Darren J Moffat wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
## Part 1.8: Enable default prompt (PS1) for interactive shells
The 1.8 portion of this project specifies to define a default prompt
(PS1) in /etc/ksh.kshrc for interactive ksh93 shell sessions to
improve end-user usabilty if the user did
John Plocher wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Plocher/jek3:
Is there a way to get the CC: thing fixed for an ARC case which is
already running ?
Done. All mail sent to PSARC-ext@ from now on will automatically
be Bcc'd to ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org (unless, of
course, the
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
[snip]
Part 5: Enhancement of /usr/bin/sum
The 5th part of this project specifies an enhancement to
/usr/bin/sum and a new ksh93 built-in with the same name based on
the ATT AST sum command. The ATT version of the sum utility
provides
Roland Mainz wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
[snip]
I had access to a T2000 machine and several Ultra40+45 machines (thanks
to Jesse Silver) at the OpenSolaris Summit 2007 and did some
benchmarking. It seems that the code for the sum builtin (e.g. calling
sum has
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
[snip]
Part 5: Enhancement of /usr/bin/sum
The 5th part of this project specifies an enhancement to
/usr/bin/sum and a new ksh93 built-in with the same name based on
the ATT AST sum command. The ATT version of the sum utility
provides
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Please use libmd(3lib) unless there is a very compelling reason not to
do so - if there I would like to see that documented here.
There is no compelling reason, however I would prefer to defer this to
the putback following the one we've
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
The short answer is No. This isn't the way OpenSolaris integration
works.
You did see the comment that I said ... yes, we will do it... ?
Yes I did.
We don't integrate what is determined to be the less optional
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:55:25 +0100 Roland Mainz wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
The short answer is No. This isn't the way OpenSolaris integration works.
You did see the comment that I said ... yes, we will do it... ?
We could probably accept a modified proposal that
Hi Alan,
Had never seen this case before, but it certainly should do the main function of
locking the display with the running screensaver utility.
But, at the moment it doesn't support CDE though. I'm sure that it could be made
to do so if it's found that we should, I guess that is something
Hi Alan,
In the setting of the force_rebuild flag in a post-install, will this flag then
be reset to false after the forced rebuild has been done or will it persist
through reboots and end up forcing a rebuild every time?
Thanks,
Darren.
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I am sponsoring this fasttrack
Jyri Virkki wrote:
Darren Kenny wrote:
Where do these bits end up by default? $HOME, `pwd`, somewhere else?
By default it will install in python_home/site-packages (in our
case /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages. If you attempt to do this
when you don't have permissions, it returns with the
Sheesh, apologies for wasting bandwidth - it was just pointed out to me that the
answer was already there, that'll teach me to send e-mails early in morning
after a late night...
Darren.
Darren Kenny wrote:
Hi Alan,
In the setting of the force_rebuild flag in a post-install, will this flag
Hi,
Updated arc draft attached, the changes are:
change these
| apache_receive_request
| apache_log_request
| apache_create_child
| apache_accept_connection
| apache_check_user
| apache_check_access
| apache_check_authorization
| dtrace_register_hooks
to the provider names as
was scrubbed...
Name: gmime_one_page.txt
URL:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080213/fb6b2be9/attachment.txt
I have missed any other point, feel free
to raise.
Thanks,
-Ghee
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: gtkmm-LSARC-2008-074-revised-13Feb2008.txt
URL:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080213
/attachments/20080213/071966c4/attachment.txt
Darren Kenny wrote:
Hi Alan,
In the setting of the force_rebuild flag in a post-install, will this flag
then
be reset to false after the forced rebuild has been done or will it persist
through reboots and end up forcing a rebuild every time?
The method script resets it every time it's
: opinion-draft.txt
URL:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080213/ae5e8a7a/attachment.txt
This fasttrack has timed out, without any significant comments, and as
there is no meeting this week, I'm marking it approved.
-- Garrett
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:11:29PM -0800, John Fischer wrote:
Image Uncommitted Python module
ImageChops Uncommitted Python module
[ ... ]
These are all prefixed with PIL., right? That is, PIL.Image, etc, are
the full module
Lid
---
GPM allows the user to set actions for lid close such as suspend,
hibernate, and shutdown. Suspend and hibernate actions will be
Power Button
GPM allows for the configuration of power button actions such as
shutdown, suspend, and hibernate. These actions will
Gary Winiger wrote:
Lid
---
GPM allows the user to set actions for lid close such as suspend,
hibernate, and shutdown. Suspend and hibernate actions will be
Power Button
GPM allows for the configuration of power button actions such as
shutdown, suspend, and hibernate. These
Jerry:
A few minor comments.
- If you are going to update the ARC materials anyway, I think you
should add information to section 4.1 explaining how Gmime relates to
the FreeDesktop MIME specification, gnome-mime-data, shared-mime-info,
etc. You already answered this question in the
From Phi.Tran at sun.com Wed Feb 13 12:34:52 2008
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:44:12 -0800
From: Phi Tran Phi.Tran at sun.com
Subject: Re: GNOME Power Management Support [PSARC/2008/021 FastTrack timeout
01/23/2008]
To: Gary Winiger gww at eng.sun.com
Cc: PSARC-ext at sun.com, dchieu at
Gary Winiger wrote:
From Phi.Tran at sun.com Wed Feb 13 12:34:52 2008
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:44:12 -0800
From: Phi Tran Phi.Tran at sun.com
Subject: Re: GNOME Power Management Support [PSARC/2008/021 FastTrack timeout
01/23/2008]
To: Gary Winiger gww at eng.sun.com
Cc: PSARC-ext at sun.com,
How does this project meet the audit requirements for
auditing a system discontinuity?
Before this project, when the system is shutdown (halt(1M),
reboot(1M), uadmin(1M)), an audit record is written indicating
the start of a discontinuity, the audit trail is flushed to
IMPO, a replacement of the event counter by cumulative spin
time does not look like the equal swap. The replacement will
hide some sense in system's behavior and in the nature of lock
contention. So, adding the spin time to the metric of spin count,
but not replacing it, will realty provide a
Gary Winiger wrote:
How does this project meet the audit requirements for
auditing a system discontinuity?
Before this project, when the system is shutdown (halt(1M),
reboot(1M), uadmin(1M)), an audit record is written indicating
the start of a discontinuity, the audit trail is
Phi Tran wrote:
Gary Winiger wrote:
How does this project meet the audit requirements for
auditing a system discontinuity?
Before this project, when the system is shutdown (halt(1M),
reboot(1M), uadmin(1M)), an audit record is written indicating
the start of a
The auditing of suspend is handled by the uadmin.c code. It creates an
audit record and the ends the auditing session before the actual
This should say it ends the auditing not the ends like some bad movie.
suspend.
Phi
Not really. When the kernel resumes, I would presume it stats
at the next kernel instruction following the instruction that
caused it to go into suspended animation. I would presume it
does not run genuinx:main() again that starts the system fresh
in a reboot, so
I am sponsoring this case for Niveditha Rau of the X11 Engineering team,
and have marked it closed approved automatic as it simply adds a new
command option that is in the current X11R7 release of xwd from X.Org.
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun
I am sponsoring this case for Nivedita Rau of the X11 Engineering team.
I have marked it closed approved automatic as it simply imports two new
options that X.Org has added in the latest X11R7 releases of xwud.
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun
Not really. When the kernel resumes, I would presume it stats
at the next kernel instruction following the instruction that
caused it to go into suspended animation. I would presume it
does not run genuinx:main() again that starts the system fresh
in a reboot,
Gary Winiger wrote:
Not really. When the kernel resumes, I would presume it stats
at the next kernel instruction following the instruction that
caused it to go into suspended animation. I would presume it
does not run genuinx:main() again that starts the system fresh
in
Danek Duvall wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 04:44:44PM -0600, Brian Cameron wrote:
Any word from the compiler folks about how they'd like to see this project
move forward? Or should we just let it time out as specified (with the
interfaces changed to Committed)?
Exactly. Although there
I'm sponsoring the following fast-track for Casper Dik (FGAP). This case
instantiates a set of Consolidation Private interfaces to permit fine-
grained policy checks by a user-level policy daemon. This case has Micro
binding and the timer is set for next Wednesday Feb 20th.
-Mike
---8---
1.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:02:46PM -0800, Hugh McIntyre wrote:
Danek Duvall wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 04:44:44PM -0600, Brian Cameron wrote:
Any word from the compiler folks about how they'd like to see this project
move forward? Or should we just let it time out as specified (with the
38 matches
Mail list logo
