Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Dan Mick wrote:
1) I've never heard of /dev/fbs/aperture
It's basically an open source version of xsvc included in Xorg
for Solaris systems without xsvc (really ancient Solaris x86 or
any version of Solaris SPARC).
This will definitely mark one of the major milestones for OpenSolaris.
Now, please excuse me for asking a stupid question.
When you mentioned: the IA32 binaries are linked against the nVidia hardware
accelerated
OpenGL (Solaris nVidia drivers)
Do you mean that the vVidia driver is part of the
Stefan Teleman wrote:
On 7/12/05, Tao Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is ridiculous!
So why does Solaris come with JDS/GNOME and GRUB if it is not Linux?
i don't know why, after reading this sentence, i suddenly get the urge
to reasess a few things in life.
Like reconfiguring life's
Stefan Teleman wrote:
Hi.
i have uploaded all the source code patches in the Solaris directory at KDE.
the patches are in two formats:
- context diff for each file
- full modified source file
The runConfigure scripts refer to stuff in your home directory.
There is a directory,
Question: Where does the 802 wireless fit in the OpenSolaris roadmap?
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Dan Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exec /bin/ksh -o vi
As we alrerady have discussed before, this is a really bad idea
as it may make a system unusable if /usr could not be mounted.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Riddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exec /bin/ksh -o vi
or exec /bin/ksh -o emacs
If you remove the exec you are safe.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED](work) Blog:
Dan Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mmm, aperture exists since ~ 1994.
The isal binary above is from June 21st 2005
It should be modified to check for /dev/fbs/aperture too.
1) I've never heard of /dev/fbs/aperture
2) xsvc is a hack that should be replaced by a proper /dev/mem
3) sigh.
Dan Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I've never heard of /dev/fbs/aperture
1a) I don't have one on my x86 system. It's existed since 1994 where,
exactly?
So get it from ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/ or wait for the next SchilliX
release.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg
Dan Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's basically an open source version of xsvc included in Xorg
for Solaris systems without xsvc (really ancient Solaris x86 or
any version of Solaris SPARC).
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 19:47 -1000, Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:
One of the most exciting aspects of OpenSolaris is that, if you have
been following Sun's Blogs, many Sun's developers are triple-booting
their Ferrari notebooks with WinXP, Solaris, and Ubuntu. Ubuntu is the
hippest Linux
On 7/12/05, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, no fair! You're making us GNOME guys look bad ;) Nice work on the
release - congratulations dude!
Thank you!! :-)
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
Heya,
There is a directory, /opt/fsw4sun/ referenced as well, I'm guessing its
freeware stuff built with studio 10.
yes this is the big bundle of KDE depencies (also built with
SunStudio10) which i am hoping to get rid of and share all the
dependencies with the GNOME guys in a more
--- Stefan Teleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/12/05, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The runConfigure scripts refer to stuff in your
home directory.
Oh, these sourc'ed files are just very simple env
var settings, like:
setenv QTDIR /opt/qt-3.3.4-32 or
setenv LD_RUN_PATH
ken mays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we toss in K3b? I think Kaffeine and K3b are
always a nice combo for the DVD multimedia support in
KDE.
Has k3b been modified to become portable?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefan Teleman wrote:
There is a directory, /opt/fsw4sun/ referenced as well, I'm guessing its
freeware stuff built with studio 10.
yes this is the big bundle of KDE depencies (also built with
SunStudio10) which i am hoping to get rid of and share all the
dependencies with the GNOME guys
Hey,
This is exactly what i had in mind -- i had promised Jim Grisanzio
that i would write up some of my thoughts on this and ran out of time
yesterday evening -- and the issue of common dependencies with GNOME
-- and actually with GNU/OpenSolaris -- is a major part of it. i
would really
Hey,
This is exactly what i had in mind -- i had promised Jim Grisanzio
that i would write up some of my thoughts on this and ran out of time
yesterday evening -- and the issue of common dependencies with GNOME
-- and actually with GNU/OpenSolaris -- is a major part of it. i
would really
--- Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ken mays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we toss in K3b? I think Kaffeine and K3b are
always a nice combo for the DVD multimedia support
in
KDE.
Has k3b been modified to become portable?
Jörg
We need an official DVD backend development
On 7/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
This is exactly what i had in mind -- i had promised Jim Grisanzio
that i would write up some of my thoughts on this and ran out of time
yesterday evening -- and the issue of common dependencies with GNOME
-- and actually with
Hi,
I just found an annoying cc bug:
If I call cc -xarch=amd64 -fast ... I get a 32 bit binary
If I call cc -fast -xarch=amd64 ... I get a 64 bit binary
I would expect that the fact that I did specify a -xarch option
is suddificent.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling
--- Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ken mays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has k3b been modified to become portable?
Jörg
We need an official DVD backend development
environment (something the CAB and everyone else
agrees on to 'standardized' DVD multimedia
development
ken mays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm.. Well I wasn't 'complaining' about Cd-record,
just what I ran into while getting K3b compiled and
packaged. Again, I said what **version** of CD-record
do we use as a backend moving forward. Also, I
mentioned lets mark what we think is worth porting as
John Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This does not help ud /usr is not mounted in single user emergency
mode.
/bin is a symlink to /usr/bin and when /usr is not mounted, then
there is no /bin/ksh - the bourne shell dies from the exec above.
In high end server environments,
AMD Developer's website is having a poll asking what your development platform
is.
http://developer.amd.com
Though they bias the question by listing Linux as open-source, but not Solaris
nor
FreeBSD, at least they mention Solaris specifically. Now's your chance to vote.
-- richard
This
What's even more interesting is that Ubuntu is very much aimed at
non-technical users, yet developers are flocking to it... if we'd got
that balance right with the Java Desktop System, we might still be
pushing the Linux version as hard as the Solaris one :/
(We have a plan to redress the balance
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
AMD Developer's website is having a poll asking what your development
platform is.
http://developer.amd.com
Though they bias the question by listing Linux as open-source, but not
Solaris nor
FreeBSD, at least they mention Solaris specifically.
Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solaris is doing quite well, I see. Over 25 percent and closing in.
We now have 37.9% and are on the top of the list ;-)
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
[EMAIL
On 7/12/05, Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Solaris is doing quite well, I see. Over 25 percent and closing in.
Jim
We just blew the doors off Windows. Golden.
37% and rising ...
Dennis
ps: are we really wrecking the stats or just providing more honest
On Jul 12, 2005, at 11:19 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solaris is doing quite well, I see. Over 25 percent and closing in.
We now have 37.9% and are on the top of the list ;-)
Is it submitting another vote every time I hit the refresh
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 09:48, Joerg Schilling wrote:
outside of /lib (ie nothing in /usr). So my guess would be
that simply copying /usr/bin/bash to /sbin would make it
^^
available to you in times of emergency (ie when only /
is mounted, perhaps
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 10:48, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Having /usr in a separate partition is an officially supported install
mode on Solaris. Thus giving the advise to include something like
exec /usr/bin/anything
into /.profile is a bad advise.
I'm pretty sure the original poster did not
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 14:47, Steve Logue wrote:
It appears that all of the I/O time is being mistakenly
reported in the sys category instead.
no, it's being reported in the idle time. iowait was always a funny
name for cpu idle, but there's outstanding disk i/o.
it's now reported as zero in
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 02:56 am, Bob Palowoda wrote:
Question: Where does the 802 wireless fit in the OpenSolaris roadmap?
Good question Bob, I'm not sure the answer is known, but it's being worked on.
There are people who are looking at getting the wireless drivers that Sun has
into the ON
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dan Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exec /bin/ksh -o vi
As we alrerady have discussed before, this is a really bad idea
as it may make a system unusable if /usr could not be mounted.
if I can type that command, /usr is mounted, and it works great.
When booting from
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Sunil wrote:
nobody is condemning solaris. We are all discussing what better we
can do from useability point of view and make simpler, easier
adoption.
OK, I misunderstood you. I think what you're talking about is something
teh Gentoo guys are working on.
what if I
I did a little blog pointing to the articles on opensolaris.org:
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris?entry=some_articles_on_opensolaris
We'll eventually have to link to these from the front page. There are
few more articles written and in review (Solaris on laptops, a 3rd
driver article, a kernel
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Hi,
I just found an annoying cc bug:
If I call cc -xarch=amd64 -fast ... I get a 32 bit binary
If I call cc -fast -xarch=amd64 ... I get a 64 bit binary
I would expect that the fact that I did specify a -xarch option
is suddificent.
man page has some notes on that -
Dan Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dan Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I've never heard of /dev/fbs/aperture
1a) I don't have one on my x86 system. It's existed since 1994 where,
exactly?
So get it from ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/ or wait for the
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:29:05PM -0700, Alan DuBoff wrote:
That might be nice, but higher on some folks list is to have a legitimate DVD
player that folks on Solaris would have to be able to play actual DVD movies.
That would be cool if that could happen somehow, even at a price.
Why?
On 7/12/05, Keith M Wesolowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? By legitimate you must mean 'closed source' and since there are
largely functional open source options already it would be far cooler
to help finish one of them and offer it as part of OpenSolaris. If
functionality, usability,
Jaime Cardoso wrote:
Hello People
I see several people here talking about the creation of communities
(good, good) but, I have a request for the web devs of Opensolaris.
Each community discussion forum should have a Sticky thread (a thread
always on top with no one but the community leader
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
I did a little blog pointing to the articles on opensolaris.org:
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris?entry=some_articles_on_opensolaris
We'll eventually have to link to these from the front page. There are
few more articles written and in review (Solaris on laptops, a 3rd
--- Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 07:12 am, ken mays wrote:
Nero(Linux) for Solaris? ;o
Ken,
That might be nice, but higher on some folks list is
to have a legitimate DVD
player that folks on Solaris would have to be able
to play actual DVD movies.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 7/12/05, Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Solaris is doing quite well, I see. Over 25 percent and closing in.
Jim
We just blew the doors off Windows. Golden.
37% and rising ...
18.6% Linux
19.3% Windows
58.3%
So if you like to discuss things, thell us what you
are interested in
Jörg
1. What are the latest binary versions of CD-Record
available for Solaris 8/9/10 (SPARC x86/AMD64)?
;o
Ken Mays
Sell on Yahoo!
ken mays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm all for DVD playback support. Heck, the latest
Mplayer and Xine would be nice to see properly
supported. We can always add encrypt/decrypt libraries
later if its a license issue (or whatever) but let us
at least get the applications ported as well as
ken mays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if you like to discuss things, thell us what you
are interested in
Jörg
1. What are the latest binary versions of CD-Record
available for Solaris 8/9/10 (SPARC x86/AMD64)?
The latest binary version for Solaris 8 is 2.01.01a01
For
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Cyril Plisko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I call cc -xarch=amd64 -fast ... I get a 32 bit binary
If I call cc -fast -xarch=amd64 ... I get a 64 bit binary
I would expect that the fact that I did specify a -xarch option
is suddificent.
man page has some notes
On 07/12/05 17:48, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Gavin Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, an ldd on /usr/bin/bash shows that it requires nothing
outside of /lib (ie nothing in /usr). So my guess would be
that simply copying /usr/bin/bash to /sbin would make it
available to you in times of
I check the Logs and found that the error should be the configuration of
X-server. But during the installation process, there is no way to config it.
Does anyone knows how to config it, and how to start the configuration program
for X-server?
The display is normal through out the
On 7/12/05, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Teleman wrote:
On 7/12/05, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The runConfigure scripts refer to stuff in your home directory.
Oh, these sourc'ed files are just very simple env var settings, like:
setenv QTDIR /opt/qt-3.3.4-32 or
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:58:37PM -0700, George Jereza wrote:
I'm wondering if this a statement of one individual or
We're all individuals. Corporate entities don't have fingers or vocal
cords because they're not alive.
talking about OpenSolaris and not Solaris. Kinda begs
an important
On 7/12/05, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Blastwave would appear to be a natural home for these packages, either
with a unique name or in a new directory. I have the time to build a few.
I was thinking in more general terms, is there anything to be
On 7/12/05, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the obvious questions that come to mind that we probably need to
discuss are -
o Why aren't these tools already available on Solaris?
o Why can't we use the non-GNU equivalent? And if not,
why can't we fix those
ken mays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Does CD-Record 2.01.01a01/03 provide complete DVD+R
Double Layer and DVD-R Dual Layer recording support?
NO (as I did write a few hours ago)
As I did write some days ago, I had to decide whether to work
on SchilliX or on dual layer.
3. Does Solaris
It keeps growing :)
16.8% Linux
17.3% Windows®
62.4% Solaris
2.1% FreeBSD (Unix)
2.1% Other
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
It is quite counterproductive. The numbers are so far off reality
that every reader will know immediately the vote was rigged.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 04:15:52PM -0700, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
We're all individuals.
I'm not.
Danek
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hey,
i was not referring to the GNU auto* tools, or GCC. the auto* tools
are mostly scripts (with the exception of libltdl), and they aren't
that hard to upgrade or back out. as far as GCC goes, that's a little
above my pay grade. it would be very arrogant of me to tell Sun what
compiler to
On Tue 12 Jul 2005 at 03:10PM, Diana Cionoiu wrote:
Hello,
My name is Diana and i'm a developer for a free software project called Yate
( http://yate.null.ro ). Yate works on GNU/Linux and Windows. The primary
development platform is GNU/Linux.
Some of our users will like to use Yate on
See pkgmk(1), pkgmap(4), prototype(4), and the
Application Packaging
Developer's Guide.
that is probably a good start.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 7/12/05, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The runConfigure scripts refer to stuff in your home directory.
There is a directory, /opt/fsw4sun/ referenced as well, I'm guessing its
freeware stuff built with studio 10.
i have uploaded all the build scripts (in the BUILD.TOOLS directory
63 matches
Mail list logo
