 PM
To: opensim-dev@lis
Great summary and a really useful addition to build. ++
-tommi
___
Opensim-dev mailing list
Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
14 matches
Mail list logo
