Hello All,
In normal course, the Solaris Volume Manager is working fine. However, I wish
to know why the following situation arises and a way to overcome it.
I created luns and disk sets over the luns. Then I cloned the luns and
discovered those on the same host. Before I do the disk set import
Vlad wrote:
> I have DL385 after upgrade to Solaris 6/6 my server begun hang up after "init
> 6"or reboot.
This is a known problem, for which I am preparing to integrate a fix into
Solaris Nevada
(and into the next possible S10 update).
The hang is caused when, during PCI enumeration, a PCI-PCI
Stephen Lau wrote:
> I would like to propose the creation of a new project: ONNV (OS/Net
> Nevada) which would be a project under the (soon-to-be-renamed-to ON)
> community. The project's main directive will be to host a copy of the
> ON Mercurial repository which will be kept in sync with the ONN
Hi,all:
There are 3 sun solaris 8 boxes in my lab, recently I tried to open xntpd
service on them---2 as servers,one as client, but met a strange thing.
When startup the xntpd on 3 boxes, all time are syncronized. If I adjusted
the time of client 10 min forward, xntpd could sync it by about 4 p
On Monday 24 July 2006 01:46 pm, Everett F Batey II wrote:
> Anyone running Parallels Desktop (sold on Apple Website), just appeared,
> for Sol x86 10? /Everett / 805 340-6471 / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, but there are a couple folks that have this running like this and like it.
I just installed Sola
I have DL385 after upgrade to Solaris 6/6 my server begun hang up after "init
6"or reboot. Every time after reboot I could se a message at RAID controler
that some “data” is there and it needs to pushed ... Crap!!.. Power off always
clean that cache or Crap. I fixed new BIOS firmware(BIOS Config
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Stephen Lau wrote:
> I would like to propose the creation of a new project: ONNV (OS/Net Nevada)
> which would be a project under the (soon-to-be-renamed-to ON) community. The
> project's main directive will be to host a copy of the ON Mercurial repository
> which will be kep
Stephen Lau wrote:
I would like to propose the creation of a new project: ONNV (OS/Net
Nevada) which would be a project under the (soon-to-be-renamed-to ON)
community. The project's main directive will be to host a copy of the
ON Mercurial repository which will be kept in sync with the ONNV ga
I would like to propose the creation of a new project: ONNV (OS/Net
Nevada) which would be a project under the (soon-to-be-renamed-to ON)
community. The project's main directive will be to host a copy of the
ON Mercurial repository which will be kept in sync with the ONNV gate
nightly. It cou
Hi Gavin,
sorry for the long delay.
Gavin Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
>
> On 05/30/06 23:51, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> [cut]
> > kmdb: stop at cpu.AuthenticAMD.15`ao_nb_cfg
> > kmdb: target stopped at:
> > cpu.AuthenticAMD.15`ao_nb_cfg: pushl %ebp
> > [1]> ao_nb_cfg_add/X
> >
Danek Duvall wrote:
I'd like to propose that we rename the "onnv" community to be the "on"
community. The original name is more suitable for a project (a proposal
for which is to be made shortly), but we didn't have the infrastructure at
the time to do the right thing.
+1
And while you're at
Danek Duvall wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
I'd like to propose that we rename the "onnv" community to be the "on"
When I first heard about "ON", it sounded like a strange
acronym. "Where's 'OFF'?"
(So the best here is to say for me is ?0?)
If there's
Regarding current support for gcc 3.4.3 in Solaris, see below:
Rainer Orth wrote:
I think here's an important misunderstanding: this is not how free software
works. If Sun as a vendor or the OpenSolaris community as a whole rely on
GCC in some way (as Sun has done for the initial amd64 port),
Anyone running Parallels Desktop (sold on Apple Website), just appeared, for
Sol x86 10? /Everett / 805 340-6471 / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >I'd like to propose that we rename the "onnv" community to be the "on"
>
> When I first heard about "ON", it sounded like a strange
> acronym. "Where's 'OFF'?"
>
> (So the best here is to say for me is ?0?)
If there's a strong d
>
>I'd like to propose that we rename the "onnv" community to be the "on"
When I first heard about "ON", it sounded like a strange
acronym. "Where's 'OFF'?"
(So the best here is to say for me is ±0?)
Jan Engelhardt
-- ___
opensolaris-discuss mailing li
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 12:52:43PM -0700, Alexey Starovoytov wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > That is of course utter bullshit. The Linux kernel doesn't require
> > a specific gcc version.
>
> I didn't say it requires. I said shipped Linux kernel is always built with
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> That is of course utter bullshit. The Linux kernel doesn't require
> a specific gcc version.
I didn't say it requires. I said shipped Linux kernel is always built with
patched gcc. Please prove otherwise.
__
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > New releases can be provided in distro, but kernel is alwasy based
> > on some branch of some release branch. Currently they are 4.0s and 4.1s
>
> This may be for the same reasons as with Solaris: they may require specific
> changes
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:03:03PM -0700, Alexey Starovoytov wrote:
> > * Continue testing with the 4.2/mainline based gcc to make sure it at least
> > compiles ON to be able to switch when/if it is released/stable enough.
>
> As you can see Linux _never_ switched to plain gcc release.
> New rel
Alexey,
> Glad to hear that this effort was made and that some x86 features went it.
> I'm mostly concerned about sparc side.
>
> Let's see:
> -fno-jump-tables for x86 - IN
> -mno-integer-ldd-std for sparc - not in
> -fno-constant-pools for x86- not in
> -fno-dwarf2-indirect-strings
Michael,
> Rainer Orth wrote:
> > I don't see CodeSourcery being very active with GCC for Solaris
> > work these days (maybe their contract has ended?)
>
> No, their contract has not ended. (I am the initiator/manager of the contact
> for the 3.4.3 compiler).
>
> We just don't have a whole l
Alexey,
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> > * Try to get as many of those changes as possible into gcc mainline, either
> > for 4.2 or for 4.3 after 4.2 branches.
>
> It cannot go into 4.2 apparently. I believe you're familiar with gcc policies.
I'm not sure: since the 4.2 branch
Alexey,
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> > I think I asked this before when you announced GCCfss on the main gcc list:
> > how much work would it be to turn GCCfss into a generic (i.e. both sparc
> > and x86) GCC with the Sun backend? It seems that the backend interface is
> > ident
Not sure if anyone else has seen this sort of behavior or even if it happens
for anyone else at all.
I am simply looking at two machines here, both Sparc.
System 1 : hostname mars
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_38 October 2007
$ cat /etc/release
Solaris
You can get some of the patches for free. Try the following link:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/show.pl?target=patchpage. Take a look at the
recommended patch clusters.
If you want all the patches, then you may want to just purchase the basic
service plan.
This message posted from opensola
Danek Duvall wrote:
I'd like to propose that we rename the "onnv" community to be the "on"
community. The original name is more suitable for a project (a proposal
for which is to be made shortly), but we didn't have the infrastructure at
the time to do the right thing.
Thanks,
Danek
___
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Danek Duvall wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we rename the "onnv" community to be the "on"
> community. The original name is more suitable for a project (a proposal
> for which is to be made shortly), but we didn't have the infrastructure at
> the time to do the right thing
Alexey Starovoytov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I hope the completion of each can be done separately. Meaning that
> inclusion of GCCfss into sfw (or other parts of ON if sfw is not approriate
> place), can be done sort of independently from support of it in ON.
> The goal, of course, is to have
Alexey Starovoytov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> not sure why none of our email discussions went to the web.
I've no idea: I rarely use the web fora.
> Anyway, are you going to help us support gcc 4 in ON ?
> Let's say branched from 4.1
Certainly: I happen to have write-after-approval privilege
Danek Duvall wrote:
I'd like to propose that we rename the "onnv" community to be the "on"
community. The original name is more suitable for a project (a proposal
for which is to be made shortly), but we didn't have the infrastructure at
the time to do the right thing.
+1
--
-Alan Coo
I'd like to propose that we rename the "onnv" community to be the "on"
community. The original name is more suitable for a project (a proposal
for which is to be made shortly), but we didn't have the infrastructure at
the time to do the right thing.
Thanks,
Danek
_
OK : thank you very much.
Cheers,
Sergio
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re-sorry : http://www.pool.ntp.org
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Serge wrote:
- Server to connect to as client to update my date/tme ; i got an useful answer
: http://pool.ntpd.org
Yeah in the past I've just done a web search for "public ntp servers",
and filtered though the results until I found a useful doc.
--joe
___
Sorry : http://pool.ntp.org
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
- Server to connect to as client to update my date/tme ; i got an useful answer
: http://pool.ntpd.org
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Serge wrote:
Hi all,
Is there is a time server anywhere for Solaris ? I suppose yes, but never
found...
are you looking for server software? or a server to connect to as a
client to update your date/time?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
ope
Hi all,
Is there is a time server anywhere for Solaris ? I suppose yes, but never
found...
Cheers,
Sergiio
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi everybody.. im about to start a backup system on Solaris 10..
But do you guys know if this board is supported by latest edition of Solaris 10
(Solaris Express) ?
Here is the link for the board:
http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/motherboard/Opteron/nForce/H8DCE.cfm
Hope you can help..
Kind Reg
40 matches
Mail list logo
