[osol-discuss] Re: the grubby looking install process

2006-07-15 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
I think Dennis has a good point. We are looking at two issues that should be *really* simple to do something about. - graphic background for grub on install cd/dvd - numlock on by default What do others think? alan. Two concerns: * while the initial appearance and settings should

[osol-discuss] Solaris 10 06/06 x86 HP DL585 boot hang aftrer reboot HELP!!!

2006-07-15 Thread Dmitry
Solaris 10 06/06 x86 HP DL585 boot hang aftrer reboot when I shutdown server and power on, solaris sometimes start, and working good, sometime hang but after reboot (or init 6), usually boot hang on SunOS Release 5.10 Version Copyright ... Use is subject to license terms HELP!!! This

[osol-discuss] Re: Solaris 10 06/06 x86 HP DL585 boot hang aftrer reboot HELP!!!

2006-07-15 Thread Jean-François Ndi
Hi, you can try this: - boot in the debugger (-kd) - ::bp acpica`_init (note the backtick character) - :c When you hit the break point: - ::step over this, until you either hang or see another module getting installed. (I know, not the most elegant but it will help you determine what is

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Solaris 10 06/06 x86 HP DL585 boot hang aftrer reboot HELP!!!

2006-07-15 Thread Dana H. Myers
Jean-François Ndi wrote: Hi, you can try this: - boot in the debugger (-kd) - ::bp acpica`_init (note the backtick character) - :c When you hit the break point: - ::step over this, until you either hang or see another module getting installed. (I know, not the most elegant but

[osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal:NFS observability tools

2006-07-15 Thread David S. Collier-Brown
That sounds highly sane. For purposes of capacity planning and trending, the response time and latency of heavily-used methods are also good (meaning predictive) things to capture. [I can speak at length about that, but will refrain (;-)] --dave This message posted from opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Cdrecord 2.01.01a11 in the latest snv ?

2006-07-15 Thread Philip Brown
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 05:19:08PM -0400, James Carlson wrote: The original reason for /usr/sfw was to prevent users from wandering into External (extremely volatile; not necessarily compatible from patch to patch) software. But with GNOME integrating into /usr/bin as External and with the

Re: [osol-discuss] Getting dtterm to play nicely with GNOME 2.14...

2006-07-15 Thread Philip Brown
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:01:00AM -0400, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: Some default X resources are set in /usr/dt/config/Xinitrc.jds. These ones seem to be related to dtterm: *XmText*background: seashell *XmTextField*background: seashell *background:#AE00B200C300 Hmm. This sounds a

Re: [osol-discuss] Getting dtterm to play nicely with GNOME 2.14...

2006-07-15 Thread Laszlo (Laca) Peter
It seems apparent that people arent percieving themselves as logging into jds. They are perceiving themselves logging into a GNOME environment. (just look at the subject line!) As such, I would suggest that the name of the session be changed. Even the file itself describes itself to

Re: [osol-discuss] Getting dtterm to play nicely with GNOME 2.14...

2006-07-15 Thread Philip Brown
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 02:50:12PM -0400, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: Even the file itself describes itself to the user as, Dthello*string: Welcome to the GNOME Desktop Environment This file has been in use (under changeable names) since GNOME 1.4, 5 years ago, so it well

Re: [osol-discuss] Getting dtterm to play nicely with GNOME 2.14...

2006-07-15 Thread Laszlo (Laca) Peter
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 12:06 -0700, Philip Brown wrote: Dthello*string: Welcome to the GNOME Desktop Environment This file has been in use (under changeable names) since GNOME 1.4, 5 years ago, so it well pre-dates JDS. yes, and i'm sure one of the old names was Xinitrc.gnome

[osol-discuss] Do all Sun build machines have ja_JP.PCK and ja_JP.UTF-8 installed ?

2006-07-15 Thread Roland Mainz
Hi! Just curious: Is it legal to assume that all Sun build machines which do OS/Net builds have the ja_JP.PCK and ja_JP.UTF-8 locales installed ? Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL

Re: [osol-discuss] Do all Sun build machines have ja_JP.PCK and ja_JP.UTF-8 installed ?

2006-07-15 Thread Danek Duvall
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 09:48:22PM +0200, Roland Mainz wrote: Is it legal to assume that all Sun build machines which do OS/Net builds have the ja_JP.PCK and ja_JP.UTF-8 locales installed ? No, why? The official ON build machines happen to have SUNWj[35]jmp installed, which contains Java man

Re: [osol-discuss] the grubby looking install process

2006-07-15 Thread Philip Brown
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 08:14:58PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Yes; the install program should make more sense out of the keyboard input; it doesn't do so now. Even with terminal properly set, it can't use Fx keys on anything other than a Sun type terminal (not xterm, usually) eh? F