Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlockedonSolarisx86machine

Hi Thanks a lot for your helpI could find the bug in my programI corrected one of the data types and everything worked fine I have a kernel module which uses this user program...I am getting a panic with the following stack trace. Jan 3 10:42:16 upsuite1 genunix: [ID 938853 kern.noti

Re: [osol-discuss] Any interest in a Wine Community for OpenSolaris?

> I currently maintain the QEMU port for the > OpenSolaris project, and have also > been dabbling in Wine for 6 or 7 months. I monitor > the Wine-devel list and > test the builds after a release or two. I've been > talking to a few other folks off > line about wine, and know that there are severa

Re: [osol-discuss] Any interest in a Wine Community for OpenSolaris?

+1 to an OpenSolaris project. On Jan 2, 2008 11:37 AM, Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I currently maintain the QEMU port for the OpenSolaris project, and have > also > been dabbling in Wine for 6 or 7 months. I monitor the Wine-devel list > and > test the builds after a release or two.

Re: [osol-discuss] Any interest in a Wine Community for OpenSolaris?

On Jan 2, 2008 12:37 PM, Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I currently maintain the QEMU port for the OpenSolaris project, and have also > been dabbling in Wine for 6 or 7 months. I monitor the Wine-devel list and > test the builds after a release or two. I've been talking to a few other >

Re: [osol-discuss] Pb starting zones after hw upgrade

It didn't make sense to me either, but I created a couple of entries in my menu.lst file: one would boot in 64 bit mode and the other one would boot in 32 bit mode. Nothing else is different. If I boot in 64 bit mode and try to start the zone, it goes into an endless init loop, whereas if I boot

Re: [osol-discuss] Pb starting zones after hw upgrade

Bertrand Sirodot writes: > I have found the solution to the zone issue: the zones were created when > running a 32 bits OS and my new motherboard and CPU run 64 bits, so when I > booted the OS, it automatically select the 64 bits version of the kernel. As > soon as I rebooted to 32 bits, the zon

Re: [osol-discuss] Pb starting zones after hw upgrade

I have found the solution to the zone issue: the zones were created when running a 32 bits OS and my new motherboard and CPU run 64 bits, so when I booted the OS, it automatically select the 64 bits version of the kernel. As soon as I rebooted to 32 bits, the zones came up. Thanks a lot, Bertr

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

> Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > John Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > If something else can get the job done well, > I'm > > > not averse to using it. But it appears at moment > I > > > have no way to access or otherwise using punchin. > > > Furthermore, does it work

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If something else can get the job done well, I'm > > not averse to using it. But it appears at moment I > > have no way to access or otherwise using punchin. > > Furthermore, does it work with the existing C

Re: [osol-discuss] NSA has backdoors into Windows?

Tim Scanlon wrote: > dclarke wrote: > "minor nit. Solaris is not open source." > > Solaris still gets code reviews by government agencies to preclude this sort > of OS back door though, Not all of it - I don't know of anyone in the world, inside or outside of Sun, who has access to every line of

[osol-discuss] Any interest in a Wine Community for OpenSolaris?

I currently maintain the QEMU port for the OpenSolaris project, and have also been dabbling in Wine for 6 or 7 months. I monitor the Wine-devel list and test the builds after a release or two. I've been talking to a few other folks off line about wine, and know that there are several other folks

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

> John Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If something else can get the job done well, I'm > not averse to using it. But it appears at moment I > have no way to access or otherwise using punchin. > Furthermore, does it work with the existing Cisco > based VPN server deployments that are alread

Re: [osol-discuss] NSA has backdoors into Windows?

>> dclarke wrote: >> "minor nit. Solaris is not open source." >> >> Solaris still gets code reviews by government >> agencies to preclude this sort of OS back door >> though, as does every other major OS in use by the US >> & international governments to preclude this sort of >> activity from happ

Re: [osol-discuss] NSA has backdoors into Windows?

> dclarke wrote: > "minor nit. Solaris is not open source." > > Solaris still gets code reviews by government > agencies to preclude this sort of OS back door > though, as does every other major OS in use by the US > & international governments to preclude this sort of > activity from happening. >

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

John Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So how was/is the "hidden" support utilized on older Solaris releases? > > I'll keep the thread updated if I get any further responses from Cisco. Big customers seem to be able to get Cisco VPN support for Solaris 9 x86. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

Hello Jörg- I did get this reply: >Hello John, > >My name is Vikas and as per the case notes I have closed the service request >#607449389. > >Rupam has already forwarded your request to the concerned department. >We hope to provide you support on Solaris VPN Client in future. > >In case you t

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

John Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still decided to open a case with Cisco and request an x86 version of the > VPN client. I referenced this thread in the ticket, so they will see any > related comments. We'll see how far this goes. Thanks for your input > everybody. > Please let us kno

Re: [osol-discuss] rpcbind fails to start

Thanks a lot Casper. That did it. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

I still decided to open a case with Cisco and request an x86 version of the VPN client. I referenced this thread in the ticket, so they will see any related comments. We'll see how far this goes. Thanks for your input everybody. Happy New Year, all. -John This message posted from opensolari

Re: [osol-discuss] How to create ISO image of a cd/dvd on Solaris

John Brewer writes: > These commends used to work, under both Solaris and snv_bXX. This is a good > iso image, this was used in a luupgrade from 10u4 w. patches to snv_b78, I > tried to create a iso install dvd from the iso image! This is a known Nevada build 78 bug. It was fixed in build 79 --

Re: [osol-discuss] [Fwd: SXDE: Installation Fails: Cannot Create Duplicate fdisk Partitions (c1d0)]

Hi Jags, It's CR6643566 [Can't install SXDE due to fdisk error in snv_79/snv_80 for Vista partition. ] There is a workaround that users have to manually run fdisk to create Solaris_2 partition. I think the main reason here is fdisk CLI that installer

Re: [osol-discuss] Possibly coming from Linux and I have some questions

On Sat, 2007-12-22 at 14:51 +0100, Mario Goebbels wrote: > > Its pretty trivial to get ntfs-3g to compile which gives you read/write > > support for ntfs. > > Since when's that? Pretty recently. > Last time I've tried it, it failed due to > unimplemented mount flags or whatever it was. When I'

Re: [osol-discuss] rpcbind fails to start

>even the permissions on the real devices look ok: >crw--- 1 root sys 42, 2 Dec 31 19:07 /devices/pseudo/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:tcp >crw--- 1 root sys 105, 2 Dec 31 19:07 /devices/pseudo/[EMAIL >PROTECTED]:ticlts >crw--- 1 root sys 105, 0 Dec 31 19:08 /devices/pseudo/[EMAIL >PROTECTED]:ti