Hi Joerg,
Maybe you set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH in .bashrc or .profile.
Can you try to unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH and run firefox again in terminal?
If it doesn't work. Then maybe you firefox profile is destroyed.
Try to backup $HOME/.mozilla directory and start firefox again.
Regards,
Leon Sha
Jo
> Because it doesn't work with IPS packages, and the IPS-capable version wasn't
> ready in time for the 2009.06 release.
Well, that makes sense then, as the main feature Indiana has that none of the
other OpenSolaris based distros have is IPS. Never understood why the text
installer wouldn't wo
>Is this your problem?
>Brian
Brian, I'm actually not having any problems with the sound on any of my
OpenSolaris boxes. I was just trying to help out some of the people like
eldomir, anil2009, and ceezy10, etc. who were having problems in this thread:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.
HeCSa wrote:
Today I've added the entry
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=10049 , because the
Package Manager in snv_118 is not showing the correct "Downloaded" size,
which grow, shrink, grow, shrink, grow again, etc.
This happened today to me when using it to download the SunStudi
Anon Y Mous wrote:
> You can do a minimal server install using the always awesome text installer
> in Solaris Express or Solaris 10 (keep in mind that Solaris Express IS a
> variant of OpenSolaris, although you have to sign up with Sun to download
> it).
>
> When you do a text install, there
John wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible upgrade to a specific Dev branch?
For example, I would like to install 2009.06 and update to 117, not 118.
At this time, an upgrade mechanism that lets you go to a specific build
is not available. It is hoped that one will eventually be available,
but it depen
Not that I am aware of, you could downlaod the 117 iso...
http://www.genunix.org/distributions/indiana/osol-1002-117-x86.iso
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:19 AM, John wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible upgrade to a specific Dev branch?
> For example, I would like to install 2009.06 and update to 117,
Today I've added the entry
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=10049 , because the
Package Manager in snv_118 is not showing the correct "Downloaded" size,
which grow, shrink, grow, shrink, grow again, etc.
This happened today to me when using it to download the SunStudio12u1.
Best reg
Hi,
Is it possible upgrade to a specific Dev branch?
For example, I would like to install 2009.06 and update to 117, not 118.
Sorry if this has been asked before...
Thanks,
J.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
You can do a minimal server install using the always awesome text installer in
Solaris Express or Solaris 10 (keep in mind that Solaris Express IS a variant
of OpenSolaris, although you have to sign up with Sun to download it).
When you do a text install, there's a menu that lets you choose whi
> Yep, you can delete all directories with hexadecimal
> names under
> /var/pkg/download IF you take in consideration:
>
> many, if not most, of the blocks will be
> consumed for older
> snapshots/BEs. You'll have to remove the snapshots,
> too -- beadm destroy
> would be the correct w
I have a few blogs about getting multimedia set up which we could use:
http://myunix.org/2009/07/13/dvd-playback-on-opensolaris-the-foss-way/ ,
http://myunix.org/2008/12/22/getting-software-for-opensolaris/ lets identify
all of the areas of need and find existing blogs that cover the topic - we
can
Does anyone have any comments on what I put in the initial ODT file?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Same happened to me.
The workaround works perfectly.
Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
HeCSa.
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 00:25 -0700, Rob Johnston wrote:
> Yeah - I hit that one, too. It's a known issue - see the following bug
> report
> for a workaround:
>
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug
I'm interested in installing minimal OpenSolaris as the only OS on HD with ZFS
GUI. Any idea when this may become possible?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
We need to do some additional database maintenance, so the site will be
down tomorrow morning, July 14th, for approximately 1 hour starting at
3:30am PT [6:30 am ET/10:30 am GMT].
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
_
Robert Hartzell wrote:
> > If you have only one adaptor, you would get into problems as it may be
> > impossible to define a login for a usually non-existing terminal device.
> >
> > Jörg
> >
>
> I never thought of that, well at least it works with the cable reversed.
> I just don't like pl
It is possible to install Windows in VirtualBox. The performance is normal
Windows I think. Maybe benchmarks says it differs, but for normal use you will
not notice. I am running windowsXP and Ubuntu at the same time. Full speed.
Multi core are supported.
Video: there is experimental 3D suppor
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to run Windows as a VM on OS, or SXCE?
Very.
In VirtualBox?
In Xvm?
Either.
What is performance like?
Fine.
How does video work?
What do you want to know?
Can windows be made full screen so that noone using it would know it's
a virtual machin
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Robert W Hartzell wrote:
I'm trying to redirect the console login to a usb serial port instead of
ttya but not having much luck figuring out which device to use for
/dev/term/0.
ls -l /dev/term
0 -> ../../devices/p...@0,0/pci1043,8...@2/dev...@6:0
a ->
Hi,
Is it possible to run Windows as a VM on OS, or SXCE?
In VirtualBox?
In Xvm?
What is performance like?
How does video work?
Can windows be made full screen so that noone using it would know it's a
virtual machine?
How do you get back to Solaris? Some key combo?
How is 3D graphics perfo
While running OpenSolaris snv_116 I did an upgrade which created a new
BE running OS snv_118. I restarted OS and chose OS snv_118 to boot.
What I see is the OS boot screen with the progress bar moving and it has
been doing that for about an hour. Has anyone had success with this?
A reminder th
Anon Y Mous wrote:
We've got a very detailed thread about sound issues in the newer
builds of OpenSolaris going on here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=395746
Could you try the following test:
1) Try running gnome-volume-control. You will notice at the top there
Anon Y Mous wrote:
> Sun / Oracle should just do the exact same thing that Red Hat does with Linux.
>
> Let's see here. Red Hat supports two distributions that are based on the same
> code:
>
> Fedora is a rapidly changing community based distribution that is provided
> free of charge and incor
Yup, ~80% of their customers are on Solaris. I think that pretty much settles
it when you think about it. Oracle is in business to make money, not pander to
the Linux folks. If their paying customers are on Solaris and they own it, it's
the platform of choice, simple as that. Oracle will make m
Also, Ellisson said something about Oracle having more Solaris installations
than Linux installations.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
It is extremely annoying that journalistic hacks attack something they know
nothing about. I was considering putting a blog post out about it, but decided
not to in the end as it's just a waste of time and Ben already go there before
me:)
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
On 14/07/2009 14:56, Brian Ruthven - Solaris Network Sustaining - Sun UK
wrote:
This sounds like bug 6853997 - see
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6853997
Try the workaround.
If so, it's fixed in build 119.
Brian
The workaround
ssh -Xf -o HostKeyAlias=hostname hos
This sounds like bug 6853997 - see
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6853997
Try the workaround.
If so, it's fixed in build 119.
Brian
Rob McMahon wrote:
I've just updated to b118 (from 117), and something nasty seems to
have happened to ssh. Each connection to a kno
I've just updated to b118 (from 117), and something nasty seems to have
happened to ssh. Each connection to a known host comes back with, e.g.,
The authenticity of host '�t
P� ()' can't be established.
RSA key fingerprint is
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)?
This is a
I've just updated to b118 (from 117), and something nasty seems to have
happened to ssh. Each connection to a known host comes back with, e.g.,
The authenticity of host '�t
P� ()' can't be established.
RSA key fingerprint is
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)?
I know the hos
There is no "enrollment fee", it is a community resource with less of the
governance on osol.org...a scratchpad i guess
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:32 PM, john kroll wrote:
> What is your tuition enrollment fee at genunix.com ?? Is it better than
> Sun tech university?
> --
> This message posted
What is your tuition enrollment fee at genunix.com ?? Is it better than Sun
tech university?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Good idea...if no one does it over the next couple of days I will wikify it
over at genunix when I get some free time
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Calum Benson wrote:
>
> On 14 Jul 2009, at 04:44, david wrote:
>
> Thank you both for wanting to help. The Desktop community would be a good
>>
On 14 Jul 2009, at 04:44, david wrote:
Thank you both for wanting to help. The Desktop community would be
a good place I think if they accept us.
Also, sorry, I got an email that looked like you both had emailed me
so I sent a reply. Then I came here and saw that the emails were
really
--- On Tue, 7/14/09, Dave Lin wrote:
> From: Dave Lin
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Upgrade OSOL2010.02-beta to GNOME 2.26.3
> To: "Jerry Tan" , "ken mays"
> Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 3:57 AM
> Dave Lin wrote:
> > Jerry Tan wrote:
> >> According
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Amitava Dutta wrote:
> Is Oracle getting ready to kill OpenSolaris?
>
> asks Steven J Vaughan Nichols in ComputerWorld.
>
> People outside of IT seldom think of Oracle as a Linux company, but it is.
> Not only does Oracle encourage its customers to use its own hous
On snv 117, Mozilla firefox comes up with a white screen and it
seems that anything but file:/// URLs are just ignored.
Did anyone see the same problem?
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)
Really I don't think there are many "attacks" on Solaris anyway, just a few
vocal drongo's who think people wish to hear their opinions. On the whole I
hear positive things especially since Solaris 10...
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:54 PM, david wrote:
> Is Oracle getting ready to kill OpenSolaris?
Is Oracle getting ready to kill OpenSolaris? Nope.
If Oracle means to "kill" OpenSolaris, what could they actually do? They could
fire all the Solaris people and stop all corporate funding, sure but are they
going to do that, no.
The dude who wrote that article clearly is a big IBM fan an
Robert W Hartzell wrote:
> I'm trying to redirect the console login to a usb serial port instead of
> ttya but not having much luck figuring out which device to use for
> /dev/term/0.
>
> ls -l /dev/term
> 0 -> ../../devices/p...@0,0/pci1043,8...@2/dev...@6:0
> a -> ../../devices/p.
Dave Lin wrote:
Jerry Tan wrote:
According to gnome schedule, its 2.26.3 tarball due day is Jul 1st.
Desktop will bump to that version also.
it may be 119 or 120.
I'm afraid not, Jerry. We have no plan to bump to 2.26.3 on stable
branch as there is no release targets Gnome2.26.x. We are now mov
Yeah - I hit that one, too. It's a known issue - see the following bug report
for a workaround:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=9960
rob
Konstantin Lebedev wrote:
After updating to snv_118 there is an error at a loading stage:
Jul 14 10:37:26 svc.startd[7]: svc:/network/fc
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=107862 - Has just read. The
problem is solved.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Please read the release notes...
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Konstantin Lebedev wrote:
> After updating to snv_118 there is an error at a loading stage:
>
> Jul 14 10:37:26 svc.startd[7]: svc:/network/fcoe_config:default: Method
> "/lib/svs/method/fcoeconfig/" failed start with exit status 1
On 14/07/2009, at 7:10 PM, Konstantin Lebedev wrote:
After updating to snv_118 there is an error at a loading stage:
Jul 14 10:37:26 svc.startd[7]: svc:/network/fcoe_config:default:
Method "/lib/svs/method/fcoeconfig/" failed start with exit status
127.
Jul 14 10:37:26 svc.startd[7]: svc:/
After updating to snv_118 there is an error at a loading stage:
Jul 14 10:37:26 svc.startd[7]: svc:/network/fcoe_config:default: Method
"/lib/svs/method/fcoeconfig/" failed start with exit status 127.
Jul 14 10:37:26 svc.startd[7]: svc:/network/fcoe_config:default: Method
"/lib/svs/method/fcoeco
47 matches
Mail list logo
