Hi,
I tried updating my system with b65 and got "Input Not Supported" right after
the language select option.
Anyone else experienced the same issue?
Thank you
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolar
On 11/06/07, Dev Mazumdar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After much deliberation - we're going with CDDL for BSD. I don't know why
OpenBSD can't work with CDDL since FreeBSD and NetBSD can.
The only complaint I've ever seen is about header files not being able
to be included by default in the ker
Dev Mazumdar wrote:
> After much deliberation - we're going with CDDL for BSD. I don't know why
> OpenBSD can't work with CDDL since FreeBSD and NetBSD can.
>
>
Good move, the more useful code released under CDDL the better.
Ian
___
opensolaris-disc
After much deliberation - we're going with CDDL for BSD. I don't know why
OpenBSD can't work with CDDL since FreeBSD and NetBSD can.
regards
Dev Mazumdar
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-dis
"The Best" desktop is not the same thing as the "As Much Java As Possible"
desktop. While an all-java desktop would be a neat novelty, that is apparently
not what JDS currently strives for.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-d
> ZFS is already ported to FreeBSD.
Yup.
OpenBSD != FreeBSD. Different projects.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Stefan,
it's nice. Could you post your configure options for Qt 4.3.0 ?? I
have been succesfully compiled Qt 4.3.0 with Sun Studio 11, 12.
Everything works fine, but designer freeze and then nothing happend.
This freeze doesn't happend if i use gcc (bundled in solaris 10 - gcc
3.4.3)
best reg
Hi Jim,
Good idea!
I'd like to add that G11n has open sourced several translated documentation
starting 1/18/07. Available docs and the languages are found in our
Documentation Download Center:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/g11n/downloads/docs/current/
G11n has received a few contributions lately,
* William James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-10 11:08]:
> Are there plans to integrate valgrind in solaris? Linux has a large
> lead in code quality because they have tools like valgrind. I think
> Solaris needs such a tool, too
Any time I've been in a discussion about valgrind, we conclude,
r
Well, the answer, historically, is to point folks to the tools community
(5+ forums) on SDN that the Sun Studio product team monitors:
http://forum.java.sun.com/category.jspa?categoryID=113
Now, there has been feedback that the SDN forum mechanism, w/o the email
gateway, is less than adequa
QT/Jambi [http://trolltech.com/products/qt/jambi] on Solaris 10 built
with Sun Studio 11 and QT 4.3.0:
http://www.stefanteleman.org/qtjambi/jambisolaris.jpg
And some patches:
http://www.stefanteleman.org/qtjambi/
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquis
FYI...here is where one can find more info on dbx-runtime checking:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5257/6n7bql85l?a=view
Discussions around Sun Studio tooling (e.g. runtime checking, etc.)
happen in this forum:
http://forum.java.sun.com/forum.jspa?forumID=852
Improved gcc front-e
[I've cc'ed desktop-discuss, where conversations about desktop tools
will actually be seen by the people working on them, unlike
opensolaris-discuss]
Karsten Hashimoto wrote:
JDS was meant to be a Java Desktop System wasn't it ?
Not really - that was just a name chosen when "Java" was added
Hi,
I am currently wondering about where the new Solaris Desktop system JDS is
going to.
I cannot see more Java tools in there than with all other Destop Systems I had
used in the past.
So I would suggest to make a list of candidate tools that could be improved and
integrated in JDS.
There are
JDS was meant to be a Java Desktop System wasn't it ?
So, I would suggest to go with www.jpedal.org and build a nice Java PDF Viewer
that finally runs on each and every system. I'm using it on various Solaris
boxes and it works already sufficiently well.
To test it unpack the archive to /opt/jp
Gary Gendel wrote:
I work for an extremely Linux-centric company. Believe it or not, when I
mentioned that Sun's Compiler is available on Linux to the CTO, he was
ecstatic. However, how do you convince the third-party vendors to supply their
libraries for this? In the past the C++ name manglin
William James wrote:
On 5/18/07, Holger Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/15/07, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruno Jargot wrote:
> > Does Opensolaris have mailing list for the Studio compiler (mailing
> > list, not the dreaded web forum Sun uses for support)?
>
> You might
Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gary Gendel wrote:
> > Casper,
> >
> > As always, I learned something important from your replies. It seems that a
> > number of others didn't know about the dbx run time checker either.
> >
> > I work for an extremely Linux-centric company. Believe it or
Roland Mainz wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
William James wrote:
No one from Sun's compiler team did bother to respond to my emails.
They may not care about good customer support but I do. I think the
best way is now to move forward and create a mailing list at
opensolaris.org
The most logical
On 11/06/07, Gary Gendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Casper,
As always, I learned something important from your replies. It seems that a
number of others didn't know about the dbx run time checker either.
I work for an extremely Linux-centric company. Believe it or not, when I
mentioned that S
Gary Gendel wrote:
> Casper,
>
> As always, I learned something important from your replies. It seems that a
> number of others didn't know about the dbx run time checker either.
>
> I work for an extremely Linux-centric company. Believe it or not, when I
> mentioned that Sun's Compiler is availa
>Casper,
>
>As always, I learned something important from your replies. It seems that a
>number of others didn'
t know about the dbx run time checker either.
>
>I work for an extremely Linux-centric company. Believe it or not, when I
>mentioned that Sun's Comp
iler is available on Linux to the C
> valgrind 3 now works on PPC and AMD64 and the
> valgrind people say
> there is no problem with porting it to Solaris
So, why haven't "the valgrind people" ported it to Solaris yet, when "there's
no problem"?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
> I think IBM, HP, Dell, Fedora, Red hat, Ubuntu and
> Linus will all disagree >:-)
> Seriously: Solaris needs better tools for run time
> code checking
Honestly, I read this stuff and I wonder:
is there a better checker than one's brain?
I mean, either one knows what one is doing, or one doesn'
Casper,
As always, I learned something important from your replies. It seems that a
number of others didn't know about the dbx run time checker either.
I work for an extremely Linux-centric company. Believe it or not, when I
mentioned that Sun's Compiler is available on Linux to the CTO, he was
Casper,
As always, I learned something important from your replies. It seems that a
number of others didn't know about the dbx run time checker either.
I work for an extremely Linux-centric company. Believe it or not, when I
mentioned that Sun's Compiler is available on Linux to the CTO, he was
Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William James wrote:
> > On 6/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I have not seen a code quality lead for Linux, certainly not a large
> >> one.
> >>
> >> One tool which wans't mentioned was dbx' runtime checker, "rtc"
> >> which does
Artem Kachitchkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It was probably not a good idea to mix a perfectly fine proposal with a
> flamebatish personal opinion. Two very different topics. Regarding the
> former, I see no reason not to include valgrind in the Solaris
> multiverse, once the new packagin
Roland Mainz wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
>> William James wrote:
>>
>>> No one from Sun's compiler team did bother to respond to my emails.
>>> They may not care about good customer support but I do. I think the
>>> best way is now to move forward and create a mailing list at
>>> ope
Good idea
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Dev Mazumdar wrote:
> The rumors are true, we're planning on open sourcing Open Sound (on June
> 14th). We will be offering the source code under CDDL to Solaris and GPLv2
> for Linux BSD, OpenServer etc.
>
> At this time, we'd like to propose that Open Sound be started as a project
> under the
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> William James wrote:
> > No one from Sun's compiler team did bother to respond to my emails.
> > They may not care about good customer support but I do. I think the
> > best way is now to move forward and create a mailing list at
> > opensolaris.org
>
> The most logical p
Hi, guys.
Since later this week we'll be two, I thought I'd start a little roll up
of where we are right now as a community. Some people have been asking
me lately about metrics and such, so I thought now would be a good time
to look back and collect some of the key items in one place. We keep
m
33 matches
Mail list logo
