You're right.
My memory was that he'd resigned and I only found news articles saying as much
(and until I corrected it, the Wikipedia article also stated he'd resigned;
unfortunately I can't fix the news articles that say he resigned rather than
not being offered a position at Oracle). I had
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Paul Armstrong opensola...@otoh.org wrote:
You're right.
My memory was that he'd resigned and I only found news articles saying as
much (and until I corrected it, the Wikipedia article also stated he'd
resigned; unfortunately I can't fix the news articles
You (Stephen Bunn) wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com
wrote:
it appears the so called writers,reporters from many well respected
news sites are actually in a way
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:44 +0200, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
You (Stephen Bunn) wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com
wrote:
it appears the so called writers,reporters
You (Martin Bochnig) wrote:
I responded to Edward Martinez, exactly because I did not agree with
him in that new context.
Of course partially he is right. But it is Oracle(Management´s) very
very own fault. The put gazoline into that fire!
By just doing n o t h i n g.
Didn´t I state this?
You (Martin Bochnig) wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com
wrote:
it appears the so called writers,reporters from many well respected news
sites are actually in a way wishing the demise of opensolaris. almost
every article written on
There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not
being talked about.
Oscar Wilde
Apple spent a shed load of cash to get everyone to talk about their new release
by dropping selective information in the news, under cover articles,
speculation,sometime before a
Thank you for your reply. I guess I have been trying to understand it in
solaris type terms of gnome or cde with ubuntu holding an option of either
edubuntu or kubuntu. But I see its way more than that since eucalyptus has its
own public cloud. I'm really new to attempting to understand
Hi Ghenry,
you work looks interesting (and packages too).
Have you found way to fix package repository?
Regards.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Some things to check:
1) Was the dump created in accordance with the man page
(specifically, the unmounted or mounted read-only part)?
2) Was the system in single-user mode when the dump was taken?
3) What system was the dump created on?
4) What system are you trying to extract
Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de wrote:
You can try to blame Oracle for not calling it alive, but look:
http://c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6510-Future-of-OpenSolaris.html
Is this proof of an engagement TOWARDS OpenSolaris?
Being interested in supporting OSS and not giving
So, folks, again, GET USED TO the new communication,
and DO NEVER EVER draw
WRONG conclusions!
It's so easy!
Normally I would agree, but I know for a fact that this lack of communication
about a way forward with Sun products is driving businesses away. Every
businesses that I talk to is
2010/4/21 Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de:
You (Martin Bochnig) wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com
wrote:
it appears the so called writers,reporters from many well respected
news sites are actually in a way wishing the demise of
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Alexander Eremin ere...@milax.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:44 +0200, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
You (Stephen Bunn) wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Edward Martinez
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 15:28 +0300, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Hello. What? You prefer the head_into_the_sand-approach???
If +1 in that manner,
then the same as response:
Do you get it or don´t you
Oracle´s DB is pretty much a monopoly. *There* they can do whatever
they want, including
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Mike DeMarco mikej...@yahoo.com wrote:
So, folks, again, GET USED TO the new communication,
and DO NEVER EVER draw
WRONG conclusions!
It's so easy!
Normally I would agree, but I know for a fact that this lack of communication
about a way forward with Sun
Fully agree that many variables changed since Oracle got Sun. As I posted on
solarisx86 yahoo
mailing list we need to wait a bit longer for all these things to be cleared
but as well
Oracle should commit and dont let space for confusion and mis-interpretations
in a proper time frame window ;)
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Alexander Eremin ere...@milax.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 15:28 +0300, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Hello. What? You prefer the head_into_the_sand-approach???
If +1 in that manner,
then the same as response:
Do you get it or don´t you
Oracle´s DB is
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Stefan Parvu stefanparv...@yahoo.com wrote:
Fully agree that many variables changed since Oracle got Sun. As I posted on
solarisx86 yahoo
mailing list we need to wait a bit longer for all these things to be cleared
but as well
Oracle should commit and dont
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Stefan Parvu stefanparv...@yahoo.com wrote:
But this will take some time.
FQ4' 2018 would be a good quarter for a first announcement and (maybe)
meeting.
What do you folks think?
Mike
You (Mike DeMarco) wrote:
So, folks, again, GET USED TO the new communication,
and DO NEVER EVER draw
WRONG conclusions!
It's so easy!
Normally I would agree, but I know for a fact that this lack of communication
about a way forward with Sun products is driving businesses
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:44:27 +0200
Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de wrote:
Folks, also again:
CALM DOWN!
As I stated now MULTIPLE TIMES. Times are changing, GET USED TO IT!
Oracle is a company (and you can proff it by yourself, if you LOOK
BACK at Oracle's history of roadmaps and
You (Stephen Bunn) wrote:
Second.. and to be frank; This is what upsets most of us that are
upset. The arrogance in your (and Oracle's) attitude.
I'm not arrogant. Oracle might be, can't judge...
You seem to be
operating under the assumption that Open/Solaris is the only game in
town and
On 21.04.2010 14:15, Mike DeMarco wrote:
So, folks, again, GET USED TO the new communication,
and DO NEVER EVER draw
WRONG conclusions!
It's so easy!
Normally I would agree, but I know for a fact that this lack of communication
about a way forward with Sun products is driving businesses
Martin Bochnig wrote:
As far as I am aware, until now Oracle did not even talk to the OGB.
I believe the OGB still has an open offer to meet with Oracle representatives
once the new OGB manages to pick a meeting time.
Unfortunately, we elected an OGB for which picking a good meeting time will
Thanks for the responses here (and by email)!
It sounds like the amount of work it would take to sanity-check our Solaris 10
betas on 2009.06 would be minimal: at least to get it out there and get
feedback... and use such releases to test the waters. Even if it means our SE
team carrying the
...after some experimentation, we've set up a private network, on its own
subnet, to serve up multiple zones from one openSolaris box...
One of these zones houses our name server (BIND 9.7.0); intention was to
effectively 'chroot' it in this way, while serving DNS requests via the 'real'
I was shocked to find that the drivers for all sorts of storage and
network adapters (including for pretty standard stuff like the Adaptec
Ultra320 SCSI cards and Broadcom wired network cards) that have been
supported by open drivers in Linux and *BSD since more or less the
beginning of time ;)
Hi,
I recently installed b134 from the live CD on my Dell Lattitude D630
laptop. I can't remember now if the live CD used a graphical boot, but
if it did it worked fine. The graphical boot on the installed system
however spontaneously reboots my machine every time within 1-2 seconds
of
This has been discussed multiple times already here on this alias... ;-)
Please check the archives, as I'm currently answering from my mobile...
Search for 134 boot loop, that should provide enough hits, best would be an
email from John Martin...
Matthias
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:08:22 +0200, Matthias Pfützner
matth...@pfuetzner.de wrote:
This has been discussed multiple times already here on this alias... ;-)
Please check the archives, as I'm currently answering from my mobile...
Search for 134 boot loop, that should provide enough hits, best
So I can obviously see what zpools I have imported... but how do I see
pools that have been exported? Kind of like being able to see deported
volumes using vxdisk -o alldgs list.
Justin
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Justin Lee Ewing wrote:
So I can obviously see what zpools I have imported... but how do I see
pools that have been exported? Kind of like being able to see
deported volumes using vxdisk -o alldgs list.
Justin
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
On 04/21/10 02:16 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
Justin Lee Ewing wrote:
So I can obviously see what zpools I have imported... but how do I
see pools that have been exported? Kind of like being able to see
deported volumes using vxdisk -o alldgs list.
Justin
Justin Lee Ewing wrote:
On 04/21/10 02:16 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
Justin Lee Ewing wrote:
So I can obviously see what zpools I have imported... but how do I
see pools that have been exported? Kind of like being able to see
deported volumes using vxdisk -o alldgs list.
Justin
Martin,
This is a fundamental misstatement of Oracle's position as a software
vendor prior to acquiring Sun. Oracle faces considerable competition
from sources such as MS SQL Server and DB2. It has nothing like a
monopoly over the RDBMS market. To the extent that it does have a
position
are you using comstar or the old iSCSI target (iscsitadm) to provision targets?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 21 April, 2010 - Justin Lee Ewing sent me these 0,3K bytes:
So I can obviously see what zpools I have imported... but how do I see
pools that have been exported? Kind of like being able to see deported
volumes using vxdisk -o alldgs list.
'zpool import'
/Tomas
--
Tomas Ögren,
Hi Justin,
Maybe I misunderstand your question...
When you export a pool, it becomes available for import by using
the zpool import command. For example:
1. Export tank:
# zpool export tank
2. What pools are available for import:
# zpool import
pool: tank
id: 7238661365053190141
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Bayard Bell
buffer.g.overf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Martin,
This is a fundamental misstatement of Oracle's position as a software vendor
prior to acquiring Sun. Oracle faces considerable competition from sources
such as MS SQL Server and DB2. It has nothing
On 04/22/10 04:25 AM, Michael Kerpan wrote:
I was shocked to find that the drivers for all sorts of storage and
network adapters (including for pretty standard stuff like the Adaptec
Ultra320 SCSI cards and Broadcom wired network cards) that have been
supported by open drivers in Linux and *BSD
On 04/22/10 06:59 AM, Justin Lee Ewing wrote:
So I can obviously see what zpools I have imported... but how do I see
pools that have been exported? Kind of like being able to see
deported volumes using vxdisk -o alldgs list.
zpool import, kind of counter intuitive!
--
Ian.
All,
The best model to look at IMHO is redhat/fedora. This was the initial
proving ground of opensource (otherwise known as: how do we make money from
something we give away?) Furthering that: CentOS.
OpenSolaris is dead, Long live OpenSolaris!
I always prefer action to reaction.
And please
Waiting
Why no any office news about Opensolaris ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 22/04/2010 00:13, john wrote:
Waiting
Why no any office news about Opensolaris ?
Because, like every other time people have asked, it's not ready yet.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Oracle Corporation, Ireland
http://www.osnews.com/story/23181/Oracle_Starts_Charging_90_USD_Per_User_for_ODF_Plugin
Solaris 10 90-day evaluation
No security patch downloads for free
ODF plugin $90 (100 min)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
On 04/22/10 11:39 AM, bsd wrote:
http://www.osnews.com/story/23181/Oracle_Starts_Charging_90_USD_Per_User_for_ODF_Plugin
Solaris 10 90-day evaluation
No security patch downloads for free
ODF plugin $90 (100 min)
And the relevance of a windoze plugin to OpenSolaris is?
--
Ian.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:39 PM, bsd mascotgr...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.osnews.com/story/23181/Oracle_Starts_Charging_90_USD_Per_User_for_ODF_Plugin
Solaris 10 90-day evaluation
No security patch downloads for free
ODF plugin $90 (100 min)
I think we've all exhausted the subject of
Relevance?
The plugin used to be free, just like Solais 10 and patches.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I merely posted a link to an article and refrained from saying anything about
Oracle.
If I dared to say anyting about what I think about what Oracle has done so far
regarding Solaris 10, patches, the plugin, and what I think they'll do with
OpenSolaris, then I'd have pitchforks thrown at me.
Title: signature
You miss the point. This is a discussion list about OpenSolaris. Not
about a Microsoft Office Plugins. Not about Solaris. Not about Solaris
patches. The only reason to post this stuff (even without comment)
would be to sow FUD or dissention.
Quite honestly I'm getting sick of
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Using an Osol b 133 nfs server. When working from a linux client I
sometimes see files like: .nfs2def0002
.nfs2f6b0001
Appear on the filesystem as I'm working...
AuroraUX currently is based on dragonflybsd kernel . But their tools are
written in ada so it's no problem to port them again to opensolaris or other
kernel .
A person from aux project marino longer releasing gnat compiler for osol , so
partial basing aux on osol still existing .
--
This
CALM DOWN!
As I stated now MULTIPLE TIMES. Times are changing,
GET USED TO IT! Oracle is
a company (and you can proff it by yourself, if you
LOOK BACK at Oracle's
history of roadmaps and the likes), that ONLY
PUBLISHES roadmaps, once the
INKS ARE DRY!
Do you KNOW anything about the
are you using comstar or the old iSCSI target (iscsitadm) to provision
targets?
I'm using zfs set shareiscsi=on to confugure the logical units and COMSTAR for
the rest on the OpenSolaris side. The targets are initiated on Solaris 10 with
iscsiadm.
This thing was humming right along and all
Back in May 2008, there was a question on desktop-discuss asking whether
Solaris sendmail could be configured as an SASL auth client. The answer
from John Beck was no, because [of] some issues with Solaris' libsasl
implementation that are preventing this work from moving forward.
So my
56 matches
Mail list logo
