Bill Rushmore wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Roland Mainz wrote:
Actually there is the 3rd type of customer: People who write software -
they usually fall in the space between the two types. Currently Sun
simply lacks a decent development machine which is affordable by
students (Sun Blade 100 w
Hi Everyone,
I thought I'd comment on this subject because it's near and dear to my
heart. I have an Ultra60 and a Netra X1 at home that I use for testing,
designing, and every-day stuff (web, email, etc). In my profession,
it's important to stay ahead of the learning curve. While both of these
sy
John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 06:46:54PM -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
=
desktop-discuss 02/05 - 02/18
=
Eric, are these going to be regular?
Yes.
If so, is it possible they could be posted somewhere else perhaps
Bill Rushmore wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Roland Mainz wrote:
Actually there is the 3rd type of customer: People who write software -
they usually fall in the space between the two types. Currently Sun
simply lacks a decent development machine which is affordable by
students (Sun Blade 100 was
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Roland Mainz wrote:
> Actually there is the 3rd type of customer: People who write software -
> they usually fall in the space between the two types. Currently Sun
> simply lacks a decent development machine which is affordable by
> students (Sun Blade 100 was in that range) ..
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Actually there is the 3rd type of customer: People who write software -
they usually fall in the space between the two types. Currently Sun
simply lacks a decent development machine which is affordable by
students (Sun Blade 100
Ian Collins wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Actually there is the 3rd type of customer: People who write software -
they usually fall in the space between the two types. Currently Sun
simply lacks a decent development machine which is affordable by
students (Sun Blade 100 was in that range) ...
Ult
Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Roland Mainz wrote:
>
> > Background: I am looking into getting some applications related to
> > bioinformatics "ported" to Niagara. Since this processor performs
> > VERY VERY badly when floating-point instructions are used I was
> > thinking about turning
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 06:46:54PM -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> =
> desktop-discuss 02/05 - 02/18
> =
Eric, are these going to be regular? If so, is it possible they could be posted
somewhere else perhaps? I'm finding it difficult to keep
Roland Mainz wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 2/21/06, Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Felix Schulte wrote:
You can plug them together for less than 500? if you order the stuff
from alternate.de
Maybe, but will you get a 3 year warranty?
=
desktop-discuss 02/05 - 02/18
=
Threads or annoucments originated by leaders during the period:
- OpenSolaris wiki
by Glynn Foster
Size of all threads during period:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 2/21/06, Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Felix Schulte wrote:
> >
> > > You can plug them together for less than 500? if you order the stuff
> > > from alternate.de
> >
> > Maybe, but will you get a 3 year warranty?
>
> I think we have two di
Karyn Ritter wrote:
Steve will put out another nightly sync up with onnv_34 before the end of the
week. (Tomorrow?)
Probably tomorrow, possibly Thursday.
And it will be with the current-build-in-progress, which is onnv_35.
SXCR build 34 is on track for release on March 6.
excellent.
cheer
On 2/21/06, Karyn Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve will put out another nightly sync up with onnv_34 before the end of the
> week. (Tomorrow?)
>
> SXCR build 34 is on track for release on March 6.
>
Excellent .. thank you Karyn. I will keep an eye on Steve to see when
I can grab sources
zfs-discuss 02/05 - 02/18
Threads or annoucments originated by leaders during the period:
- None
Size of all threads during period:
Thread size Topic
---
Ghee Teo wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Looks like this is something I have to live with.
I tried to be as unbiased as possible, so the only name that could be used
was OpenSolaris.
I hope that Ken will read the book and make his remarks based on the
content of the book.
Note
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
I see this as complementary to (and possibly a source of additional
content for) the newsletter and summary initiatives that already exist.
Very nice, Eric. I'd love to include some of this data in the
newsletter, but I'm even more interes
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Can you get this output in a HTML format...
Well, if nothing else, for now we can always just put tags
around the plain text output.
and the nmaybe Derek can make it show up directly in an web page somewhere
I don't see why not, but I'm not sure which web page
Steve will put out another nightly sync up with onnv_34 before the end of the
week. (Tomorrow?)
SXCR build 34 is on track for release on March 6.
That is all for this week...
- Karyn
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
I use workstation... and have had wierd things with the
bridged network. Remember, you are piling a second IP onto
a single MAC address, so things like DHCP and ARPing are
sometimes broken. This can also cause problems with some
network switches that actually care about the traffic coming
thro
Hmm - it seems pinging doesn't work. I don't really know what is going on here
as the interface comes up OK, just won't send and receive. I'll just double
check the VMWare setup isn't borked
Yes, the virtual NIC is bridged onto VMnet0, the default config.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Andrew Pattison wrote:
> I've got a strange network problem running on VMWare Server Beta (new version
> of GSX server that's free). The interface seems to come up OK if I put in
> static IP config information, pings hosts OK, but then fails to do much else
> - DNS fails, a
I've got a strange network problem running on VMWare Server Beta (new version
of GSX server that's free). The interface seems to come up OK if I put in
static IP config information, pings hosts OK, but then fails to do much else -
DNS fails, and web is non-functioning. If I try DHCP, DHCP config
Mark Greenbank wrote:
> Is there a public repository for SMF configuration
> files for popular open source packages (e.g.,
> PostgreSQL)?
> If not, does anyone see a value in this? I myself am
> trying to add
> packages to a stock Solaris system and I'm finding I
> have to craft a
> lot of them by
On 2/21/06, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Dennis,
>
> Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 3:11:57 PM, you wrote:
>
> DC> On 2/21/06, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Yes the X2 will work--but how much money will you
> >> > save over a Sun X2100?
> >> > They start at less t
> I have a Pioneer DVR-107D unit ( much like your
> DVR-108 ) and it is flashed to the latest firmware from Pioneer.
> What software are you using? cdrw ? On Solaris
> Express b31 or SXCR b33 ?
cdrw. Works for me. On SXCR b28, bfu'ed to opensolaris 20060214 bits.
The PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-108 i
Hello Dennis,
Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 3:11:57 PM, you wrote:
DC> On 2/21/06, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Yes the X2 will work--but how much money will you
>> > save over a Sun X2100?
>> > They start at less than $700.
>>
>> Where? Sun store has them listed @ $745 USD.
DC> The
On Feb 21, 2006, at 8:45 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I think we have two different types of thinking here. The business
world wants to put in a server and software services that "just work"
and they have someone to call in the event of a problem. A software
support contract as well as on site ha
Felix Schulte schrieb:
On 2/21/06, Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ken wrote:
anyone have experience using solaris 10 with the amd 64 x2 processors? I am
looking to build a rather cheap low end server. TIA
Yes. ;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~$ psrinfo -vp
The physical processor has 2 virtua
Rich Teer wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, UNIX admin wrote:
Yes the X2 will work--but how much money will you
save over a Sun X2100?
They start at less than $700.
Where? Sun store has them listed @ $745 USD.
Sorry about that--my bad. For some reason I
On 2/21/06, Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Felix Schulte wrote:
>
> > You can plug them together for less than 500? if you order the stuff
> > from alternate.de
>
> Maybe, but will you get a 3 year warranty?
I think we have two different types of thinking here. The bu
On 2/21/06, Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Felix Schulte wrote:
>
> > You can plug them together for less than 500? if you order the stuff
> > from alternate.de
>
> Maybe, but will you get a 3 year warranty?
No, but I get a dual core CPU and 1 year warranty guaranteed b
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Felix Schulte wrote:
> You can plug them together for less than 500? if you order the stuff
> from alternate.de
Maybe, but will you get a 3 year warranty?
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, UNIX admin wrote:
> > Yes the X2 will work--but how much money will you
> > save over a Sun X2100?
> > They start at less than $700.
>
> Where? Sun store has them listed @ $745 USD.
Sorry about that--my bad. For some reason I was thinking of $695 as
the starting price.
--
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
On 2/21/06, Venky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neat! Why don't you add the article to the OpenSolaris wiki?
http://www.genunix.org/wiki
Venky.
or to the contents project for review
nacho
Excellent! So per my last post ("sharing articles"), I just sub
On 2/21/06, Jürgen Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > DVD+RW has more restrictions than a formatted CD-RW or DVD-RW
> > >
What software are you using for this ?
I have a Pioneer DVR-107D unit ( much like your DVR-108 ) and it is
flashed to the latest firmware from Pioneer.
Using lib
On 2/21/06, Mark Greenbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Is there a public repository for SMF configuration files for popular open
> source packages (e.g., PostgreSQL)?
>
> If not, does anyone see a value in this? I myself am trying to add packages
> to a stock Solaris system and
> > > > > (And the other limitations make incremental writing
> > > > > through the OS cumbersome except for DVD-RAM)
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, formatted DVD+RW media also has no such
> > > > restrictions, you can read/write individual 2048 byte blocks,
> > > > just like DVD-RAM.
> > >
> > > This is n
If one needs to get started without compiling sources they can try the precompiled NetBSD's pkgsrc.
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/pradhap/20051229
- PradhapOn 2/21/06, Ignacio Marambio Catán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/21/06, Venky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Neat! Why don't you add the ar
Hi everyone,
Is there a public repository for SMF configuration files for popular open source packages (e.g., PostgreSQL)?
If not, does anyone see a value in this? I myself am trying to add
packages to a stock Solaris system and I'm finding I have to craft a
lot of them by myself.
Thanks,
Mark
_
On 2/21/06, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes the X2 will work--but how much money will you
> > save over a Sun X2100?
> > They start at less than $700.
>
> Where? Sun store has them listed @ $745 USD.
The X2100 is a single core single processor system.
If you want the multi-core CPU
On 2/21/06, Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken wrote:
>
> >anyone have experience using solaris 10 with the amd 64 x2 processors? I am
> >looking to build a rather cheap low end server. TIA
> >
> Yes. ;)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~$ psrinfo -vp
> The physical processor has 2 virtual process
On 2/21/06, Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Ken wrote:
>
> > anyone have experience using solaris 10 with the amd 64 x2 processors? I am
> > looking to build a rather cheap low end server. TIA
>
> Yes the X2 will work--but how much money will you save over a Sun X2100?
Unforgently we are not able to offer free CeBIT tickets (but
this was the reason why we make the event @ sunday - on
sunday it's cheaper).
Detlef
On 02/21/06 13:17, Felix Schulte wrote:
On 2/21/06, Detlef Drewanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
the first German OpenSolaris User Group Meeting
Jürgen Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > (And the other limitations make incremental writing
> > > > through the OS cumbersome except for DVD-RAM)
> > >
> > > Hmm, formatted DVD+RW media also has no such
> > > restrictions, you can read/write individual 2048 byte blocks,
> > > just like DV
On 2/21/06, Venky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neat! Why don't you add the article to the OpenSolaris wiki?
> http://www.genunix.org/wiki
>
> Venky.
or to the contents project for review
nacho
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:55:37PM -0800, Roman wrote:
> > Hi, if anybody is using NetBSD's pkgsrc f
> > > (And the other limitations make incremental writing
> > > through the OS cumbersome except for DVD-RAM)
> >
> > Hmm, formatted DVD+RW media also has no such
> > restrictions, you can read/write individual 2048 byte blocks,
> > just like DVD-RAM.
>
> This is not true.
>
> DVD+RW has more re
On 2/21/06, Detlef Drewanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> the first German OpenSolaris User Group Meeting will be
> hosted by Sun Microsystems at the CeBIT 2006. Come, see,
> meet the specialists and have some discussion with other
> OpenSolaris enthusiasts.
Will Sun offer free CeBIT tickets fo
Hi,
the first German OpenSolaris User Group Meeting will be
hosted by Sun Microsystems at the CeBIT 2006. Come, see,
meet the specialists and have some discussion with other
OpenSolaris enthusiasts.
When:
Sunday, March 12th, 2006, 14:00 - 20:00
What:
14:00 Intro to OpenSolaris
Raju Uppalapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When copying or removing directories with lots of content, it feels like it
> takes more time to complete the same task on Solaris than on Linux.
> Is Solaris is really slower than Linux for file system related tasks?
> Is the slowness due to some defa
> Yes the X2 will work--but how much money will you
> save over a Sun X2100?
> They start at less than $700.
Where? Sun store has them listed @ $745 USD.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@op
> When copying or removing directories with lots of
> content, it feels like it takes more time to complete
> the same task on Solaris than on Linux.
> Is Solaris is really slower than Linux for file
> system related tasks?
> Is the slowness due to some default security and data
> consistency featu
> By default it should continue to do what it does
> right now. As a user if I can change some
> configuration that makes Solaris follow the file i/o
> pattern (insecure but quick) as Linux, it will
> improve my productivity.
One has to wonder about productivity improvement if the system experienc
Neat! Why don't you add the article to the OpenSolaris wiki?
http://www.genunix.org/wiki
Venky.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:55:37PM -0800, Roman wrote:
> Hi, if anybody is using NetBSD's pkgsrc framework for building
> third party software from source, then you might want to have
> a look at my g
54 matches
Mail list logo
