> Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > John Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > If something else can get the job done well, > I'm > > > not averse to using it. But it appears at moment > I > > > have no way to access or otherwise using punchin. > > > Furthermore, does it work with the existing Cisco > > > based VPN server deployments that are already in > use > > > in many of Sun's customers' shops? > > > > > > Just to give some additional information: > > > > > > For Solaris 9 there is Cisco VPN-5000 > > > > > > This does not work anymore for Solaris 10 or > newer. > > > > I'm surprised at this. I was one of the last > holdouts for the VPN-5000 > > at Sun, and I was regularly using Solaris 10 for > VPN access. > > > > As Sun migrated to the VPN-3000, we lost support > for Solaris/x86, > > however, I believe that the following information > may be > > good for folks with VPN-3000 access. I built it > once, but > > OK, it seems that I was wrong with asuming that > VPN-5000 might still be > be useful somewhere.
No. Don't take it that way. I was just saying that I was using VPN-5000 on Solaris 10/x86, before Sun offlined the VPN-5000 concentrators. Then it was either VPN-3000 or punchin. > Does this mean that you would need VPN-3000 today? I use VPN-3000 on Windows, and punchin for Solaris (though with more services available through the firewall, I find I don't need it that much anymore). Windows I use extensively when I'm out and about because of the wireless broadband card. Ben This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
