Then this project need to update the package name following the upcoming
new rules.
I will update this case when the new name is finalized.
Frank.
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Cyril Plisko wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Frank Che Frank.Che at sun.com wrote:
Only authorizations seem to be explicitly addressed here. How are
executables addressed? That is the use of pfexec?
Through the profiles. There are no defaults exec attributes listed in
policy.conf.
So you're saying that the pfexec search as well as the auth
search
Updated the package name and saved the new material as spec.txt in the
case directory.
Marked this case as 'closed approved automatic 03/02/2010'.
-Frank
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On 03/ 2/10 09:35 PM, Frank Che wrote:
Then this project need to update the package name following the
upcoming
Sebastien Roy wrote:
On 03/ 2/10 01:06 PM, James Carlson wrote:
Sebastien Roy wrote:
On 03/ 1/10 11:50 PM, I. Szczesniak wrote:
Please restart the timer for 2010/067. The case directory didn't
publish its materials yet.
There are two issues with this:
1. It's not an open case
It's
While investigating the remaining testsuite failures in libstdc++, the
GNU C++ runtime library, on GCC mainline, I came across two that were
due to the fact that static destructors weren't run in the order
prescribed by the C++ Standard:
PATCH: Reguire __cxa_atexit for ext/{new,
On 02/26/10 01:17 AM, Frank Che wrote:
4.2.3 Enhance driver installation capability
Current Device Driver Utility only installs driver from IPS
repository. In
case the driver supplier provides driver in other format, or network
connection is not available(for example, network controller
On 02/26/10 04:55 PM, John Fischer wrote:
Attached is the updated proposal which is also archived (diff below).
The modification is to remove the Primary Administrator rights from
the user at install time.
PSARC 2010/067 has included this in its scope (see 2.2.3 of that case's
spec). One
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:59 AM, James Carlson carlsonj at workingcode.com
wrote:
Sebastien Roy wrote:
On 03/ 2/10 01:06 PM, James Carlson wrote:
Sebastien Roy wrote:
On 03/ 1/10 11:50 PM, I. Szczesniak wrote:
Please restart the timer for 2010/067. The case directory didn't
publish its
Mark Martin wrote:
The really fun fact is that there's an attribution to an external
developer in the commit log.
If you look at the on-ips-dev hg repo or mailing list archives, you'll
see Rich did an amazing amount of work on this project.
The ARC case only covered the changes that the
On 03/ 2/10 03:18 PM, Sebastien Roy wrote:
1.7 non-contiguous netmask support removed
--
Non-contiguous netmasks are a relic of yesteryear architectures for
which we still retain support in the kernel today, and which create
more complications than
Hi all,
The new package name will be library/desktop/gtkimageview.
Regards,
Jedy
On 03/ 2/10 02:13 PM, Qing-Ming Jeff Cai wrote:
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.69 02/15/10 SMI
This information is Copyright 2010 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working
On 03/03/10 12:12, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On 03/ 2/10 03:18 PM, Sebastien Roy wrote:
1.7 non-contiguous netmask support removed
--
Non-contiguous netmasks are a relic of yesteryear architectures for
which we still retain support in the kernel today,
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
The ARC case only covered the changes that the OpenSolaris distro used
to make to ON during the SVR4-IPS transition (things like the pkg
equivalent of mv /usr/bin/sh /usr/has/bin/sh ; ln -s ksh93 /usr/bin/sh),
since they can't do that when they get IPS packages directly
Matt,
I have extended the timer to Friday and will continue to move it as
needed until Sebastien's issue is addressed.
Having this case dependent upon 2010/067 case seems reasonable to me.
The relevant subsection is 2.2.3 -- Preconfigured administrative
accounts:
This project proposes updates to the rbac implementation.
Release binding: minor.
This case was approved at today's PSARC meeting.
Gary..
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE COUNCIL
Platform Software ARC
-
PSARC Regular Meeting time: Wednesdays 10:00-1:00pm in MPK17-3507.
03-03-2010 MEETING MINUTES
On 03/ 3/10 04:54 PM, Matt Keenan wrote:
I agree with making this case dependent on 2010/067, once it has been
reviewed/approved we can implement the required resolution within the
install space if necessary.
Great, +1 on the case given the original proposal with an amendment to
have it
Hi Sebastien.
While I am not part of the DDU team, I have been working closely with
them since my project depends heavily on their product. I worked with
them on forging the specification.
I'll answer the questions I know about and leave the others.
On 03/03/10 07:26, Sebastien Roy wrote:
John,
I agree with making this case dependent on 2010/067, once it has been
reviewed/approved we can implement the required resolution within the
install space if necessary.
regards
Matt
John Fischer wrote:
Matt,
I have extended the timer to Friday and will continue to move it as
needed
19 matches
Mail list logo
