I'm having the same issue with a DFI-Lanparty UT-SLI-DR. The only way to get
it to work is to pull the driver off of a U2 install. The nge driver will not
work from the U3 install or an snv_b53. Powering off did not work, nor
changing the BIOS settings as was recommended in another thread.
You guys are the kings. Indeed it was bug 6455727. And indeed that DTrace
one-liner illuminated the problem where no other tool could.
The resolution was simple, add the following line to lighttpd.conf:
server.network-backend = writev
The Blastwave package is built with this backend, so its
So far a lot of effort has gone into allowing members of the OpenSolaris
Community contribute code to OpenSolaris, this has been great and a lot of
progress has been made on this front.
I think it would be a great idea for non-programmers (Such as myself) to be
able to contribute to specific
So U3 is out and according to the Docs LDOM support is included.
Up to 32 logical domains per system, managed by a CLI, the Logical Domains
(LDoms) Manager 1.0 software, which is a separate download
But I still can't find where to download the Logical Domains Manager 1.0
software.
Any clues?
Bryan,
[Snip!]
And there you have it. To verify Matt's hypothesis, run the DTrace
one-liner that I sent you; if it's the bug that Matt suggested (which
certainly matches the symptoms you describe), you'll see stack traces
like this one in the output:
issig_forreal+0x5c0()
Ben Rockwood wrote:
You guys are the kings. Indeed it was bug 6455727. And indeed that DTrace
one-liner illuminated the problem where no other tool could.
The resolution was simple, add the following line to lighttpd.conf:
server.network-backend = writev
The Blastwave package is built with
You guys are the kings. Indeed it was bug 6455727. And indeed that DTrace
one-liner illuminated the problem where no other tool could.
- Ben Rockwood, on follow up to a problem of an unkillable lighttpd
process
==
Kais Belgaied mailed [1] to say that the network
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Sean Sprague wrote:
Bryan,
[Snip!]
And there you have it. To verify Matt's hypothesis, run the DTrace
one-liner that I sent you; if it's the bug that Matt suggested (which
certainly matches the symptoms you describe), you'll see stack traces
like this one in the
Sean Sprague wrote:
Bryan,
[Snip!]
And there you have it. To verify Matt's hypothesis, run the DTrace
one-liner that I sent you; if it's the bug that Matt suggested (which
certainly matches the symptoms you describe), you'll see stack traces
like this one in the output:
Ben Rockwood wrote:
You guys are the kings. Indeed it was bug 6455727. And indeed that
DTrace one-liner illuminated the problem where no other tool could.
The resolution was simple, add the following line to lighttpd.conf:
server.network-backend = writev
The Blastwave package is built
Al,
You must have missed an email. Here it is (again) [edited]:
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:45:49 -0800
From: Bryan Cantrill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ben Rockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Unkillable Processes
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Matt,
Actually, he did in the message at 10:45PM PST:
# dtrace -n profile-1234hz'/pid == 4308/[EMAIL PROTECTED]()] = count()}
Interestingly, the only difference between that and one Ben had tried is
he used stack() instead of ustack(), which is much more appropriate for
this situation.
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 09:35:31AM -0800, Rich Teer wrote:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I remember that there once was a note that SCCS will become OSS
to the end of this year. I cannot find any time frame on SCCS any more.
What is the current state?
IIRC, this was
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, Bonnie has finished all the due diligence/analysis stuff, we should
have it posted very soon.
Nice to hear.
Does very soon mean before christmas?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Slightly OT on reading benr saying that comments are not visible.
OpenSolaris being an open community, it seems strange that the comments on bugs
are still not public.
Being employed in a large organization, I know that most comments are less than
ideal for public consumption :-) , but I'd
Hi Akhilesh,
Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote:
OpenSolaris being an open community, it seems strange that the comments on bugs
are still not public.
I won't attempt to speak for Sun Microsystems policy in any way, shape
or form, however...
Please recognize there are at least three communities
Hi Matt
Yes, I agree with your take on the issue, and having been involved in such kind
of system, I am aware that customer info just cannot be shared publically, or
hell, even with other customers. What I am looking at is making the current
situation a bit better.
However, on the system I
Hi
I would like to migrate my little server (Athlon XP2000, 1Gb RAM), which is
currently running Gentoo Linux, to Solaris so that I can benefit from ZFS.
There don't appear to be any applications that I can not a) live without or b)
recompile. My only sticking point is hardware - I have a
Thanks a lot. I will investigate it.
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 19:53, Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
On 12/15/06, Albert Qu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, if ISP support pppoe and your adsl modem have ethernet interface,
it is unnecessary to run sppptul. However, if you use usb adsl modem or
your
Hi, admin
James gives a good explanation. Should I resubmit this proposal?
On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 00:26, James Carlson wrote:
UNIX admin writes:
Now solaris just supports ADSL with ethernet
interface, and we must
extend sppptun to support USB ADSL modem.
This has me confused. I
I don't play in OpenSolaris because I'm not a developer anymore, but I
sure envy the folks that do, and I am thrilled that so many of us who
'were there then' are out there playing now, too. It makes us that much
stronger.
Chris-
There's no reason not to play in OpenSolaris, even if you
A little question, how popular is the USB interface ADSL modem?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Due to licensing restrictions, we can't make the
Solaris Express ISOs available through BT.
can elaborate on this? A private tracker could provide the torrent to
registered users only, I don't see the difference between providing the ISOs
with http. (the reason I ask is really: the URLs of
In Argentina adsl usb modems are all you get from isps when you ask
for adsl for your home and i know from experience ( i was a very early
beta tester of the cxacru driver for linux) that you get usb modems in
spain and italy too
nacho
On 12/17/06, Lei Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little
Nacho,
In Argentina adsl usb modems are all you get from isps when you ask
for adsl for your home and i know from experience ( i was a very early
beta tester of the cxacru driver for linux) that you get usb modems in
spain and italy too
In Australia we generally got modems which could do
Hi!
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s_alpha_20061207 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2006-12-14/
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
i386/AMD64
If any know how to boot a Sun Fire server without the SCC?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Bernd Schemmer wrote:
But I still can't find where to download the Logical Domains Manager 1.0
software.
Any clues?
It has not been publicly released yet.
-spp
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
A configuration tool is another target of this project. For some unix
administrators, it is very easy to set pppd parameters, but for most
customers, especially newcomers of unix, they often complain that
solaris is hard to use. In this project, we will design an easy
application, which help
On 12/18/06, Albert Qu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A configuration tool is another target of this project. For some unix
administrators, it is very easy to set pppd parameters, but for most
customers, especially newcomers of unix, they often complain that
solaris is hard to use. In this project, we
Forgot to hit reply TO ALL ... :|
On 12/18/06, Eric Enright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/17/06, Christian Kujau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to licensing restrictions, we can't make the
Solaris Express ISOs available through BT.
can elaborate on this? A private tracker could provide the
Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote:
Hi
Slightly OT on reading benr saying that comments are not visible.
OpenSolaris being an open community, it seems strange that the comments on bugs
are still not public.
The problem is the comments section was not just used for commenting
on bugs, but for 10 years
32 matches
Mail list logo
