Re: [osol-discuss] Tor for opensolaris

2010-09-06 Thread Ghee Teo
On 09/ 5/10 07:15 PM, John Thompson wrote: Is there an opensolaris package for tor (the onion router)? I've tried this: # pkg install SUNWtor Creating Plan /pkg: install: The following pattern(s) did not match any packages in the current catalog. Try relaxing the pattern, refreshing and/or

Re: [osol-discuss] Doc for build upgrade

2010-09-06 Thread Rob McMahon
On 02/09/2010 16:25, Ali Bahrami wrote: I've just been trying this, and it all went without a hitch up to the point where you're supposed to reboot into 145. I have no errors, and I'm in the new boot environment: os-devel_145 NR / 86.05G static 2010-09-02 11:42 but uname still says snv_134,

Re: [osol-discuss] Asterisk

2010-09-06 Thread Brian Ruthven - Solaris Network Sustaining - Oracle UK
You'll probably have better luck on the dtrace-discuss list for the Dtrace part of your query. However, I can offer this: It is my experience is that not all header files are suitable for consumption by the D preprocessor. You may have to manually extract the definitions you want (I'm

[osol-discuss] Is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork?

2010-09-06 Thread David Blake
Hello, is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork? -- David Blake, IT Consultant ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] Is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork?

2010-09-06 Thread David Blake
Hello, is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork? -- David Blake, IT Consultant ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork?

2010-09-06 Thread Gary Driggs
On Sep 6, 2010, at 6:36 AM, David Blake wrote: is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork? What exactly are you looking for? A fully baked distribution based on Illumos? Have you read through the FAQ, looked at Schillix, NexentaCore, etc? If there's something important missing

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris cancelled, to be replaced with Solaris 11 Express

2010-09-06 Thread Orvar Korvar
IBM has publicly said that they are phasing out AIX in favour of Linux. AIX will be killed. IBM has said that officially. Development pace is slowing down. IBM is shifting more resources to Linux. I wouldnt bet on AIX in the long term. On the other hand, Solaris has a far larger user base

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris cancelled, to be replaced with Solaris 11 Express

2010-09-06 Thread Robert Milkowski
On 29/08/2010 23:34, usafverteran wrote: Does Solaris 10 have Active Memory Expansion? Does Solaris 10 have Workload Manager? yes, and yes. Both were available even before Solaris 10. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris cancelled, to be replaced with Solaris 11 Express

2010-09-06 Thread Edward Martinez
11. Solaris has a bright future. i don't think so. Linux has been running solaris out of the server rooms for a long time, that is why in 2005 SUN decided to open up solaris and give solaris away freely hoping that would attract customers. from 2005 -2009 things did seem more promising

[osol-discuss] SchilliX-0.7.1i (Illumos based) is ready

2010-09-06 Thread Joerg Schilling
A missing dependency for svc:/network/ipsec/ipsecalgs:default was added to permit the service to come up reliably. Known issues: The i18n code was replaced by OSS and already supports more than the free bits from Oracle but the country tables are far from being complete. There is however

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris cancelled, to be replaced with Solaris 11 Express

2010-09-06 Thread usafverteran
Unix, meaning Solaris, AIX, HP-UX, have a market and are not rapidly decreasing as you allude to in your comment. This is a fallacy and more marketing gibberish than anything. Linux cannot hold a candle to AIX or Solaris on proprietary hardware and RAS features. AIX has had features (LPARs)

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris cancelled, to be replaced with Solaris 11 Express

2010-09-06 Thread Octave Orgeron
I would also argue that Solaris still has a strong presence in the enterprise space. There are plenty of tasks that are not suited to the relatively small foot-print of x86 equipment and require big-iron. Even Oracle RAC implementations that go the Linux route eventually find themselves with

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris cancelled, to be replaced with Solaris 11 Express

2010-09-06 Thread Octave Orgeron
Totally agree! I see more organizations struggling with Linux than they do with Solaris or AIX. You get what you pay for! *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Octave J. Orgeron Solaris Virtualization Architect and Consultant Web:

Re: [osol-discuss] Asterisk

2010-09-06 Thread Robert Milkowski
On 05/09/2010 02:46, Juan Damian Bernabe wrote: Hello everybody, Im running OSol 2009.06 snv_134 on an Intel x86 pc. Well, I can't get the saptel drivers to work. I've tried the instructions below but no success. This is the message that returns: ad...@server:/export~# cat sysrelease.d

Re: [osol-discuss] Tor for opensolaris

2010-09-06 Thread John Thompson
On 09/06/2010 01:18 AM, Gmail solarg wrote: On 09/ 6/10 05:00 AM, John Thompson wrote: Ok, fine. When I do that I am told checking for libevent directory... configure: WARNING: Could not find a linkable libevent. So I try: # pkg install libevent Creating Plan /pkg: install: The following

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris cancelled, to be replaced with Solaris 11 Express

2010-09-06 Thread Fabio Kaminski
dream, dream, dream, dream ... x86 is comming, and is taking large server share( and linux with it ), and the only Risc is growing up, is ARM because of the mobile market boom... Solaris will be another AIX, because is that what the company who owns it now, want it to become.. another