> What actually bothers me is that this has NOT been a
> Gabby Goose section, at least not until recently.
> And, no, not all "People have to understand" that
> this is not a technical list. *You* understand it
> to be a not technical list and it is quite
> disingenuous, if not dangerous, to assum
> > When I compared the two files with md5sum on each
> > side, I got different checksums.
> > I did so a split of the file to 5 GB parts and
> compared:
> >
> > Solaris:
> ...
> > 199d15f5204c14a97d29f86b14cd154b cpartad
>
> > Linux:
> ...
> > 0509b68893216f894ee394c0ab212cd2 cpartad
>
> You
On 15/07/2010 22:47, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
IMHO, The Oracle/Sun provided OpenSolaris reference distribution (henceforth
referred to as Indiana to avoid confusion) has done the community a disservice,
in the sense that it has prevented a community from producing something itself.
All the oth
Stephan Ferraro wrote:
> What scp should do is to do a full md5sum of the files on each side:
> 1. One time calculating the md5sum before sending the file
>
Could you make .torrent file for first file , publish it in Bit Torrent
client and then start download into the Dir on target machine with
> Stephan Ferraro wrote:
> > What scp should do is to do a full md5sum of the
> files on each side:
> > 1. One time calculating the md5sum before sending
> the file
> >
> Could you make .torrent file for first file , publish
> it in Bit Torrent
> client and then start download into the Dir on ta
On 7/16/2010 4:32 AM, Stephan Ferraro wrote:
Stephan Ferraro wrote:
What scp should do is to do a full md5sum of the
files on each side:
1. One time calculating the md5sum before sending
the file
Could you make .torrent file for first file , publis
> Just out of curiosity what firmware version do you
> have on the network card from dell? It looks like
> people with the 4.x version are not experiencing the
> errors, but 5.x people are.
>
> do dmesg|grep bnx and look for the following line:
> Jun 22 08:23:43 ipaapp bnx: [ID 995108 kern.info]
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Mark Martin
> wrote:
>> Create a website and forums to allow the community to reorganize
>> itself without the shadow of a hollow and unsupported charter.
>
> So the OGB would have to violate its own rules a
Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Obviously the issue the community has is that we've never had the ability to
> produce the distribution itself. We don't have the ability to build all the
> packages that go into the IPS repo, nor produce the Live CD, nor do we have
> an installer. And of course, findin
Rather than all the negativity that's been going around, let's focus
on the positive things:
1. We still have the code, including code that's MUCH more recent than
the last public binary build.
2. There are companies like Nexenta that might be able to help
maintain OpenSolaris, even if Oracle deci
> You should be able to build the LiveCD using the
> distribution constructor, if
> you had a complete set of packages (so you can do
> this for 134 now, but not
> yet for later builds). I also don't understand why
> you say you have no
> installer when the Caiman project installers are all
> ful
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Peter Tribble dot tribble at gmail dot com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Mark Martin
> wrote:
> >> Create a website and forums to allow the community
> to reorganize
> >> itself without the shadow of a hollow and
> unsupported charter.
> >
> > So
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Joerg Schilling <
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
> > joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
> > > The problem is that Sun/Oracle did already fork and changed things
> without
> > > asking the comunity whether this to b
People seem to keep asking what Oracle has done for them lately.
It might be an interesting exercise to look at it from their point of view.
What do they get out of engaging the community? That's what someone
(maybe the OGB, who knows) may well have to be prepared to spell out
if/when they talk t
Hi, Peter!
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Mark Martin
> wrote:
> >
> > I submit to you that just as important, if not MORE important, is to
> > wean the "community" off of Oracle's infrastructure and process.
>
> Not just that, but weanin
Hi,
Can the function threadp() be used in a kernel driver to get the current
kernel thread and the associated CPU Id?
Thanks,
Shank
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alpha testers? Beta testers? Sounds like a missed revenue opportunity to
marketing. Otherwise, if they're not willing to pay, why should we spend time
and engineering man hours to support such a program?? Testers? Bleh, who needs
'em???
National Cyber Alert System
[i]"If that proves ineffective we will consider other measures such as
putting the list into moderation or shutting it down entirely."[/i]
Due to this message by Oracle, I have created a new, unmoderated, emergency
backup list on freelists.org just in-case of this worst case scenario:
http://ww
OpenSolaris seems to be misspelled in that web site, just wanted to let you
know
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Fixed. :D
I am a little dyslexic. ;)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Oracle can use Opensolaris to focus attracting future young solaris
admins/dev/etc like they already do with java
because opensolaris will not rot their brain like windows:-)
http://java.sun.com/new2java/learning/young_developers.jsp
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Just for your info you have an RS880 integrated video card (HD4200). You will
have to ask the others on here about getting it to work at your desired
resolution, but it is a graphics card that released after 2009.06 was
published. I would try to use the latest dev distro 2010.b134 from genunix.o
On 07/16/10 12:20 PM, adidas wrote:
here is Xorg.0.log
Please help in setting up the proper resolution.
You are using build 108 with an ATI Radeon HD 4200.
It is falling back to the VESA driver which has restrictions
on what resolutions are offered.
What happens with build 134?
__
is there a way i can extract the default blue desktop wallpaper and login
splash image from the 2009.06
liveCD.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 07/16/10 07:18 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
...
Thanks again for this feedback. Do you know if the SVR4->IPS conversion tool(s)
are publicly available/open source?
The mass import tool is in the pkg(5) gate here:
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/pkg/gate/src/util/distro-import/
...
On 07/16/10 08:38, Shank wrote:
Hi,
Can the function threadp() be used in a kernel driver to get the current
kernel thread and the associated CPU Id?
Thanks,
Shank
Yes, threadp returns a pointer to the current thread
remember that threads migrate between CPUs w/o warning; any
reference
You are correct. I bought it last march only. Thanks for replying.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> I redownloaded the file cpartad and compared it with
> "cmp -l" with the old file:
> $ cmp -l cpartad cpartad.old
> 4962108197 271 371
>
> $ bc
> ibase=10
> obase=2
> 271
> 1
> 371
> 101110011
>
> It seems that 5 bits are wrong of the 23GB file transfer.
The differences reported by cm
Jürgen Keil wrote:
> > I redownloaded the file cpartad and compared it with
> > "cmp -l" with the old file:
> > $ cmp -l cpartad cpartad.old
> > 4962108197 271 371
> >
> > $ bc
> > ibase=10
> > obase=2
> > 271
> > 1
> > 371
> > 101110011
> >
> > It seems that 5 bits are wrong of the 23
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> Jürgen Keil wrote:
>
>> > I redownloaded the file cpartad and compared it with
>> > "cmp -l" with the old file:
>> > $ cmp -l cpartad cpartad.old
>> > 4962108197 271 371
>> >
>> > $ bc
>> > ibase=10
>> > obase=2
>> > 271
>> > 1
>>
Brent Jones wrote:
> > But then TCP checksums should discover the problem
> Well if its getting read incorrectly from disk on the Linux side, it
> will be transmitted incorrectly as well. TCP will only checksum the
> transmission, which may not be at fault here.
Then it may be a defect power su
Hello,
On Ubuntu I had to manually change the x configuration because the card
wouldn't recognize the monitor frequencies automatically.
Once I added the monitor frequencies to the x configuration file then the gnome
control panel allowed to select the correct resolution.
I think you may have t
> The best of all worlds, IMHO, would be for us (the
> community) to build
> and maintain a website of our own that hosted a
> minimalist distro of
> our own, with IPS repos of our own, using only the
> master mercurial
> (and/or whatever) source repos mirrored from within
> Oracle.
> Explicitly NO
On 07/16/10 01:26 PM, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
...
I like the idea of a minimalist distro, backed by a robust IPS. This is
something which probably should have been started in the first place (instead
of the current IMHO impossible mess).
Now that you mentioned this great idea of putting togethe
Then your distro will be forked from the Oracle released sources and you'll
have created an extra hurdle for yourself to jump in recreating SVR4 package
prototypes since those are no longer present in the ON & X gates, and will
be removed from more of the source gates as more consolidations transit
> > The differences reported by cmp -l are in octal;
> > so this is actually a single bit error.
>
> But then TCP checksums should discover the problem
That bit could have fllipped both on the sending
or the receiving machine (before or after TCP is
used).
--
This message posted from opensolaris
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:26 PM, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> > The best of all worlds, IMHO, would be for us (the
> > community) to build
> > and maintain a website of our own that hosted a
> > minimalist distro of
> > our own, with IPS repos of our own, using only the
> > master mercurial
> > (and/o
Sorry to bring this thread up,again but I think I missed something. All I've
ever heard of was Public or Private cloud ??
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Another angle: Do either of the machines use non-ECC RAM? memtest+ may be in
order on both of them.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thanks Bart !
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
40 matches
Mail list logo
