Hi,
I have this problem mainly on sun fir x4500 (thumper) but it is not a hardware
issue ;)
I try to change the disk label from efi to solaris2 with fdisk, the result is:
primary label corrupt; using backup which is a sd problem. I found some hints
in the solaris developer express2/07 notes:
On Feb 13, 2008 2:54 AM, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell
It has been a long, long way since CR 655171. Thank you for the change.
Chris
--
^---^
(@)v(@) Chris Pickett
|/ IT consultant
===m==m=== [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jerry. Thank you for the information. I'm cc'ing
[EMAIL PROTECTED], where most of the CIFS folk hang out.
Janice
Jerry Backlin wrote:
Janice,
Below you have 2 files where the first one is written from a windows
system. It seems to pick up the right owner but the file protection is
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
What do you understand by *system* shell?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
it sounds like you need to import your zpool:
http://blogs.sun.com/tdh/entry/recovering_a_zfs_filesystem_after
Josh
On Feb 13, 2008 9:38 AM, Mark Walmsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The hard drive running my solaris died.
I had data on my slave drive with zfs partitions. Now I just assumed
The hard drive running my solaris died.
I had data on my slave drive with zfs partitions. Now I just assumed when i
installed a new solaris install on a new drive i would see my zfs partions on
the slave drive but i don't. Is that data also gone?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
What do you understand by *system* shell?
Jörg
It's the shell /usr/sh points to. This satisfies backward compatibility
so you're
On Feb 13, 2008 11:10 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
What do you understand by *system* shell?
/sbin/sh, /usr/bin/sh are now really ksh93.
The old shell
Hello,
I am sorry for this question but where do I need send a request to
change my email address in order to continue to received my email.
Thank you very much.
Mario
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 11:10 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
What do you understand by *system* shell?
/sbin/sh,
Depends on the target group. If you want this to be low cost, then no SSD. SSD
would double the price.
Therefore SATA drive, sound chip, integrated graphics, 100mbit NIC would be
fine.
I would really like it to be low cost. Almost rival SunRay in price? The
problem is SUN makes great
Hey,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Brian Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
What do you understand by *system* shell?
My fault for not figuring
That did it thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Brian Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
What do you understand by *system* shell?
Jörg
It's the shell /usr/sh points
Joerg Schilling wrote:
BTW: I vote against allowing to replace /sbin/sh by something different than
a
100% compatible Bourne shell for distributions that like to use the
OpenSolaris
trademark.
Discussions of what properties distros must have to use the OpenSolaris
trademark are being
On Feb 13, 2008 1:21 PM, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Brian Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
On Feb 13, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Rich Teer wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Shawn Walker wrote:
/usr/has/bin/sh
...since it is a hasbin :)
Groan!
korny
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Mario Mira wrote:
Hello,
I am sorry for this question but where do I need send a request to
change my email address in order to continue to received my email.
Send it me I'll take care of it.
You can send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the future.
Derek
Thank you very much.
Mario
We sell all kind of mobile phones, play stations, nintendo wii, game consoles,
electronics, laptops and accessories at affordable price,it has one year
international warranty,unlock,comes with company original seal pack,this phone
are all brand new direct from the manufacturers in English
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 11:10 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
What do you understand by *system*
Brian
Joerg is referring to the fact that ksh93 and bourne shell have some
minor incompatibilities. It is possible to write a script that will
work differently in the two shells. Academics have even written some
scripts to demonstrate these incompatibilities really exist.
The three users in
Hello,
Its been a while since I looked at getting a SATA
controller for my Sun Blade 1000. At the moment the
best option (i.e. the cheapest one that is known to
definately work) that I can see is the LSI Logic
3041X-R. This is a four port card, and I really only
need two ports. This costs
On Feb 13, 2008 8:44 PM, Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sigh. We have made no statements about compatibility with anything,
either past or future, in the preview releases. It's an experiment.
The negativity some of you have towards experiments just amazes me
sometimes.
But what's the
Peter Tribble wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 8:44 PM, Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sigh. We have made no statements about compatibility with anything,
either past or future, in the preview releases. It's an experiment.
The negativity some of you have towards experiments just amazes me
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Shawn Walker wrote:
/usr/has/bin/sh
...since it is a hasbin :)
Groan!
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer
http://www.myonlinehomeinventory.com
[ Bcc'ing advocacy-discuss and opensolaris-discuss to reduce cross-posting ]
Peter,
It would help a lot if the aims of this project were clearly explained
and enunciated, because I for one haven't a clue what they are, and
the more I think about it and look at what has been announced and
On Feb 13, 2008 3:12 PM, Brian Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian
Joerg is referring to the fact that ksh93 and bourne shell have some
minor incompatibilities. It is possible to write a script that will
work differently in the two shells. Academics have even written some
scripts to
I took everyones advice from like a year ago, and added a gig of ram
to my U10 333, so I could run Solaris 10, ultimately so I could play
with ZFS.
Performance is acceptable, but I'd like to jump to an x86 and Nextenta
(for better h/w performance, and because x86's are more versatile, and
I took everyones advice from like a year ago, and added a gig of ram
to my U10 333, so I could run Solaris 10, ultimately so I could play
with ZFS.
Performance is acceptable, but I'd like to jump to an x86 and Nextenta
(for better h/w performance, and because x86's are more versatile, and
Attached is a screenshot showing Indy2 running in SXDE4 under VirtualBox.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://picasaweb.google.com/WLiauh/RunningIndy2InSXDE4UnderVirtualBox
Screenshot 01: Splash screen after Indy2 LiveCD is inserted into SXDE4 CD drive
Screenshot 02: Indy2 LiveCD begins to run in SXDE4 under VirtualBox
Screenshot 03: First screen of Indy2 LiveCD running in SXDE4, selecting
Guess it didn't
Feb 13 22:17:12 solaris gda: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /[EMAIL
PROTECTED],0/pci8086,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0 (Disk3):
Feb 13 22:17:12 solaris Error for command 'write sector'Error
Level: Retryable
Feb 13
It pains me that Sun is doing so many great moves in open source, and there
are so many great people at Sun that get it, yet Sun decided to force it's
wishes on a captive community. I hope those of you that are working at Sun
that are trying to change things, don't get discouraged.
Based on Sun's
How much mem in the laptop?
run a swap -l
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I upgraded the processor in mine to a 450 cheap on ebay easy to do.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:49 AM, W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a screenshot showing Indy2 running in
SXDE4 under VirtualBox.
Jiva does not allow me to post screenshots, please see a separate thread:
On Feb 13, 2008 10:35 PM, Brian Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on Sun's recent decisions, it has become clear to me that Sun has
exercised their right to break the illusion that OpenSolaris is a community
run project. (It is rather, a community influenced project). I'm sure
Sun's
Seriously now... even I think this is getting silly, and I'm young and
foolish. A couple dozen people forking O/N?come now...
Al Hopper's right. The OGB was spineless, Sun was aggressive and
ignored the community. They'll do whatever they're going to do quite
aside from how we feel about
Hi John,
See it as you will, but to accuse the OGB of being spineless is a bit...
well unfounded and accusatory. FWIW, several OGB members were and
continue to be vocally opposed to Sun's decision (myself being one of
them), but when it boils down to it, it's Sun's decision for better or
for
Before you jump so hastily to criticize, please read the
OpenSolaris.org Statement of principles:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/
Our principles:
-
1) The project will evolve in full view of the world. By opening our
code, processes, documentation, and historical
Attached is a screenshot showing Indy2 running in
SXDE4 under VirtualBox.
I know I am getting carried away, but--
I used to work in Exxon's Prudhoe Bay field (at that time it was producing
close to 2 million barrels of oil a day). Located near the Arctic circle,
there were times I was
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Attached is a screenshot showing Indy2 running in
SXDE4 under VirtualBox.
I know I am getting carried away, but--
I used to work in Exxon's Prudhoe Bay field (at that time it was producing
close to 2 million barrels of oil a day). Located near the Arctic
42 matches
Mail list logo
