> now i know how to do auto-snapshot on opensolairs.
> Can anybody tell me if opensolairs has any tool to
> implement CDP?
Continuous data protection?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@o
> now i know how to do auto-snapshot on opensolairs.
> Can anybody tell me if opensolairs has any tool to
> implement CDP?
> thx a lot.
By what definition? AFAIK, the extreme definition
implies being able to restore to any single completed write
operation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>> now i know how to do auto-snapshot on opensolairs.
>> Can anybody tell me if opensolairs has any tool to
>> implement CDP?
>> thx a lot.
>
> By what definition? AFAIK, the extreme definition
> implies being able to restore to any sin
On 23/07/2010 03:33, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
I don't know, but probably more people contributed to
SFE and/or
/contrib in the last couple of years than to
Blastwave.
Without getting into pointless comparisons (I've used both),
the problem I have with /contrib is
the huge bottleneck that
Hello,
I'm trying to find the technical contact(s) for the OSOL mailing lists,
I've been having quite a few issues with bounced email from this list
(and other OSOL lists), and checking our mail server logs it is always
because of DomainKey (DKIM) rejection.
Believe it might have something
Looking at the fact, that OVM is free, and has a way better graphical
management system, and also comes with already predefined "Images", I don't
see that many problems.
Who would really be using ZFS in the Dom0, if you build bigger environments?
You would place the binaries/images on some network
I am one of those approvers.
Last I looked I had at least commented on anything mentioned in both SJ-Discuss
and Porters-Discuss as ready for review. I will review my emails, but unless
some have come in over the last week, there are none that have not been either
approved (with or without my v
On Jul 23, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Daniel Taylor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to find the technical contact(s) for the OSOL mailing lists,
>
> I've been having quite a few issues with bounced email from this list (and
> other OSOL lists), and checking our mail server logs it is always because of
Hi Peter,
GNU/kFreeBSD relates moreso to the Nexenta community (OpenSolaris kernel/Ubuntu
(Debian) userland) - which also is known as GNU/Solaris.
To help create the next community distro, I'd talk to Nexenta. Take a look at
Nexenta Core Platform 3.0 RC2 and see what can be improved from it.
Th
If a community-friendly spinoff is going to spinoff, I hope the mailing list
for that is created before the deadline when Oracle decides to terminate the
Opensolaris community.
Is somebody working to create a community distro mailing list?
Personally, I want this mailing list back, for peop
Apparently I missed the memo the Oracle was dropping this site.
If it turns out I didn't miss the memo, and this is something you are
completely making up, please stop. This is the type of stuff that gets posted
on slashdot then I have to go around the office and explain that it's just
someone
Hello,
VLC packaging is handled over in desktop-discuss.
For DVD playback, we use VLC and Mplayer (people like a few choices).
VLC 0.8.6/1.1.1 and Mplayer 1.0.0 were ported for Solaris 10 and OSOL 2009.06.
Check the VLC spec-file for recent updates to v1.1.1. Some changes may take
advantage of
A Hettinger wrote:
> Apparently I missed the memo the Oracle was dropping this site.
>
> If it turns out I didn't miss the memo, and this is something you are
> completely making up, please stop.
Oracle has made no announcements of ending opensolaris.org.
Oracle has announced that the separate
On 07/22/10 04:24, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Update 10 ? Really ?
The marketing people at ORacle are worse than the ones at Sun. We have no clue
when an update is coming or a damn thing but at least there are readme files
that leak out from time to time.
I don't understand your point. Hasn't it
On 07/22/10 05:56 PM, Jason wrote:
At a previous job most of their Sparc systems were upgraded from
Solaris 2.6->8->10 via live upgrade. Obviously new systems got the
latest standard, and not every system that went from 2.6->8 was still
around to do the 8->10 upgrade, but at one point we had aro
On 07/22/10 14:56, Jason wrote:
I suspect they would be quite disappointed (to put it mildly) if there
is no way to do something similar (at least an installer that can run
in an older version to lay down the bits in unused space).
The following worked for me to migrate development build server
My system crashed while deleting a zfs volume and went into an infinite reboot
loop. Suspecting a problem with ZFS, I booted from the LiveCD to try to
identify the issue. I tried to import one of the pools called backup
zpool import -f backup
The system crashed almost immediately. Is there some
There was, however, threat of moderating, and/or discontinuing the list as
disciplinary measures as part of select interpretation and application of the
site's TOS. To which someone on list did respond by setting up a list at Free
Lists so as to as least have an archive. Mayhaps that was what
A reminder that we *do* have a distribution community here, with a
distribution-discuss alias that is a good place to hold "community
distro" conversations...
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/distribution-discuss
-John
___
opensolaris-d
Symptoms:
1. System remains pingable
2. When trying to ssh in terminal hangs after entering pass
3. At the console terminal hangs after entering pass
4. Problem persists after disabling snapshots/compression/dedup
Solution:
Hard reboot (A+F1 does not work)
Configuration:
Supermicro Mobo
24 x 2
Do you have autofs turned on. Sounds like it is hanging when attempting to
mount a automounted filesystem.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
You would have better luck posting this to the zfs list.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Break the mirror
move the disk over to the other server
create a new zpool using that disk
zfs send | ssh zfs receive
bring over the other disk and add as a mirror.
Pop open a beer and smile.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolar
Thanks, John. I'd been checking in on that from time to time but it didn't
seem like much discussion was going on following the mentioning of such at
governing board meeting a while back. You're indeed correct that that would be
a good place for such discussion. I assumed, perhaps erroneously
If a community-friendly spinoff is going to spinoff, I hope the mailing list
for that is created before the deadline when Oracle decides to terminate the
Opensolaris community.
Is somebody working to create a community distro mailing list?
Personally, I want this mailing list back, for people w
Hi,
today, I put SchilliX-0.7.0 out.
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/SchilliX-0.7.0.iso.bz2
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/README.install
Changes since SchilliX-0.6.7:
- Updated to use OpenSolaris Nevada Build 130
- Updated to use new Schily
I did... I have now disabled it... But there was no evidence that this could be
the problem from the log files... I will keep the thread updated re: this
action.
thanks!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Cool;)
My test box was just about to get fresh install of FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE, but
I'll take Schillix for a quick test spin first.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
thanks. I never tried previously the distro, but I will install this into one
of my test
machines. Is star part of the distro ? Hope so :)
Would be nice to have a list somewhere what we get as plus on top of build130,
all tools.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
P.S.; Joerg, did I miss it or are there no md5 hashes for this?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 07/24/10 03:48 AM, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On 07/22/10 14:56, Jason wrote:
I suspect they would be quite disappointed (to put it mildly) if there
is no way to do something similar (at least an installer that can run
in an older version to lay down the bits in unused space).
The following wor
Hi,
Did a few quick tests under VirtualBox (for now).
The 64 bit version did not play well, showing unresolved symbols and dropping
to recovery console.
The 32-bit version was OK, though:
# uname -a
SunOS unknown 5.11 schily130 i86pc i386 i86pc
# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232
On 07/23/10 14:23, Ian Collins wrote:
I guess that's with an older or same ZFS version not newer in order to
be able to zfs send the filesystem. It could work for recent Solaris 10
updates as well, assuming there's another update with a zfs upgrade.
When I did this I migrated systems from neva
> On b134 + 190.53 the playback will be choppy.
> Update the driver to 256.35 in a new BE (changing only
> the NVIDIA driver) and the playback will be smooth.
Yes, with 256.35 drivers everything works fine now. Thanks!
--
Best regards, Aleksey Cheusov.
__
--- On Fri, 7/23/10, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> From: Joerg Schilling
> Subject: [osol-discuss] SchilliX-0.7.0 ready for testing
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org, distribution-disc...@opensolaris.org
> Date: Friday, July 23, 2010, 3:52 PM
> Hi,
>
> today, I put SchilliX-0.7.0 out.
>
>
On 07/24/10 09:47 AM, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On 07/23/10 14:23, Ian Collins wrote:
I guess that's with an older or same ZFS version not newer in order to
be able to zfs send the filesystem. It could work for recent Solaris 10
updates as well, assuming there's another update with a zfs upgrade.
"C. Bergström" wrote:
> Did you pull the libc work from Garrett and drop that on there?
No, I just created a halfway clean base for starting with the emancipation
work.
> Which compiler did you use to build onnv-gate?
OS-12.1
> What are you doing for c++ and are the binaries from Solaris/Open
Ken Gunderson wrote:
> Cool;)
>
> My test box was just about to get fresh install of FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE, but
> I'll take Schillix for a quick test spin first.
It still has no GDM and an old version of Xorg I compiled in late 2005.
I hope that someone will compile a recent Xorg and GNOME. It ma
Stefan Parvu wrote:
> thanks. I never tried previously the distro, but I will install this into one
> of my test
> machines. Is star part of the distro ? Hope so :)
Star-1.5.1 is also available from Blastwave.
The star on SchilliX has one new feature:
1) create a meta data only archive with st
Ken Gunderson wrote:
> P.S.; Joerg, did I miss it or are there no md5 hashes for this?
See the file README.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work
On 07/24/10 10:40 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ken Gunderson wrote:
Cool;)
My test box was just about to get fresh install of FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE, but
I'll take Schillix for a quick test spin first.
It still has no GDM and an old version of Xorg I compiled in late 2005.
I hope that
Why? IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed and
decidedly not FOSS manner. Moreover, interestingly enough, the most popular,
by far, thing to come out of Open Solaris is Nexenta, which is most definitely
not IPS based. And ironically enough, using something more familiar
My workstation is not on a UPS and experienced a hard-shutdown the other day
due to a commercial power outage. It booted up cleanly afterwards; however, my
NIC is does not seem to be functional unless 'snoop' is running. I've tried
setting a static IP, using DHCP, triple-checked the subnet mask,
On 07/23/10 15:28, Ian Collins wrote:
That's right, but I don't think you can specify the zfs or zpool version
to the installer (an RFE maybe?) so the root pool will always be the
latest version.
you should be able to create an empty BE in a down-rev pool (with pkg
image-create, as discussed i
This is an idea, but SchilliX (or a fork of it) could remain a pure
server-oriented core distro (without X or desktop cruft). The desktop stuff
could come by way of IPS integration and/or CSW/SFW/other packages...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
On 07/23/10 04:41 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
Why? IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed and
decidedly not FOSS manner.
Sorry, but that's simply not true.
The pkg(5) project has been one of the few projects that is actually
very open. It was the first to use defect.open
I haven't seen this specific problem before, but have you tried things like
touch /reconfigure and reboot, or unplumb the interface and reconfigure/reboot:
ifconfig e1000g0 unplumb
touch /reconfigure
init 6
You may or may not need to replumb after this with "ifconfig e1000g0 plumb".
Otherwise
On 07/24/10 01:23 PM, Ken Mays wrote:
This is an idea, but SchilliX (or a fork of it) could remain a pure
server-oriented core distro (without X or desktop cruft). The desktop stuff
could come by way of IPS integration and/or CSW/SFW/other packages...
The kernel distribution for Blastwave
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Stefan Parvu wrote:
> Interesting. Do you have any comparative numbers between
> OSOL and others: RHAT, Ubuntu for instance ?
>
> I had the impression SMF did improve things. As I read your post
> it seems, sometimes in past but not anymore ... why is that ?
> Pro
Ken, et al,
> IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed and decidedly
> not FOSS manner.
What shoving? It seems to me that those of you who are wailing and
moaning that you want a version of OpenSolaris with SVr4 packages are
conspicuous by the absence of an OpenSolaris deri
50 matches
Mail list logo
