[osol-discuss] Solaris for desktop

2008-01-18 Thread Putinei Ionut
Hi, Since i could'n unsubscribe form this forum, i'm asking you if solaris can be used as a desktop.Is there a repository containing 3rd party packets(like mp3 decoder).this is the minimum i require to pass to solaris. Solaris Express is a legitimate platform for installing Oracle database s

Re: [osol-discuss] [kde-discuss] KDE4 OpenSolaris Presentation and BoF : Wednesday January 16th 4:00PM (fwd)

2008-01-18 Thread Manish Chakravarty
Hi Adriaan, That is a really sexy show! It is also a little dated by now, as many > things have changed since r.773; in particular the amount of dependencies > that are packaged has grown considerably, we package 32- and 64-bit builds > together, the build system has been simplified a bit. There i

Re: [osol-discuss] A question about usr/bin/i286 in SUNWcsu

2008-01-18 Thread D.
If any of this ancient stuff would be useful with my old Interactive/386 and Microport/286 stuff, then, no, it shouldn't be removed. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] A question about usr/bin/i286 in SUNWcsu

2008-01-18 Thread Dennis Clarke
warning : long boring message I was curious to see a manpage for machid(1) which has not been updated since 5 Jul 1990. A good solid 17.5 years more or less. The manpage makes reference to IBM System/370 and VAX-11/750 and PDP-11/45. Systems that I have not seen in twenty years or so. I fell upo

Re: [osol-discuss] ¨Could not look up internet address for unknown¨

2008-01-18 Thread James Carlson
W. Wayne Liauh writes: > However, as you and James discussed in a separate reply, the DHCP client > config needs to be better (an understatement) implemented (& _documented_) in > Solaris, especially now that almost everyone has a dumb DHCP server > (broadband router) at home. The situation bec

Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?

2008-01-18 Thread Douglas R. McCallum
> > One other problem is that after I rebooted the > OpenSolaris CIFS server, > the shares were inaccessible. Meaning I couldn't > connect to them with > either an OS X or XP client. After resetting the ZFS > sharesmb > properties, it worked again. I will do a reboot test > to confirm this is

Re: [osol-discuss] ¨Could not look up internet address for unknown¨

2008-01-18 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
> Does the vender id and device id that > /usr/X11/bin/scancpi and prtconf -pv output show for > the e1000g show in your /etc/driver_aliases this is > managed by the add_drv command: > > add_drv -i "pcivendor-id,device-id" e100g ( check the > man page for the syntax with single quotes around the >

Re: [osol-discuss] svn (probably) buggy in b78!

2008-01-18 Thread Mike . Sullivan
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 17 19:49:25 2008 >> >> 6633860 svn broken on snv_78, suspect apache change >> >> Fixed in 79. >> > >Do these bug fixes also contribute testsuite updates. This one did not, no. Assuming you mean to the svn testsuite (assuming there is one in there, I haven't

Re: [osol-discuss] PC rtc 0.5 seconds fast

2008-01-18 Thread Dennis Clarke
> > > Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> I took note of this based on NTP data after a reboot : >> >> Note the delta_t > 0.5 sec issue here after a reboot >> http://www.blastwave.org/articles/BLS-0063/callisto_peerstats_delay.png > > Just a second Dennis. You say that the delta is greater than .5 sec, > bu

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris vs MySQL Cluster

2008-01-18 Thread Akhilesh Mritunjai
Hi Couple of thoughts to proceed: 1. Boot with kmdb attached on system console (serial/local). When this happens, F1-A into the debugger and do some looking around. When you're at it, also take a crash dump/stacktrace for others to take a peek. Here's the guide: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/d

Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?

2008-01-18 Thread Haik Aftandilian
I'm using it on my personal LAN at home. I've connected to a share with from both OS X Tiger and Windows XP. I followed the steps at http://opensolaris.org/os/project/cifs-server/gettingstarted.html I still need to investigate these, but so far I've hit two problems. I've seen the smb/server

Re: [osol-discuss] ¨Could not look up internet address for unknown¨

2008-01-18 Thread John Brewer
Does the vender id and device id that /usr/X11/bin/scancpi and prtconf -pv output show for the e1000g show in your /etc/driver_aliases this is managed by the add_drv command: add_drv -i "pcivendor-id,device-id" e100g ( check the man page for the syntax with single quotes around the double quote

Re: [osol-discuss] PC rtc 0.5 seconds fast

2008-01-18 Thread Brian Utterback
Dennis Clarke wrote: > I took note of this based on NTP data after a reboot : > > Note the delta_t > 0.5 sec issue here after a reboot > http://www.blastwave.org/articles/BLS-0063/callisto_peerstats_delay.png Just a second Dennis. You say that the delta is greater than .5 sec, but based on the

Re: [osol-discuss] Building QT-4.3.3 with OpenGL enabled

2008-01-18 Thread russell aspinwall
How do you specify the -I include for the Mesa directory so that the build can take place, as it automatically appends GL/ . eg GL/gl.h GL/glu.h Attempting to build with the NVIDIA include indicates the file is not present it looks for GL/glu.h which is not provided. If NVIDIA provides its incl

Re: [osol-discuss] ¨Could not look up internet address for unknown¨

2008-01-18 Thread James Carlson
John Brewer writes: > Dhcp client did work on and off there were several code changes and putbacks, > it had worked with Time Warners Cable modem, and DSL modem in between these > versions of snv_b55 to snv_b61 and one of the 10u4 beta's with a few other > caviate's > > http://www.opensolaris.o

Re: [osol-discuss] PC rtc 0.5 seconds fast

2008-01-18 Thread Dennis Clarke
> The IBM PC-AT rtc returns the next second only 0.5 seconds after setting it. > I assume that this was to keep the error to +/- 0.5 seconds. However, the > result is that the system clock will be 0.5 seconds faster after a reboot. > > At various periods there has been a work-around for this in Li

Re: [osol-discuss] Failing to install pkg on a zone

2008-01-18 Thread Derek E. Lewis
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, UNIX admin wrote: > Zones need a full fledged Oracle or PostgreSQL RDBMs behind them, > integrated into a software deployment server. There is currently no such > product on the market that actually does it well. I like the idea of this; however, it does introduce a point o

[osol-discuss] PC rtc 0.5 seconds fast

2008-01-18 Thread Andrew Robb
The IBM PC-AT rtc returns the next second only 0.5 seconds after setting it. I assume that this was to keep the error to +/- 0.5 seconds. However, the result is that the system clock will be 0.5 seconds faster after a reboot. At various periods there has been a work-around for this in Linux. Thi

Re: [osol-discuss] Panic with"trap data type: 0x31 (data access MMU miss)" in a kernel module

2008-01-18 Thread Vamsee Priya
Thanks a lot .. Will try to look as to what could be the problem. Thanks Priya -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 3:51 PM To: Vamsee Priya Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Panic with"trap

Re: [osol-discuss] Panic with "trap data type: 0x31 (data access MMU miss)" in a kernel module

2008-01-18 Thread Frank . Hofmann
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Vamsee Priya wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have a kernel module which panics at 2 different places with the > following pani message : > > trap data type: 0x31 (data access MMU miss) > > When does this kind of a trap occur actually? Under the same circumstances when you get SIGSE

[osol-discuss] Panic with "trap data type: 0x31 (data access MMU miss)" in a kernel module

2008-01-18 Thread Vamsee Priya
Hi All, I have a kernel module which panics at 2 different places with the following pani message : trap data type: 0x31 (data access MMU miss) When does this kind of a trap occur actually? Thanks in advance Priya ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing l