I have been tasked with trying to have SMF monitor our Peopelsoft instance. In
order to start the appserver I used a delivered compile module who, in our
instance starts 44 processes. Is SMF smart enough to recognize it was
responsible for starting all 44 and monitor them? Would I have to have
Dinarto wrote:
Thanks, Mark.
I'm checking the server as it's installed at customer's premises.
But, have you checked section #1, whether my informations that were filled
there are correct or not ?
There is no way for me to verify the information that you are supplying.
However, your
I did a little bit of search and eventually found a Sun Blue Prints document
explaining steps to create a Custom Jumpstart DVD
http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0806/819-7546.pdf.
I was able to follow the steps outlined in the document, by updating
/cdrom/boot/x86.miniroot contents:
* Replace
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Dave, for your confirmation of my intentions and assumptions, at
least in general:
1. The limitation in handling multiple Solaris fdisk partitions is a
function of the disk target driver. This is what I was
Why is cdrecord chosen for the nautilus burning tool? It just doesn't work
for me, neither loose files nor iso's. cdrw works great for CD's and DVD's,
however I have to use mkisofs to make an iso first. Currently I have to use
command line to burn stuff.
Also, in Linux the nautilus burner
Why is cdrecord chosen for the nautilus burning tool? It just doesn't work
for me, neither loose files nor iso's. cdrw works great for CD's and DVD's,
however I have to use mkisofs to make an iso first. Currently I have to
use command line to burn stuff.
I think at some point, nautilus
Euan Thoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is cdrecord chosen for the nautilus burning tool? It just doesn't work
for me, neither loose files nor iso's. cdrw works great for CD's and DVD's,
however I have to use mkisofs to make an iso first. Currently I have to
use command line to burn
I have been leading a group of writers working on a
companion to the Getting Started Guide. The idea
is to document some useful procedures to help configure
an OpenSolaris laptop after the OS is installed.
Please take a look at a review draft of the
OpenSolaris 2008.05 System Administration Guide
On 2/08/2008, at 9:49 AM, Euan Thoms wrote:
Why is cdrecord chosen for the nautilus burning tool? It just
doesn't work for me, neither loose files nor iso's. cdrw works
great for CD's and DVD's, however I have to use mkisofs to make an
iso first. Currently I have to use command line
I finally got around to fixing it. I was editing the wrong menu.lst.
Thanks alot guys. ZFS and ZFS Boot rock.
I can't believe how easy and how superior to other filesystems zfs is.
OpenSolaris is truly a 21st century unix.
I hope I never have to touch linux again from outside of a branded zone.
Is it possible to read an external hard drive with an ext3 filesystem from a
redhat branded zone?
Thanks in advance.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I have a feeling that Sun has abandoned maintaining Solaris, and shifted its
resources to OpenSolaris. Well, that's good news to people here, I guess.
So, can I discuss things about Solaris 10 here? How about something about
Solaris 10's C library? Can I ask a question why a certain library
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Ming Kin Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a feeling that Sun has abandoned maintaining Solaris, and shifted its
resources to OpenSolaris. Well, that's good news to people here, I guess.
So, can I discuss things about Solaris 10 here? How about something
No, it is about getnameinfo().
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The name which you gave suits your topic. Good name, it conveys something
about your topic.
---
[url=http://www.treatmentcenters.org/indiana]Indiana Treatment Centers[/url]
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Ming Kin Lai wrote:
I have a feeling that Sun has abandoned maintaining Solaris, and shifted its
resources to OpenSolaris. Well, that's good news to people here, I guess.
So, can I discuss things about Solaris 10 here? How about something about
Solaris 10's C library? Can I ask a question
Re: [osol-discuss] Can Solaris be discussed here?
From: Shawn Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Sat 8/02/08 5:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
These lists are for OpenSolaris, not Solaris. I'm not certain what gave you the
idea that Sun has abandoned
17 matches
Mail list logo
