Che Kristo wrote:
LWS was a godsend when it was around. I tried emailing the webmaster of
LWS not long after the shutdown and didn't get a response :-|
Check out http://solaris.homeunix.com/?q=node/11 for various multimedia
codecs for GStreamer, and if you find them useful donate by clicking
This is a pretty good thread on media related stuff as well:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=81497
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thanks very much for your patient reply. Yes, of course, it makes sense that
since osol is not natively a GNU system, its GNU libraries will be arranged
differently than on GNU/Linux systems, which means that scripts to build
applications will often need to be written differently for it.
My
Found this, which also might help:
http://wiki.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/Libdvdcss
I believe it's one of the more important components you need for VLC.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
Thanks very much for your patient reply. Yes, of course, it makes sense that
since osol is not natively a GNU system, its GNU libraries will be arranged
differently than on GNU/Linux systems, which means that scripts to build
applications will often need to be written
Thanks for that. But I don't actually care about VLC that much: I prefer
mplayer, and I'm getting by on the binary I got off Blastwave.
It's the principle that bothers me here: that people have managed to compile
VLC and mplayer under Solaris, but then they apparently did little to help
others
Ok. Let's stop flame and return to the constructive
discussion...
I'll try to compile totem from specs with enabled
debug if I have free time...
OK, thanks. But I think the core file (or even pstack
from the corefile)
can be good starting point.
It's not funny... GDB error while trying
I prefer mplayer, and I'm getting by on the binary I got off Blastwave.
It's the principle that bothers me here: that people have managed to compile
VLC and mplayer under Solaris, but then they apparently did little to help
others do the same.
Hi Herzen,
Actually, a lot of the people who
If you use IPSgawk instead of SUNWgawk and don't have IPSawk in the $PATH
before the old school ATT System V UNIX awk when you build, you will get an
error that looks something like this:
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/export/home/hliind/MPlayer-1.0rc2/vidix'
LC_ALL=C awk -f pci_db2c.awk pci.db
Since you said you wanted to learn how to compile mplayer from source on
OpenSolaris, here's another guide from the opensolaris.com web site that might
be even better than the one I previously posted:
http://forum.opensolaris.com/thread.jspa?threadID=684tstart=0
So you see, lots of people
On Friday 10 July 2009 06:44:02 Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
(I understand that if code gets sufficiently close to machine
level, then the code must be modified to work on a different OS.
(For example, I've ported SBCL (Steel Bank Common Lisp) from x86
Solaris to AMD64
I'm still lost in this stuff myself. Is there an issue with the a free codec or
the bringing of computer audio from note tones to copied studio sound. Are the
lines of licensing being crossed or something?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
After building gst-ffmpeg myself totem is not crashing on wma... However, there
are 2 issues:
- I can't check sound, because I've built it on VMware ESX VM (VM doesn't have
sound card).
- During build I had to move /usr/gnu/bin/ld to /usr/bin/ld (and after build -
restore it)...
Really,
Fujitsu chip, the SPARC64 VIIIfx, codenamed Venus
is so fast that it just destroys everything including
the best Intel chips, the best AMD chips, and the
best IBM Power chips and it was going to be ready for
production sooner than the Rock would have been.
I hope I read the article
Hi,
Alexander píše v pá 10. 07. 2009 v 00:22 -0700:
Ok. Let's stop flame and return to the constructive
discussion...
I'll try to compile totem from specs with enabled
debug if I have free time...
OK, thanks. But I think the core file (or even pstack
from the corefile)
can be
Alexander,
Alexander Pyhalov píše v pá 10. 07. 2009 v 13:18 +0400:
В пт, 10/07/2009 в 11:09 +0200, Milan Jurik пишет:
Hi,
Alexander píše v pá 10. 07. 2009 v 00:59 -0700:
After building gst-ffmpeg myself totem is not crashing on wma... However,
there are 2 issues:
- I can't
Most codecs require patent licenses, for example h.264,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264/MPEG-4_AVC#Patent_licensing
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:57 PM, john kroll jek0...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
I'm still lost in this stuff myself. Is there an issue with the a free
codec or the bringing of
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
The libraries you need are present as far as I know. However, you
should realise that many open source projects develop software that
often only correctly (or easily) compiles on GNU-based operating systems.
It seems that you missunderstand the
Alex Viskovatoff viskovat...@imap.cc wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
you should realise that many open source projects develop software that
often only correctly (or easily) compiles on GNU-based operating systems.
I'm confused. What then is the point of all those GNU packages in
OpenSolaris?
Nico Sabbi nicola.sa...@poste.it wrote:
for speed reasons there IS a lot of ASM optimized routines in the
single decoders, although the decoders are part of ffmpeg (that is
embedded in vlc) rather than in vlc itself. But the major problem is
not with optimized with ASM routines: most of
Hi all,
my OpenSolaris 2009.06 file server had an power outage this morning. Now on
restart I always get the message that boot-archive files don't match and that I
should repair the archive with the svcadm command. I'd love to do that, but I
can't login to system maintenance. Whether I boot in
have you tried booting from the live cd, importing the pool and
recreating the archive there?
nacho
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Benjamin
Feuchterbenjamin.feuch...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all,
my OpenSolaris 2009.06 file server had an power outage this morning. Now on
restart I always get the
I may have cheated, because I have LWS added as an IPS repo, and I have
everything from it installed, and I used it as a lib dir.
That's not very helpful, since the LWS IPS repo has been taken down.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Hi Guys,
trying to analyze this link:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/schedule/
I see the b111 was the last one marked as stabilization build. Do we
have a plan set for the next OpenSolaris stabilization build yet?
If so, is it possible to keep this page updated?
Thank you!
I tried, but it didn't work. When I boot the Live CD, I can import the rpool.
But when I mount it, I only can see two folders and three files, that's all it
will show me. With zfs list -t all I get all the pools, e.g. /ROOT/opensolaris,
but when I try to access the files/folders in it,
The default root password is opensolaris IIRC. Try that first and if you get
in remove /platform/i86pc/boot_archive . If not, boot another media, import
rpool and follow these steps:
Take note of what the current mountpoint is, then set a temporary one::
zfs get mountpoint
Erast wrote:
Hi Guys,
trying to analyze this link:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/schedule/
I see the b111 was the last one marked as stabilization build. Do we
have a plan set for the next OpenSolaris stabilization build yet?
There isn't one set yet.
If so, is it possible
Well I think there are some possibilities to consider as reasons for ROCK to be
canceled:
* The 8-core SPARC64 VIIIfx Venus processor out-performs ROCK
by a significant amount, thusly making it impractical to move forward
with ROCK.
* The 16-core UltraSPARC-KT Niagara 3
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 07:13 -0700, Marcelo H Majczak wrote:
Take note of what the current mountpoint is, then set a temporary one::
zfs get mountpoint rpool/ROOT/opensolaris
zfs set mountpoint=/mnt/xxx rpool/ROOT/opensolaris
This may not be necessary. Depending on the livecd, you can
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
The libraries you need are present as far as I know. However, you
should realise that many open source projects develop software that
often only correctly (or easily) compiles on GNU-based operating systems.
It seems that
i plan maybe to install solaris on a non solaris computer
are it possible
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
yes, a lot of us run solaris in dell, ibm and even whitebox servers.
if the hardware is more or less current, you should not have problems.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM, mattiasm...@mjw.se wrote:
i plan maybe to install solaris on a non solaris computer
are it possible
--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Octave Orgeron unixcons...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Octave Orgeron unixcons...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SPARC Rock is dead,
To: Anon Y Mous system5u...@yahoo.com, opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Date: Friday, July 10, 2009, 11:12 AM
Well I think there
Thanks!
Are the install text based or graphical
I'm a blind user..
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Ignacio Marambio Catán [mailto:darkjo...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 10 juli 2009 18:18
Till: mattias
Kopia: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ämne: Re: [osol-discuss] installation
yes, a
mattias wrote:
Thanks!
Are the install text based or graphical
I'm a blind user..
Graphical, but it supports a screen reader using ORCA.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Indeed, -R works as expected now (just tested with b117). Last time I needed
similar procedure, and it was a long time ago, -R didn't cover locally set
mount points.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Very true:)
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Octave J. Orgeron
Solaris Virtualization Architect and Consultant
Web: http://unixconsole.blogspot.com
E-Mail: unixcons...@yahoo.com
Hello everybody,
I have installed Opensolaris 2009.6 on a Lenovo Thinkpad X61 and on a Lenovo
Thinkpad R500;
with the former there are no problems and everything works fine -- if the
system is idle, there is a CPU-load of 0-3%; but on the R500 the CPU load is
always around 60-70% -- in the
use iostat to see if there is too much I/O occurring.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Holger Steinmann selban...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have installed Opensolaris 2009.6 on a Lenovo Thinkpad X61 and on a
Lenovo Thinkpad R500;
with the former there are no problems and everything
VirtualBox 3.0.0 fails to startup in a non-global zone just like 2.2.4 and
2.2.2. Only 2.2.0 seems to work in a non-global zone.
Which means I can't run OpenBSD because it gets seg faults and disk full errors
on 2.2.0. Can't run 2.2.4 because something is broken and it doesn't appear
thanks! If I run iostat I just get these values:
ttysd0 sd1cpu
tin tout kps tps serv kps tps serv us sy wt id
0 164 74 2 170 00 2 60 0 38
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
... on the R500 the CPU load is
always around 60-70% -- in the idle state!
With top, prstat, and vmstat I found out that this
high load is due to the kernel. I've checked out
several sites, and saw that this problem seems to
appear now and then, but I couldn't find a working
solution.
Hi
I'm unable to get my SNV 117 to see a 1,5 TB SATA drive I just got.
Ubuntu 9.04 install fine on the drive.
Window XP SP2 also installs fine on the drive.
Solaris: SNV 116/117 x86
Mother board: VIA CN 1000
Ram: 1GB
BIOS: 1.12 (Latest on the VIA site.)
HDD: Western Digital 1,5 TB SATA.
The
I've Opensolaris snv_111b (06/2009) system. It's booted into dom0 but no
domUs are configured. The system has a private network that uses zones
and vnics. Today I ran 'pfexec pkg image-update' in dom0 but I got the
following networking driver upgrade errors. Is this a known issue?
Thanks in
Hi everyone,
I installed OpenSolaris in my PC(IDE disk), but it doesn't recognize my SATA
controller.
However, somebody told me to submit my hardware information and wait a answer
of community. That's ok, but the submit button doesn't work, and doesn't work
on live cd too, on Device Driver
I'm unable to get my SNV 117 to see a 1,5 TB SATA drive I just got.
...
Solaris: SNV 116/117 x86
Mother board: VIA CN 1000
What cpu? Is that a 32-bit cpu?
The 32-bit Solaris kernel does not support disks 1TB
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
You can also force a text installation (option 1 I believe).
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ron Halstead wrote:
You can also force a text installation (option 1 I believe).
The text installation option is not available for OpenSolaris 2009.x
releases yet.
I believe you are thinking of the Solaris Express Community Releases.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
В пт, 10/07/2009 в 11:09 +0200, Milan Jurik пишет:
Hi,
Alexander píše v pá 10. 07. 2009 v 00:59 -0700:
After building gst-ffmpeg myself totem is not crashing on wma... However,
there are 2 issues:
- I can't check sound, because I've built it on VMware ESX VM (VM doesn't
have sound
I noticed that the /usr/xpg4/bin area seems to be well filled on the Live
CD image with the exception of the SUNWxcu4t ( XCU4 make and sccs
utilities ) however XCU6 Utilities were missing entirely. This came up as
a matter of discussion at a datacenter where we began to debate standards
compliant
Herzen- did you try this method:
http://blogs.sun.com/lewiz/entry/compiling_mplayer_on_opensolaris_2008
and get it to work? (with the official SUN gawk package instead of IPSgawk of
course)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Thanks for the suggestion. I've tried that before, and I just tried it again.
The build fails:
cc -o mplayer mplayer.o m_property.o mp_fifo.o mp_msg.o mixer.o parser-mpcmd.o
subopt-helper.o command.o asxparser.o codec-cfg.o cpudetect.o edl.o find_sub.o
get_path.o m_config.o m_option.o
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 16:29 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
However, there is every intention that OpenSolaris(tm) will be compliant
with all such reasonable specs eventually. Right? Is there a project or
group that knows such things?
I'm not in such a group, but I see that the XCU6 utilities are
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I noticed that the /usr/xpg4/bin area seems to be well filled on the Live
CD image with the exception of the SUNWxcu4t ( XCU4 make and sccs
utilities ) however XCU6 Utilities were missing entirely. This came up as
a matter of discussion at a datacenter where we began to
Yes, that's what I tried, as I noted in my post from 4:15 PM above. I pasted
the error message I got into that post.
I just tried it again, this time putting /usr/bin in front of /opt/csw/bin, and
got the same result. (The blog entry you gave a link to has a typo:
/opt/csw/gnu should be
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I noticed that the /usr/xpg4/bin area seems to be well filled on the
Live
CD image with the exception of the SUNWxcu4t ( XCU4 make and sccs
utilities ) however XCU6 Utilities were missing entirely. This came up
as
a matter of discussion at a datacenter where we began
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 16:29 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
However, there is every intention that OpenSolaris(tm) will be compliant
with all such reasonable specs eventually. Right? Is there a project or
group that knows such things?
I'm not in such a group, but I see that the XCU6 utilities
I looked at
[url=http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=104595tstart=0]this
thread[/url], which I'd seen before. A certain Shawn Walker notes there:
You'll be happy to know that the next build of OpenSolaris 2009.x will
deliver: sunwbinut...@2.19,5.11-0.116:20090616T183435Z
Also,
This bug http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=326435#326435
seems to back in sorts. If I run installgrub in snv_117 all I see is a light
blue screen and it does not care/display the splashimage file.
This was last checked ok in snv_114. Any help is appreciated.
--
This message
roland wrote:
The 32-bit Solaris kernel does not support disks 1TB
which is a major annoyance.
let 1 or 2 years go by, and disks 1TB will be standard.
As will 64 bit systems!
--
Ian.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
I had the same issue in HP laptop ( dv6k). when it supposed to start xwindow,
somehow it's not able to bring up GUI. but there wasn't no error. Then i
increased Video mem from default 4MB to 15 MB in Virtual Box and it booted to
GUI.
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Alex Viskovatoff viskovat...@imap.cc wrote:
From: Alex Viskovatoff viskovat...@imap.cc
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] VLC 1.0.0 is out, but it doesn't compile under
osol 2009.06
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Date: Friday, July 10, 2009, 4:51 PM
Yes, that's
Thanks for clearing that up!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has successfully installed opensolaris on a USB
stick, (not a LIVEcd) but an actual working installation.
I am trying to setup a zraid zfs pool on a server and would prefer the OS to be
run off of usb flash drive, instead of the primary drive. Does anyone
Wait a second herzen, why don't you have /usr/gnu/bin first in your $PATH? You
need to build this with the GNU utilities and not with the System V UNIX ones.
Can you type in this command:
echo $PATH
and copy and paste the results here?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Herzen, are you building mplayer as a normal user in 2009.06 or trying to build
it as the root user?
The reason I am asking is this. When a normal user does the
echo $PATH
command in OpenSolaris 2009.06, they get these results:
:~$ echo $PATH
I looked at this thread, which I'd seen before. A certain Shawn Walker notes
there:
That thread is pretty good. I guess it's only the newer versions of mplayer
that have this problem, because I was able to build a much older version on
Solaris successfully over a year ago.
--
This message
Here's the PATH I have when I try to build mplayer and other GNU software:
/usr/gnu/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/opt/texlive/2008/bin/i386-solaris
I understood this issue not so long after I got into Solaris.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I also was able to build mplayer on OpenSolaris once, last fall. But the result
was less functional than what I got off Blastwave, so I discarded it.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Of course I'm not building mplayer as root! Why would I do that? I hardly ever
use su any more, since pfexec is so much more elegant...
I'm running snv_117 now, since it turns out that I was wrong when I thought
that sound is broken under snv_117 on my system. I tried compiling mplayer from
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Alex Viskovatoffviskovat...@imap.cc wrote:
Of course I'm not building mplayer as root! Why would I do that? I hardly
ever use su any more, since pfexec is so much more elegant...
I'm running snv_117 now, since it turns out that I was wrong when I thought
This morning I was able to build an IPS zone in ~83 seconds. Now the new zone
I installed was 509 seconds.
Is there an explanation why this is happening?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Gary Bainbridge wrote:
This morning I was able to build an IPS zone in ~83 seconds. Now the new zone
I installed was 509 seconds.
Is there an explanation why this is happening?
Since creating zones currently requires network access, the time of this
will greatly vary.
At some future
73 matches
Mail list logo
