James Dickens wrote:
perhaps i'm tired... but that just comes off as LAME!
how does that come off as fully functional ... this is opensource
software... no need for secrets this started out as an opensource
project, no hidden closed sourced secrets, guess i will be skipping
this project,
But the question is, how does one modify GRUB to boot off of a CompactFlash(TM)
or a USB stick?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
James is right, look if you want to track pilot users just make them register.
Seriously...creating your own little secret society isn't going to achieve
anything.
Maybe I am getting the wrong idea as to what you are trying to achieve with the
whole password thing but anyone with but a basic
Could someone explain me why this URL contains an announcement for
BeleniX-0.2 but does not mention the release of both SchilliX-0.2 and
SchilliX-0.2.1?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This earlier email should help ...
Regards,
Moinak.
---BeginMessage---
Installing GRUB on USB stick
tested on Solaris Express Community Release b20
I wrote this guide for installing GRUB on my USB stick. Maybe someone will find
it useful. Comments or
Hi Joey!
Thank you very much for the tip, I'm now building again opensolaris (before
doing bldenv ./opensolaris.sh in my opensolaris-dir/workspace). I'm yet
waiting to end task and reboot (a few hours in my 1.6GHz P4).
Thank you!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 11:36 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Could someone explain me why this URL contains an announcement for
BeleniX-0.2 but does not mention the release of both SchilliX-0.2 and
SchilliX-0.2.1?
Berlin Triangle?
Glynn
___
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Mac wrote:
James Dickens wrote:
perhaps i'm tired... but that just comes off as LAME!
how does that come off as fully functional ... this is opensource
software... no need for secrets this started out as an opensource
project, no hidden closed sourced secrets,
Hi,
http://opensolaris.org/os/about/roadmap/ suggests that Sun storage
drivers would be released in October. Which at this stage would require
a time machine to achieve since we are in November already.
Are there any updates to the release schedule ?
Regards,
Cyril
Re, joey!!
I got the same error, man :-( I do the bldenv ./opensolaris.sh in my workspace
and rebuild again.
This is the mail_msg dropped in logs directory:
Nightly distributed build started: Wed Nov 2 09:24:51 CET 2005
Nightly distributed build completed: Wed Nov 2 14:00:31
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 05:38 am, Eric Boutilier wrote:
My 2 cents: I think it's too early to judge this project. In other
words, I think they deserve the benefit of the doubt at this point
because they say the pilot will be short and because they apparently
have put a lot of original
Iban Nieto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build errors (DEBUG)
dmake: Warning: Don't know how to make target `snoop_igmp.c'
dmake: Warning: Don't know how to make target `snoop_igmp.c'
dmake: Warning: Target `install' not remade because of errors
The following command caused the error:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:21:04AM -0800, Ch? Kristo wrote:
James is right, look if you want to track pilot users just make them
register. Seriously...creating your own little secret society isn't going to
achieve anything.
I don't mean to pile on here, but I completely disagree. Anyone
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 02:21 -0800, Ché Kristo wrote:
James is right, look if you want to track pilot users just make them
register. Seriously...creating your own little secret society isn't going to
achieve anything.
we explained already why we do pilot program first.
the rest is just yours
For a 100% free and open project, this seems pretty closed and secretive to me.
Since there's also about 2300 packages available in the repository, and more to
come, it seems to me that you don't actually need or want much help either,
because basically everything is already done. All you need
In case not seen, the news has been slashdot'd
http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/05/11/02/0418234.shtml?tid=90tid=106
Alex Ross wrote:
Nexenta OS: Debian based GNU/Solaris
==
This is to announce Nexenta OS: the Debian based GNU/Solaris
distribution.
We'll open
I'm going to have to disagree. A secret society is an exclusive club.
The GNU/Solaris (I wonder if this should be GNU/OpenSolaris since I
think Sun owns the trademark for Solaris - I dunno... Bonnie might know
better) folks have said that they will let *anyone* join who wants to.
It's a
Did you read the ReleaseNotes?
There is a big honkin' warning in there that there is a bug in the snoop
Makefile and that you need to make one change in order to build it.
This will be fixed for build 26.
cheers,
steve
Iban Nieto wrote:
Re, joey!!
I got the same error, man :-( I do the
Hi Nikhil,
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Nikhil wrote:
Paul, or is there any command line tool where I can use it to
update the test/pseudo wtmpx file with system boot message,
noting that system boot is of message type 2 according to
wtmpx/utmpx struct definition.
There's 'sessreg' from Xorg, we
I suggest 2 books:
Solaris Internals - Core Kernel Architecture, 2001 , Jim Mauro and Richard Mc
Dougall
and
Solaris Systems Programming, 2005, Rich Teer
Solaris Internals is no longer available as new (as far as I know). But you can
order it e. g. by Amazoon as second-hand book. It is 'only'
Paul Jakma wrote:
There's 'sessreg' from Xorg, we don't ship it I think,
Solaris does, OpenSolaris doesn't yet - /usr/openwin/bin/sessreg
I'm only presuming it supports the UTX functions.
The Solaris version uses utmpx - the current Xorg 6.8.2 release does
not, but I checked our sessreg
But then again comparing say the OpenSolaris release in secrecy to this is a
little bit different...with OpenSolaris you were dealing with a proprietary
codebase whereas Nexenta are all open source. I understand there are elements
of any project that may need to be hidden, but password
I think this is worded to sooth existing Solaris customers who may be under the
impression that Sun is going the way of Linux with the development model.
Insofar as I can tell Nevada and OpenSolaris are the same tree and Solaris.next
will be built from the same tree.
This message posted from
I think what most people are frustrated with is that there is a
disconnect between announcing the project far and wide, but then saying
the site needs to be locked down because it's not quite ready for
everyone. If it's not ready, don't go announcing it everywhere. If it
is ready enough for
Now we put some more information on the authentication dialog.
We are sorry we didn't do that at the first place... well. We were too
busy with other issues.
So, next time you click on http://www.gnusolaris.org you will see
Welcome to GNU/Solaris pilot program! banner and information on how to
James Lick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what most people are frustrated with is that there is a
disconnect between announcing the project far and wide, but then saying
the site needs to be locked down because it's not quite ready for
everyone. If it's not ready, don't go announcing it
26 matches
Mail list logo
