MC wrote:
> Not that I care for bureaucracy, and not that I know what is happening here,
> but...
>
> I think if you strong-arm past the OpenSolaris community bureaucracy (and
> again, not saying you are, because I don't know much about it), it'll be
> archived forever and referenced in the fut
Not that I care for bureaucracy, and not that I know what is happening here,
but...
I think if you strong-arm past the OpenSolaris community bureaucracy (and
again, not saying you are, because I don't know much about it), it'll be
archived forever and referenced in the future to show how Sun o
[Followups to trademark-policy-dev, please.
To post you will need to subscribe by first sending an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-John ]
Ian Murdock wrote:
> ... The first step to a branding program is to define
> the OpenSolaris binary core, and I invite the community to help define
> it, using th
Good idea! Unfortunately it also does not work, and I suspect the root of the
problem
is a bug in /usr/sbin/pkgrm command. Here is the output:
# printf "y\ny\n"
y
y
# printf "y\ny\n" | pkgrm SPROprfnx
The following package is currently installed:
SPROprfnx Sun Studio 12 Non-ship 64-bit com
Quoting Nikolay Molchanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I tried another way to pass 2 "y" replies:
>
> rm -f /tmp/yes.txt
> touch /tmp/yes.txt
> echo "y" >> /tmp/yes.txt
> echo "y" >> /tmp/yes.txt
> cat /tmp/yes.txt | pkgrm SPROprfnx
Also you can try -
printf "y\ny\n" | pkgrm SPROprfnx
Doug
_
I tried another way to pass 2 "y" replies:
rm -f /tmp/yes.txt
touch /tmp/yes.txt
echo "y" >> /tmp/yes.txt
echo "y" >> /tmp/yes.txt
cat /tmp/yes.txt | pkgrm SPROprfnx
And it also does not work. It reads fisrt "y", but ignores the second "y".
At the same time /usr/sbin/pkgadd works just fine. It al
When Project Indiana was first conceived, it was envisioned to be a
community distribution of OpenSolaris--in other words, built by the
community and called OpenSolaris [1]. My basic observation, as someone
who came into the OpenSolaris community from the outside - even perhaps
from the competition
Depending on which GUI you use it all over the board:
i.e: xterm
/usr/openwin/lib/X11/app-defaults
/usr/openwin/lib/app-defaults
old CDE for dtterm
/usr/dt/app-defaults
X11 programs i.e: XOrgCfg XvidtuneSUNWgnome-session
/usr/X11/lib/X11/app-defaults
Login manager for gdm
/etc/X11
gnome keys
On 10/30/07, Nikolay Molchanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you very much, guys, for giving this example:
>
> % yes | pkgrm ...
>
> It really works! But it is absolutely not understandable why a standard Unix
> solution
> does not work:
>
> % echo "y" | echo "y" | pkgrm ...
>
> What is inter
Using the admin script is great for pkgadd / pkgrm for jumpstart & kickstart
and automated updates via scripts, A lot of venders have not kept up with this
, here is man entry note form zoneadm:
"The act of installing a new non-global zone is a fresh ins-
tallation of the Solaris op
Thank you very much, guys, for giving this example:
% yes | pkgrm ...
It really works! But it is absolutely not understandable why a standard Unix
solution
does not work:
% echo "y" | echo "y" | pkgrm ...
What is interesting, the first "y" works, but the second "y" does not. Why? Is
it a bug?
Hi, I'm a total newbie and I have aquestion. I read a lot of PDF documents and
I would like to change the default black text on white background to other
colors, ie. black on grey...
Here's what my .Xdefault have
acroread*Background: black
acroread*Foreground: white
This only changes the colo
James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling writes:
> > James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Right ... plus, if it were important enough to contend with, I'd think
> > > we could create (yet another) new stat interface to deal with the
> > > problem.
> >
> > I would be re
You may find what you want in the output of
pfiles /proc/*
although since the PID and the IP won't be on the same line, it may not be
pretty.
Also, think "process(es)", not just "process", since a socket or TLI/XTI STREAM,
like any other fd, can be inherited.
This message posted from openso
I routinely remove sendmail and replace it with qmail on my mail servers.
Recently, I've been toying with the idea of replacing sendmail with an "as
needed" mail subsystem on my OpenSolaris laptops. You need something or things
like "cron" can't send mail. But to have a running service all th
Joerg Schilling writes:
> James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Right ... plus, if it were important enough to contend with, I'd think
> > we could create (yet another) new stat interface to deal with the
> > problem.
>
> I would be really happy with this!
>
> I would propose to make it ef
James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You won't see them by default, thanks to PSARC 2005/361 (bug 6248624) -
> > PCFS
> > clamps the timestamps to the UN*X 32bit time_t range unless explicitly told
> > not
> > to by a mount option (noclamptime). See pcfs(7fs) and mount_pcfs(1m) about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Note that 32-bit applications have no problem handling large files on
> >> Solaris, so it's really more of an issue in run-time memory space than
> >> anything else.
> >
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that 32-bit applications have no problem handling large files on
Solaris, so it's really more of an issue in run-time memory space than
anything else.
32bit Applications cannot access files with file st
?? TaoJie wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> My platform is:
> Intel Pentium 4 CPU
> OpenSolaris B74, built by myself
> Sun Studio 11
>
> In my program, I use asm("rdtsc") to measure the time cost between two rdtsc.
> for example:
> int some_func(...)
> {
> long long time1, time2;
> int i = 3198, j =
James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that 32-bit applications have no problem handling large files on
> Solaris, so it's really more of an issue in run-time memory space than
> anything else.
32bit Applications cannot access files with file stamps that do not fit into
the
32 bit rang
Il Tuesday 30 October 2007 16:04:24 Dennis Clarke ha scritto:
> It is real tough to argue with the stability of SendMail though
> isn't it ?
of course, but...
> Once you get the config done and you compile the .cf
> file
this is the point: I can't accept to waste hours just to compile
macro
On 10/30/07, Isaac R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandorr wrote:
>
> >At the heart of it is the questions, "Should the OpenSolaris
> >brand/trademark refer to a runnable OS?", and "If, so, do we limit to
> >distros that are binary copies of the Indiana distro?"
> >
>
> I think we need to define a
Brandorr wrote:
>At the heart of it is the questions, "Should the OpenSolaris
>brand/trademark refer to a runnable OS?", and "If, so, do we limit to
>distros that are binary copies of the Indiana distro?"
>
>
>
I think we need to define a difference between what constitutes an
'operating syste
> On 10/30/07, Nico Sabbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> after many years of tears I could never get accustomed to the pain
>> of sendmail, thus I'd like to eradicate it from all my solaris boxes
>> (as I did in all my linux boxes) in order to replace it with postfix.
>> Is it risky? Is ther
Ché Kristo wrote:
>> *) i am wondering what would be the better road to
>> take, should I download an run Opensolaris Indiana or
>> SXCE75/76/77, or will they be available at all when
>> indiana is released? How does indiana compare to SXCE
>
> SXCE at least will be discontinued, SXDE will likely
stefan writes:
> *) one feature i Really Need for my laptop is PPTP vpn. I need to connect to
> a VPN server at work but when i ran SXCE72 i was not able to get it working,
> is it possible at all to connect to a pptp vpn server from solaris?
No; there's no support (yet) for Microsoft's propriet
On 10/30/07, Nico Sabbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> after many years of tears I could never get accustomed to the pain
> of sendmail, thus I'd like to eradicate it from all my solaris boxes
> (as I did in all my linux boxes) in order to replace it with postfix.
> Is it risky? Is there any re
Hi,
after many years of tears I could never get accustomed to the pain
of sendmail, thus I'd like to eradicate it from all my solaris boxes
(as I did in all my linux boxes) in order to replace it with postfix.
Is it risky? Is there any reason why I shouldn't do it?
Is there anything unexpected tha
29 matches
Mail list logo
