I redacted this case today. Presuming I did it correctly, it should
be published to the OpenSolaris ARC web site the next time the site
update scripts run.
I presume John Plocher will contact me if I've not been complete in
my recaction as the update scripts won't publish.
Excellent, thanks.
Danek Duvall ??:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:46:33PM -0600, Jim Walker wrote:
Danek Duvall wrote:
Missing are the classes and methods that are, presumably, part of the
Public interface of any Java module intended for use by developers. Or
are
there no Private classes and methods
Jim Walker ??:
Danek Duvall wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:46:33PM -0600, Jim Walker wrote:
Danek Duvall wrote:
Missing are the classes and methods that are, presumably, part of the
Public interface of any Java module intended for use by developers.
Or are
there no Private classes and
First let me say I fully support what this case is providing and the way
it is providing it. Particularly the fact that the hostid is in the
clear!
However this directly conflicts with PSARC/2007/078, in particular the
long discussion that was had in that case the resulted in the (in my
Just to make sure this has been covered:
PSARC/2007/078 (hostids for x86) mentions the legal implications of
software licensing against hostids. This case proposes that the hostids
are user-supplied, thus may need a Sun Legal check too.
Brian
Gerald Jelinek wrote:
I am sponsoring this
Materials have been posted in the case directory under a
materials directory. This case is scheduled for review
at next weeks meeting.
--
-
Rick Matthews email: Rick.Matthews at sun.com
Sun
I've deposited materials from the project team in the
'inception.materials' directory and fixed two problems with the IAM
file: it was set to closed Exposure (the 1-pager clearly said
open; I don't know what happened there), and the inception is on
10/29, not yesterday.
--
James Carlson, Solaris
We (PSARC/2007/078) have talked to this team about the hostid
scheme and the angst it caused with those in MDE. My understanding
is that this current team has talked to MDE to figure out the
impact of this project on their ISV's.
Margot
Brian Ruthven - Sun UK wrote:
Just to make sure this
Margot Miller wrote:
We (PSARC/2007/078) have talked to this team about the hostid
scheme and the angst it caused with those in MDE. My understanding
is that this current team has talked to MDE to figure out the
impact of this project on their ISV's.
Then I find the inconsistency distrubing
Darren J Moffat writes:
Then I find the inconsistency distrubing and it is making me want to
pull the derail lever.
Why is it acceptable to have a zone's hostid in the clear in the global
zone /etc/zone/zonename.xml for SPARC and x86 file yet it isn't
acceptable to have the hostid in the
I approve this contract as the RM for the SUPPLIER.
Anup
On Oct 22, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Don Cragun wrote:
- Begin Forwarded Message -
Return-Path: psarc-intern-list-request at sun.com
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Don Cragun don.cragun at sun.com
Both parties have now signed the contract. This case has been marked
closed approved.
- Don
Elaine,
The D-Bus service name seems to have a redundant
name of ekiga and Ekiga. I looked at an installed
system and noted that most other D-Bus services
do not have this redundancy with xchat being the
only exception but still different. Is this D-Bus
service name established by the
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I am sponsoring this fasttrack for Stuart Kreitman of the X team.
The timer is set for next Wednesday, October 22.
Having reached the timeout with no open issues, this case is now
marked as Closed Approved.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at
I am sponsoring the following self-reviewed case for myself.
It adds new archive rescan options to the Solaris link-editor
(ld). I believe it qualifies for self review:
- The new -z rescan-now option is a straightforward
variation on the existing -z rescan option.
- The idea of
:-)
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I am sponsoring this fasttrack for Stuart Kreitman of the X team.
The timer is set for next Wednesday, October 22.
Having reached the timeout with no open issues, this case is now
marked as Closed Approved.
JHi
Noce to get more than 2 vectors for MSI... just to make sure .. is this
framework purely a ddi change, or do you plan to address the lack of vectors.
Say moving to per-cpu irq instead of a global.
Cheers,
ashok
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
: Rick Matthews
Exposure: open
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20081023/94731d43/attachment.html
I am submitting this fastrack on behalf of Sreedhar Chalamalasetti.
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase %I% %G% SMI
This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
tftpd server maximum timeout
1.2. Name of Document
I am submitting this case for myself. This case proposes to
integrate quilt into SFW. Timeout is set for October 30th, 2008.
Manpages and the FOSS checklist are in the case materials directory.
This project requests a minor release binding.
Dean
1. Background
People familiar with
All,
I am sponsoring this case for David Fan. As you may recall sponsorship
of this case was requested last week. Since that time David and myself
have refined the proposal below which is archived in the case directory.
I have set the timer for Thursday, October 30th, 2008.
This case proposes
All,
I am sponsoring this case for Stefan Teleman of the SFW group. The case
directory contains this proposal. I have set the time out for Thursday,
October 30th, 2008.
This project proposes to integrate the MPFR (Multi-Precision
Floating-Point Rounding) library into a Minor release of
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 02:08:49PM -0700, John Fischer wrote:
/usr/gnu/gcc4/bin/addr2line
/usr/gnu/gcc4/bin/c++filt
/usr/gnu/gcc4/bin/gas
/usr/gnu/gcc4/bin/gld
...
The following symbolic links will be provided under /usr/gnu,
following the
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Given that 2007/078 stores the hostid in /etc/hostid (for x86 only) was
any consideration given to just using the same mechanism for zones
rather than having a different one ?
Yes, I considered it for a time but settled on the solution presented in
the case because
John Fischer writes:
This FastTrack proposes the Integration of a more recent version
of GNU binutils, which is compatible with Versions 4.3.x of the
GNU Compiler Collection [ GCC ]. [2]
Will this stuff eventually be moving to /usr/bin?
It doesn't seem to need to be in
I am sponsoring this case for myself and have marked it closed approved
automatic as it simply delivers a no-op pkgconfig file. The case
binding is micro/patch.
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 01:45:49PM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:15:06PM -0500, Dean Roehrich wrote:
/etc/bash_completion.d/quilt UncommittedBASH cmd completion file
There's currently no /etc/bash_completion.d directory. Is that defined by
any of the
James Carlson wrote:
John Fischer writes:
This FastTrack proposes the Integration of a more recent version
of GNU binutils, which is compatible with Versions 4.3.x of the
GNU Compiler Collection [ GCC ]. [2]
Will this stuff eventually be moving to /usr/bin?
Yes. The idea
+1
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I am sponsoring this case for myself and have marked it closed approved
automatic as it simply delivers a no-op pkgconfig file. The case
binding is micro/patch.
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:10:02PM -0400, Stefan Teleman wrote:
They do need to be in /usr/gnu/gcc4, because these binutils are specific
to/for GCC4. We don't know what happens when we integrate GCC5. Things
might not be backwards compatible with GCC4, and we most likely want to
keep the
Danek Duvall wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:10:02PM -0400, Stefan Teleman wrote:
They do need to be in /usr/gnu/gcc4, because these binutils are specific
to/for GCC4. We don't know what happens when we integrate GCC5. Things
might not be backwards compatible with GCC4, and we most
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:36:49PM -0400, Stefan Teleman wrote:
I thought binutils was generally pretty good about backwards
compatibility -- that you could always have the latest version on your
system and have it work with the old compilers. Is that not actually
the case, or is known not
Danek Duvall wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:36:49PM -0400, Stefan Teleman wrote:
I thought binutils was generally pretty good about backwards
compatibility -- that you could always have the latest version on your
system and have it work with the old compilers. Is that not actually
the
33 matches
Mail list logo
