Eric
Thank you, that is definitely the starting point.
Once we have the driver's context structure pointer,
to dump it out will i have to implement a mdb
extension (Chapter 10 in mdb reference) to dump the
fields of this context structure?
agree, the driver's internal structure is part of
I did (finally) manage to figure out where all the space went: various
VirtualBox snapshots, variously buried within ZFS snapshots, took up tens of
gigs of space. Once those were all merged and cleaned up, my disk is back to
happy state, with about 30 GB free on a 60 GB disk. Thanks for all of
No reason to apologize; you guys have been SO helpful to me, getting started
with OpenSolaris over the past year. In the event, the system is working fine.
I have a 8-port Dell SAS 6i/R controller, but the default cable set for this
machine only has six connectors (four on channel 0, and two on
Thank you, you have put me on the right track. And yes, custom mdb modules are
not really what i was looking for.
I do appreciate your help!
-Shank
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
The short answer, AFAIK, is yes, these are the only page sizes you can
use. You cannot select arbitrary sizes and use them at will.
Here is some detail:
The page size support table in the kernel is hw_page_array[] and is
populated for the x86 by page_coloring_init() in i86pc/vm/vm_machdep.c
most OpenSolaris users today have no idea what ON is
Indeed, I had to (google) search to find out what ON is - to understand
better what Illumos project is all about.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
I think this may be important to solaris
customers:)
excerpt:
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. PT Live Webcast
Join John Fowler, Executive Vice President, Systems,
for a live update on the strategy and roadmap for
Oracle’s Sun servers, storage and complete
I just returned from a short trip. So what was the conclusion and what are the
news
about Oracle Systems Strategy Update ? Something new ? How about
Solaris/OpenSolaris ?
thanks,
Stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
I just returned from a short trip. So what was the
conclusion and what are the news
about Oracle Systems Strategy Update ? Something
new ? How about
Solaris/OpenSolaris ?
thanks,
Stefan
news as requested;)
Oracle Details Upcoming Solaris 11 Release
excerpt:
quotes from presentation:
thanks.
stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
news as requested;)
Oracle Details Upcoming Solaris 11 Release
excerpt:
quotes from presentation:
We have a large new version of Solaris coming out in 2011 called Solaris 11,
John Fowler, Oracle's executive vice president of systems, told InternetNews.com
Fowler said that quite a bit of
it will probably be tuned for Database and Servers. Oracle may well remove
most desktop and laptop functionality, after all, it's not required and makes
support much harder.
Fowler added that Oracle will continue to invest in its open source
communities. That said he noted that Oracle really
On 10 Aug 2010, at 21:22, Paul Gress wrote:
Also, if I read in between the lines for this statement Solaris 11 will be a
superset of what is in Opensolaris, it say's to me, Oracle is not open with
Opensolaris any more. There will likely be proprietary extensions added not
in
I am trying to see the impact of different memory allocators on multi-threaded
workloads on my AMD machine running OpenSolaris 2009.06. I successfully used
libmtmalloc and libumem, however, it is giving core dump (through SEG fault)
when I used libhoard_32.so. However, I didn't get any errors
On 08/11/10 08:22 AM, Paul Gress wrote:
Forgive me if I don't get excited. But thats for Solaris 11, for all
we know, based on Larrys expectations, it will probably be tuned for
Database and Servers. Oracle may well remove most desktop and laptop
functionality, after all, it's not required
On 08/10/10 16:22, Paul Gress wrote:
Also, if I read in between the lines for this statement Solaris 11
will be a superset of what is in Opensolaris, it say's to me, Oracle
is not open with Opensolaris any more. There will likely be
proprietary extensions added not in Opensolaris. Basically I
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Martinez
it will probably be tuned for Database and Servers. Oracle may well
remove most desktop and laptop functionality, after all, it's not
required and makes
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Martinez
it will probably be tuned for Database and Servers. Oracle may well
remove most desktop and laptop functionality, after all, it's not
required and makes
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
#3 It does not make sense to discontinue development of opensolaris. Some
day they'll have to make a solaris 12, you know. But they're diverting
development away from opensolaris right now, to make *damn* sure they
release solaris 11 this year.
My calender still
On 08/10/10 11:45 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Isn't this all what I've said right along? It's the only thing that makes
sense:
#1 Solaris is extremely out of date w.r.t. opensolaris. Oracle needs to
release a commercially viable updated solaris while they still have an edge
over BTRFS and
Update- i want to add that it seems Mr. Fowler has confimerd that Oracle
stopped developing new servers around AMD CPUs and will use Intel CPUs only,
looks like a move from Jobs playbook;)
excerpt:
In the interview, Fowler confirmed earlier reports that Oracle has stopped
developing servers
21 matches
Mail list logo
