Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Sun lost one of it's biggest and oldest x86

2006-06-03 Thread Ignacio Marambio Catán
On 6/4/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joerg Schilling wrote: > Thomas Nau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Back to Sun itself: in my opinion they dropped the desktop many years ago >>during the dot-gone era. They forgot about their own roots and the >>university kids at the time didn

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Sun lost one of it's biggest and oldest x86

2006-06-03 Thread Jim Grisanzio
Joerg Schilling wrote: > Thomas Nau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Back to Sun itself: in my opinion they dropped the desktop many years ago >>during the dot-gone era. They forgot about their own roots and the >>university kids at the time didn't learn Solaris but Linux and those are >>the one

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Resolver is sleeping

2006-06-03 Thread Ron Halstead
Never mind : ) I decided to reload nv40 from scratch. The last time I did an upgrade install (from nv38 to nv39 and nv39 to nv40). This time, I did a initial install and the problem has gone away. I'm guessing that something (?) changed between nv 38 and nv39 that was not changed with an upgrade

Re: [osol-discuss] Adobe Acrobat for Solaris x86

2006-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 28 May 2006 06:53 am, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > A company that does not create new versions of their software in more than > > 6 years _is_ dead. > > The thing is that Adobe does create new versions of their software in less > time than you stat

Re: [osol-discuss] b40 doesn't work on T1000 servers?

2006-06-03 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Peter, Friday, June 2, 2006, 11:57:49 PM, you wrote: PE> This is all I get if I try to jumpstart a T1000 with B40 of Nevada: PE> {0} ok boot net - install PE> Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] File and args: - install PE> 1000 Mbps FDX Link up PE> Reques

[osol-discuss] Developers community/project

2006-06-03 Thread lianep
(warning: Subject change) Joerg Schilling writes: > In 2003, I switched the the main > system at home to Solaris 9 x86. [ snip ] > - I need a decent debugger like mdb/adb which is not available on Linux > > - I need full control over SCSI error codes which is not available on >

Re: GCC Issues, was (Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Adobe Acrobat for Solaris x86)

2006-06-03 Thread Moinak Ghosh
Joerg Schilling wrote: Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kaiwai Gardiner wrote: Well, I started compiling things, all nice, started to compile Xorg 7.1 and it failed to compile; Strange - it's always compiled for me with Studio compilers. I test with gcc occasionall

Re: [osol-discuss] Sun lost one of it's biggest and oldest x86 customer

2006-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Nau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Back to Sun itself: in my opinion they dropped the desktop many years ago > during the dot-gone era. They forgot about their own roots and the > university kids at the time didn't learn Solaris but Linux and those are > the ones to drive decisions today.

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Sun lost one of it's biggest and oldest x86 customer

2006-06-03 Thread UNIX admin
> Redhat's answer to jumpstart is called kickstart, it > generally works, > the problems is that if you want to install redhat > using kickstart you > need the either the redhat cds or some custom created > media to boot > from, even if it's only to make the kickstart file > available. I know. I h

Re: GCC Issues, was (Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Adobe Acrobat for Solaris x86)

2006-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kaiwai Gardiner wrote: > > Well, I started compiling things, all nice, started to compile Xorg 7.1 > > and it failed to compile; > > Strange - it's always compiled for me with Studio compilers. I test > with gcc occasionally, but there's enough othe

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Adobe Acrobat for Solaris x86

2006-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
"David J. Orman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The day when I hear geeks say, "why would I want to run Linux when > > I can run Solaris, have a great desktop, and all those awesome > > mainstream applications", then Solaris has made progress - until > > then, Solaris will remain the red hea

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Sun lost one of it's biggest and oldest x86 customer

2006-06-03 Thread Stefan Parvu
>No major IBM's SW had been open sourced, as far as I know. Exactly. IBM has done nothing to open source their software stack: z/OS, AIX, DB2, Websphere. I think they are not even looking to do that... since it is very complicated, time consuming - much easier: confuse the world with Linux, sign

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Sun lost one of it's biggest and oldest x86 customer

2006-06-03 Thread UNIX admin
> Yeah, might be true to some extent - but the reality > is different. Normally you have Windows, Solaris, > zOS, AIX, HP NonStop and maybe Linux. This is partially true, to the extent that you will have a salad of operating systems and hardware in small to midsize shops. Large shops have these

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Sun lost one of it's biggest and oldest x86 customer

2006-06-03 Thread UNIX admin
> Which important piece of IBM software was > opensourced? No major IBM's SW had been open sourced, as far as I know. Last I checked, AIX 5L was still a closed product that cost money, on top of the expensive IBM Power CPU based hardware. I wanted to get the lowest cost 1U Power based server to