> Another powerful security feature that Solaris 10 has
> that OpenBSD doesn't have is trusted extensions:
>
>
> ttp://osug.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/screensho
> t.png
>
> If you look at the link above you can see that the
> different windows and documents are classified at
> different l
+--
| On 2010-01-05 22:20:35, Anon Y Mous wrote:
|
| or do you think it's just more anti-Solaris F.U.D. ?
Published December 10, 2006
EOF
--
bda
cyberpunk is dead. long live cyberpunk.
__
Do any of you here think that this Oracle related article has any truth to it:
http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/2006/12/10/no-more-oracle-ports-to-solarisaixhp-ux-after-oracle11g/
or do you think it's just more anti-Solaris F.U.D. ?
To me this article doesn't make any sense at all: the Applicat
I personally would not use OpenSolaris for a minimal firewall appliance because
the OpenSolaris 2009.06 "Caimain" installer is very inflexible: It forces you
to use DHCP (there's no way to set a static IP address set during the
installation process- and you obviously don't want "network auto-mag
I am running Solaris Express Community Edition snv_127 X86.
I am having promblems running virt-manager (the GUI XVM manager.) When I run
virt-manager I get the following warning:
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module": ld.so.1: isapython2.4:
fatal: libpk-gtk-module.so: open fail
Sven Aluoor wrote:
Hi folks
[Please add me CC]
How to redirect "command --help" to file?
Why normal way doesn't work?
keytool --help > /tmp/keytool
The help text is written to stderr, not stdout. From sh or ksh, try
keytool --help 2>/tmp/keytool
instead.
Scott
--
Scot
Hi folks
[Please add me CC]
How to redirect "command --help" to file?
Why normal way doesn't work?
> keytool --help > /tmp/keytool
or
> keytool --help | tee /tmp/keytool
keytool usage:
[...]
> cat /tmp/keytool
[-providerClass [-providerArg ]] ...
cheers Sven
__
> Hi,
>
> The fix is on track to make build 132 and 2010.02.
>
> I have checked this issue. The R600 does power off
> but it takes a very long
> time (approx 2-3 minutes).
Cool - thanks for the update.
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Hi all,
Hoping someone can help with this. I went to the HCL pages and the T42 was
listed as compatible for OpenSolaris, but I couldn't find anything on my
printer which is a Samsung ML-1740 laser printer (cheap one from around 2005.)
Is it possible to get it up and running? I tried the Mana
> Oh I agree, but I bet there's a lot of us who have
> been using, live
> upgrading, testing and providing feedback on SXCE
> since it was a stroppy
> teenager and haven't made the leap into the
> OpenSolaris realm. It's
> been too stable for its own good.
>
> --
> Ian.
>
Of course! I have
Hi,
The fix is on track to make build 132 and 2010.02.
I have checked this issue. The R600 does power off but it takes a very long
time (approx 2-3 minutes).
Vikram
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 10:12:39 am andrew wrote:
> The following comments were added to CR 6913815:
>
> This is a IOMMU rel
> On 01/ 5/10 06:12 AM, andrew wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jan 3, 2010, at 6:53 AM, andrew wrote:
> >>
> On 01/ 1/10 10:36 AM, andrew wrote:
> > Sorry - my mistake. Still looking for ability
> to
> install from local files though. ;-)
>
> You can do that now as long as you're willin
The following comments were added to CR 6913815:
This is a IOMMU related issue. It's a dup of
6884091 Portege R600 doesn't power all-the-way down after "poweroff" is
uttered if IOMMU is enabled
Vikram is having a fix for this via 6889221, so I'm closing this as a dup of
6889221 also.
Can you t
On 22 Dec 2009, at 06:25, Vikram Dhillon wrote:
> Hi all,
>Hope everyone is doing good. I am currently writing documentation for
> Ubuntu, Kubuntu, GNOME, KDE, Firefox and FreeBSD so I have some experience in
> writing :D Now I would like to get started with documentation in OpenSolaris
Joseph Mocker wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm curious if there is a good location that contains a list of changes,
> enhancements, bug fixes, etc for each OpenSolaris dev release?
>
> The email that comes out on opensolaris-announce, as far as I can tell,
> only includes IPS bugfixes, etc.
>
> I've a
Hi Folks,
I'm curious if there is a good location that contains a list of changes,
enhancements, bug fixes, etc for each OpenSolaris dev release?
The email that comes out on opensolaris-announce, as far as I can tell,
only includes IPS bugfixes, etc.
I've also found the "Flag Days" pages,
On 01/ 5/10 06:12 AM, andrew wrote:
On Jan 3, 2010, at 6:53 AM, andrew wrote:
On 01/ 1/10 10:36 AM, andrew wrote:
Sorry - my mistake. Still looking for ability to
install from local files though. ;-)
You can do that now as long as you're willing to
run
a depot server
(which is a very ligh
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010, Shawn Walker wrote:
> I know this may not please some people, but which would you rather
> have? A known buggy, unmaintained for years version of vi, or a
> recent version of vim with vi compatibility?
What about a 3rd choice: nvi (or vi from OpenBSD who updated their
versi
Hi all,
I need to deploy a new perimetral security infraestructure to install the
following services:
- High availability and load balacing firewalls
- VPNs
- IDS/IPS
My first choice to install this scenario is to use openBSD, but will be possible
to do this with opensolaris?? The mos i
Luca Morettoni wrote:
> As reported in bug 13598[1] (opened by me) the changes in build 130
> introduce a bug related to DRM with Intel video card, any hope to see
> that fixed in build 131?
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1] http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13598
Since build 131 closed last ni
>
>
>
>
> andrew wrote:
> cite="mid:1485805089.881262654193109.JavaMail.Twebapp
> sf-app1"
> type="cite">
> It doesn't have an option to use
> external power, however I'm assuming I can power it
> off a USB port on another PC. I'll give that a try
> tomorrow.
> I can tell you that the power
This has been discussed before on this list (I don't have a reference
handy , but google should be your friend here, and I think it was Nick
Todd who posted it).
From memory, the steps are something like this:
beadm create snv-126
beadm mount snv-126 /mnt
pkg install -R /mnt ent...@0.5.11,5.
Not that I am aware of. You could just download that particular release as
an ISO and install it...
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 21:51, Vinicius Segantin Viteri <
vinicius.vit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I configured my repository to http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/ and
> always that i use "pkg image
As reported in bug 13598[1] (opened by me) the changes in build 130
introduce a bug related to DRM with Intel video card, any hope to see
that fixed in build 131?
Thanks!
[1] http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13598
--
Luca Morettoni | OpenSolaris SCA #OS0344
Web/BLOG: http://ww
>
> On Jan 3, 2010, at 6:53 AM, andrew wrote:
>
> >> On 01/ 1/10 10:36 AM, andrew wrote:
> >>> Sorry - my mistake. Still looking for ability to
> >> install from local files though. ;-)
> >>
> >> You can do that now as long as you're willing to
> run
> >> a depot server
> >> (which is a very li
Hi,
I configured my repository to http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/ and
always that i use "pkg image-update" the system is upgraded to the
last version (snv_130 now). But i don't want the snv_130. Is there any
configuration on pkg that i can set to upgrade the opensolaris snv_111
(release) to snv_12
Shawn Walker wrote:
On Jan 4, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Volker A. Brandt wrote:
Happy new year every1!
130 is the final SXCE release planned though, as previously announced.
Which is too bad, really. Maybe
andrew wrote:
It doesn't have an option to use external power, however I'm assuming I can
power it off a USB port on another PC. I'll give that a try tomorrow.
I can tell you that the power is shut off to the USB port since the eSATA
enclosure has a blue light that is illuminated when power
Shawn Walker wrote:
> The vi that was previously delivered was replaced with vim's vi compatibility
> mode. The reason? The vi traditionally delivered with Solaris is
> essentially completely unmaintained. As has been discussed before, much of
> the Solaris userland is being obsoleted, drop
I was able to compile and install it using http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/
a) Install SFE environment and build pkgtool and cd
/path/to/build/of/packages/spec-files-extra.2009116
b) pkgtool build-only --svr4 --download --autodeps --interactive
SFEeventlog.spec (build-only, because installation
Hi Masa,
Thx for responding:
I have used netperf, here's the ouput:
jer...@ex58ud501:~/Downloads/netperf-2.4.5/src# ./netperf
TCP STREAM TEST from :::0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to ex58ud501
(127.0.0.1) port 0 AF_INET
Recv SendSend
Socket Socket Message
On Jan 4, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Volker A. Brandt wrote:
>>
>>> Happy new year every1!
>>>
>>>
>>>
130 is the final SXCE release planned though, as previously announced.
>>> Which is too bad, really. Maybe the infrastructure to b
On Jan 2, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010, Jürgen Keil wrote:
> [OpenSolaris Indiana: GNU?]
>
>> Well, it does have both the gnu utilities (/usr/gnu/bin)
>> and the solaris counterparts, and in the default setup
>> the /usr/gnu/bin directory is ahead of /usr/bin i
On Jan 3, 2010, at 6:53 AM, andrew wrote:
>> On 01/ 1/10 10:36 AM, andrew wrote:
>>> Sorry - my mistake. Still looking for ability to
>> install from local files though. ;-)
>>
>> You can do that now as long as you're willing to run
>> a depot server
>> (which is a very light-weight easy to sta
34 matches
Mail list logo
