> On 6/14/07, Gaopeng Chen - Sun China
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Fingerprint Authentication
> > ==
> >
> >
> > Project Overview:
> > -
> > The biometrics technology grows fast. Fingerprint
> authentication is
> > widely used in many situations. It'
Now it just focuses on the fingerprint. The design is required to be
able to easily extended to other biometrics. If the resources in
opensolaris are enough, the bioAPI may be considered to be imported to
cover all the biometrics. Thanks.
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 10:48, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
> Is
Is this project limited to just fingerprints? If so, would it make sense
to still make the new subsystem easily extensible to future types of
biometrics?
-Artem.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 6/14/07, Gaopeng Chen - Sun China <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fingerprint Authentication
==
Project Overview:
-
The biometrics technology grows fast. Fingerprint authentication is
widely used in many situations. It's a valuable featu
+1
Keep in mind that you may want your architecture to support BIOS with
fingerprint hardware crypto support. For example the "p" series from Lenovo
(T61p, etc.)
Gary
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
op
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > or even better simply to make, tar, format, ...
> > Afterall they are only an implementation of these well specified and long
> > existing programs. Credits to Jörg that they may be the best implementation
> > on earth, but I really see no advantage
Just a friendly reminder to everyone. We're having the first annual
OpenSolaris Community Picnic tomorrow at Baylands Park in Sunnyvale!
Get details on the event at http://cuddletech.com/tamr/ in Tamarah's
blog. If you want to register for the event (most people aren't) visit
http://upcoming
Hay, Mausul W wrote:
> "Time to educate your leader."
>
> Ian,
>
> Please don't get into the arrogant belief that just because it is
> Solaris or any other UNIX variant that anti-virus is unnecessary. Virus
> writers haven't targeted 'NIX but that doesn't mean 'NIX is
> invulnerable. My guess is th
On 15/06/07, Thomas Maier-Komor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > smake, star, sformat, sfind (a bit newer),
>
> I think it is better to rename such tools to
> schillymake, schillytar,
> schillyformat or put them into usr/schilly/bin.
>
or even better simply to
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > smake, star, sformat, sfind (a bit newer),
>
> I think it is better to rename such tools to
> schillymake, schillytar,
> schillyformat or put them into usr/schilly/bin.
>
or even better simply to make, tar, format, ...
Afterall they are only an implement
http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS8470376604.html
--
"Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hi!
i have a MB with internal lan Intel Chipset 945G ( i think Realtek RTL8111b
10/100/1000M ) i try to install Solaris 10 and Solaris Express Build 65 but the
OS dosn't find me the lan adapter, what i have to do for install this type of
lan? is a problem if i use a switch 10/100 ? thanks
Abhishek Pratap wrote:
Can any one tell me how to get off this list.
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-discuss
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
___
Can any one tell me how to get off this list.
Abhi
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
"Babu" == Babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Babu> Please excuse me if this is not the right forum to ask. I have a
Babu> question on decoding dynamic sections on target on PPC. I need
Babu> to know how to read or find equivalent of the following MIPS
Babu> DT_XX entris in PPC.
Might be better to
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 06:32 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
> 1. SPARC (and nowdays AMD and intel) processors support a so-called "no
> execution stack" bit, and this bit is set to 1 by default;
> what that means is, you can't execute any malicious code that you put on the
> stack, the hardware won't al
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, iceberg wrote:
Solaris 10, sun studio 11, sometimes I attach my process with dbx and the "where" command
can only display a few stack with a notification "can't derive frame point".
My program has been compiled and linked with -g option.
But optimized at high levels ?
Wi
On 6/12/07, Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I tried updating my system with b65 and got "Input Not Supported" right
after the language select option.
Anyone else experienced the same issue?
Basically any info and testing you can provide narrow down the conditions
that trigger this er
One thing I have been wondering is, couldn't this be implemented as a shell
builtin? Most, if not all shells keep a hash of all executables, libraries
and manpages in memory. Might we be able to leverage this for a lightweight
version of of what Anne is looking for? (I am not sure if useful, but i
> Interesting! All these years of using them and I
> never knew that. Wonder why
> SUN hasn't bothered to include it (as Red Hat did) in
> their installs?
Because if you've done everything "by the book", you'll never need it.
`locate` is nothing but a kludge.
This message posted from opensola
Thanks for the explanation. I am not completely familiar with the
background but this sheds some light on the issue that I was unaware of
before.
Mausul.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of UNIX
admin
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 9:33 AM
To: op
Holger Berger wrote:
Ted, when will this project go public?
Holger
It just did this week, no?
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/samqfs/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anne wrote:
> > Does anyone know if Solaris 10 has the ability to index all of it's
> > contents and those contents are available for query? (Akin to Red Hat's
> > "locate" and "updatedb" features.) The "find" command is so sllow
>
> Those aren't
> not me ,but my leader think so~whatever i like or
> not,it's my work must to do that.
> today on the meeting ,my leader ask me to create a
> new zone ,then install a antivirus on it.i don't know
> why,but i should try it next week :(
Solaris does not need an antivirus solution. UNIX security mod
> Have you considered using Flash Archives? See
> flar(1M). It sounds
> like this is similar to what you're trying to do.
The really clean thing to do would be to build a package, install it, then make
a Flash(TM) archive.
And of course keep the pkgprotos under revision control...
This mes
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Paul Durrant wrote:
On 15/06/07, Paul Gamper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry i looked over 2 hours and i can't find.
The reason you can't find it is because it's not there ;-) There's no
such thing as debug 'mode'. If you want a DEBUG kernel then you have
to install one
> My guess is that as Linux gains more
> acceptance in the
> wider computing arena, in corporate circles and in
> consumer PCs, hackers
> will begin to see more opportunities at hacking 'NIX
> for profit or
> getting at sensitive personal data and the incidents
> of viruses aimed at
> 'NIX systems
> Please don't get into the arrogant belief that just
> because it is
> Solaris or any other UNIX variant that anti-virus is
> unnecessary. Virus
> writers haven't targeted 'NIX but that doesn't mean
> 'NIX is
> invulnerable.
It would appear that you're unfamiliar with the technical background of
On 4/24/07, Ted Pogue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These data
services ex
Frank,
We are mostly in violent agreement. It is difficult to write programs to
scan for a virus that does not yet exist, but that is why Heuristics are
used to detect "virus-like behavior". Someone else responded that there
are NO viruses for Solaris and I disagree with that statement. While
ther
On 15/06/07, Paul Gamper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry i looked over 2 hours and i can't find.
The reason you can't find it is because it's not there ;-) There's no
such thing as debug 'mode'. If you want a DEBUG kernel then you have
to install one (find out about bfu from the website) or i
On 6/11/07, Kuldip Oberoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, the answer, historically, is to point folks to the tools community
(5+ forums) on SDN that the Sun Studio product team monitors:
http://forum.java.sun.com/category.jspa?categoryID=113
Now, there has been feedback that the SDN forum
Why do you want fingerprint authentication? You can fool these sensors
easily with a piece of wax or latex. You'd better write the root
password on the backside of the keyboard - that's more secure than
fingerprint authentication
Exactly why I want to see bioapi in instead of some fingerprint pa
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Hay, Mausul W wrote:
"Time to educate your leader."
Ian,
Please don't get into the arrogant belief that just because it is
Solaris or any other UNIX variant that anti-virus is unnecessary. Virus
writers haven't targeted 'NIX but that doesn't mean 'NIX is
invulnerable. My g
"Time to educate your leader."
Ian,
Please don't get into the arrogant belief that just because it is
Solaris or any other UNIX variant that anti-virus is unnecessary. Virus
writers haven't targeted 'NIX but that doesn't mean 'NIX is
invulnerable. My guess is that as Linux gains more acceptance i
yoyo wrote:
>>> Except ClamAV,anyone else?
>>>
>> Wait a minute. Do you need antivirus solution on your
>> Solaris system for your *Windows* systems,
>>
>> or do you actually want an antivirus solution on
>> Solaris because you believe that Solaris also needs
>> an antivirus program?
>>
On 6/14/07, Gaopeng Chen - Sun China <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fingerprint Authentication
==
Project Overview:
-
The biometrics technology grows fast. Fingerprint authentication is
widely used in many situations. It's a valuable feature to support
finge
> > > What if I wanted to use pam_bioapi instead of pam_fpr before bioapi is
imported?
> >
> > I have to say "no" before bioapi is imported. But it doesn't matter
> > since the security services (such as login, xscreensaver, etc) work upon
> > the PAM APIs. pam_fpr or pam_bioapi is just a pluggab
+1
Gaopeng Chen - Sun China wrote:
> Fingerprint Authentication
> ==
>
>
> Project Overview:
> -
> The biometrics technology grows fast. Fingerprint authentication is
> widely used in many situations. It's a valuable feature to support
> fingerprint in Solar
Sorry i looked over 2 hours and i can't find.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > Except ClamAV,anyone else?
>
> Wait a minute. Do you need antivirus solution on your
> Solaris system for your *Windows* systems,
>
> or do you actually want an antivirus solution on
> Solaris because you believe that Solaris also needs
> an antivirus program?
not me ,but my leader think so~
> Except ClamAV,anyone else?
Wait a minute. Do you need antivirus solution on your Solaris system for your
*Windows* systems,
or do you actually want an antivirus solution on Solaris because you believe
that Solaris also needs an antivirus program?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
42 matches
Mail list logo
