Glynn Foster glynn.fos...@oracle.com wrote:
(contrary to popular opinion, we didn't organize the
event just for
opensolaris.org folks)
Take a break, go fishing. There is plenty of time.
---Bob
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
To Register for this FREE event, please go to:
ttp://event.on24.com/r.htm?e=298093s=1k=12D718A68226
85EE6AD2390FC381A7AEpartnerref=opensolaris
Oh darn. I just installed Firefox 4.0 with the development help of Oracle and
after registration with on24.com it indicates that it is not a
I would very much like to see a SunRay tablet (with
or without keyboard).
SunPad anyone? (At least it sounds better than
OraclePad... ;))
There is a windows sun ray client (aka soft sun ray),
currently only for
windows 7. But with citrix et.al. and rdp/vnc from a
windows machine to
Just curious what is the basic plan for VPN solutions for Opensolaris or even
Solaris in general? What would Oracle recommend as a common solution in this
category that would include Solaris x86, and Solaris sparc? Open source or
proprietary as long as it has a roadmap that can work and is
Bob Palowoda wrote:
Just curious what is the basic plan for VPN
solutions for Opensolaris or even Solaris in general?
What would Oracle recommend as a common solution in
this category that would include Solaris x86, and
Solaris sparc? Open source or proprietary as long
as it has a roadmap
You (Bob Palowoda) wrote:
What are you doing with these WorkStations or
Desktops?
Are there production services running on them, or
are
they development and
desktop tools?
Because:
The Solaris 10 download includes a development
and
evaluation license. So
What are you doing with these WorkStations or
Desktops?
Are there production services running on them, or are
they development and
desktop tools?
Because:
The Solaris 10 download includes a development and
evaluation license. So,
anyone running Solaris 10 on laptops or desktops is
Bob Palowoda wrote:
On 4/18/2010 8:12 PM, Bob Palowoda wrote:
One of the things that folks are going to have
to
get
use to (that
includes us new Oracle folks) is that Oracle
generally does not talk
about it's plans for commercial offerings before
I have rather a basic question. Considering IPS is a core technology of
OpenSolaris distribution and is a key component of any future release of
Solaris for Oracle. Does Oracle plan to distribute their Oracle DB and other
supporting applications with IPS? If not is their a general statement
On 4/18/2010 8:12 PM, Bob Palowoda wrote:
One of the things that folks are going to have to
get
use to (that
includes us new Oracle folks) is that Oracle
generally does not talk
about it's plans for commercial offerings before
they
actually announce
product
There is more information here:
http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or
_Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?taxonomyId=3234
Is the hardware OEM's that supply the chips, controllers etc supporting
Oracle's support strategy?
---Bob
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Apparently this is a known bug:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bu
g_id=6932552
alan
Wow a lot of people are hitting this bug. Hopefully it's marked as a stopper.
---Bob
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Here's how I interpret all of this: I think
they're shifting some
percentage of developers from opensolaris to
solaris. Instead of letting
opensolaris lead the way, and trickle down with
open source contributions
to solaris ... Solaris will lead the way,
Jussi Nieminen wrote:
It makes me sad to see those red Oracle logos even
here on opensolaris.org webpages, but I suppose we
just have to get used to it.
But at least we now get to see the Sun logo on
Larry's fancy new sailing
boat! That'll probably give the logo more air time
than
On 01/ 5/10 12:19 PM, andrew wrote:
That's interesting - I guess you do need an on-disk
format for that. There are two obvious use cases for
a file-based package: 1 is to do an OS install, the
other is to just add packages to a system after you
download them. It is sometimes quicker to
On 12/31/2009 10:49 AM, Ron Halstead wrote:
Will there be a OpenSolaris Nevada sxce snv_130 or
is it dead?
Last I heard SXCE 130 was planned for release after
the Sun US
employees responsible for the release get back into
the office
next week. (Sun's US offices are closed for a
On 30/09/2009, at 5:06 PM, Che Kristo wrote:
I don't mind waiting longer for quality :-) IMHO it
should be 8
months as 6 months is too agressive, but i do
understand we are
somewhat beholden to the Gnome schedule
It's not just GNOME, but a wide variety of other
projects
Now that extended partitions are supported via PSARC/2006/379 which was
integrated in
build 119 are their plans to have the installer allowed to install on an
extended partition.
Note I don't think the arc case 2006/379 is public because it may have some
proprietary
information about extended
Ché Kristo wrote:
What do you say? Am I well researched? Could this
be
true? Does it make sense? SUN is loosing because
of
POLITICS?
I don't think your world view and mine even
remotely connect so I don't think I am able to
critique your analysis on its merits. I will say
I was out for the week around the 15th but who where the Sun Awards Winners?
It was to be announced the 15th but I may have missed the notice. Who where
the big winners and did they get there prizes yet?
---Bob
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I was out for the week around the 15th but who where the Sun Awards Winners?
It was to be announced the 15th but I may have missed the notice. Who where
the big winners and did they get there prizes yet?
---Bob
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
* andrew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I read on a previous post somewhere that the
menu-driven version of
Live Update - i.e. the lu command - doesn't wokr
with ZFS due to a
particular bug, but I can't locate the original
post. Doesanyone have
a link to the bug in bugs.opensolaris.org .
Ian Collins wrote:
Matthew Snyder wrote:
A little off topic, but I figure you guys use the
site and I see Dennis
around here often, so..
Anyone know whats up with blastwave.org? the
notice sounds legal;
probably means no official updates right now.
Anyone know anything?
Ian Collins wrote:
Matthew Snyder wrote:
A little off topic, but I figure you guys use the
site and I see Dennis
around here often, so..
Anyone know whats up with blastwave.org? the
notice sounds legal;
probably means no official updates right now.
Anyone know anything?
Why don't you use a Sun Ray and a Sun SPARC server?
Interesting is the Sun Ray software going to become a project in the future
for OpenSolaris?
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hi people,
Finally, I am able to run Oracle 10g on my
OpenSolaris installation. :-) But it is tricky and
here is how I did it:
1) I installed Solaris 10 (x86) on my another laptop.
Installed configured Oracle 10g on it successfully
in /export/home/oracle.
2) Now, on my acer laptop,
This is a bug in Samba on MacOS/X. I don't have
the
Apple radar number for it yet, but will post when I
do.
Meanwhile, here's an OpenSolaris CR to help track
this issue:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6710493
Why not log the bug in bugzilla to begin with? By putting
I'm just wondering, what am I giving up if I dump the
U10 w/
Solaris10?
Your under the bridge position.
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
If I only could find an application on my SXCE b72
x86 that could play those files...
I actually heard the files play on SXCE b72 x86. But I'm not from this planet
so your mileage may
very.
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
PS: Take a quick look at these two cost effective
systems, each with
4Gb of RAM built by Bob Palowoda at:
http://www.fiver.net/misc/solarisamdbox.html
Those machines looks good, except for the use of
Maxtor hard disks on the first one. I would
personally substitute Western Digital
When Solaris Express Developer Edition (SXDE) was
added to the Solaris Express Community Edition (SXCE)
disks, it was made the default entry on the boot
menu, even though it requires a minimum of 768MB of
memory, whereas Solaris Express Community Edition
only requires a minimum of 512MB of
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div
brdiv brI'm looking to build a raid
array consisting of up to 16 sata
drivers.brbrAre there any cards out there that
will work under OS that can handle upwards of
16?brbrbrThanks!br/div
/div___
You didn't mention
Steven Sim wrote:
Folks;
Today Sun BIG ADMIN website posted an article by
Lynne Thompson entitled
What's New in Patching
See
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/sundocs/articles/patch-wn.
jsp
Could somebody here elaborate more on the following
statement
.Now,
i find iconv.h both in /opt/csw/lib and
/usr/local/lib.
i didn't know how to add LD_LIBRARY_PATH .
is it edit /etc/profile,add line:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
i have add this,but no use.
I would advise not to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Rather set your LDFLAGS -L and -R
paths
Bob Palowoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i find iconv.h both in /opt/csw/lib and
/usr/local/lib.
i didn't know how to add LD_LIBRARY_PATH .
is it edit /etc/profile,add line:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
i have add this,but no use.
I would advise not to set
Ah this does sound encouraging. Though it's still
confusing why
the download page says Solarisx86 and points to a
Sparc version.
It did at one time point to x86 versions. But maybe
this an Adobe
web page problem.
I seem to remember it often (always?) had this
problem and
Solaris version of flashplayer 9 plugin seems to
have disappeared from the
Adobe d/l site:
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer9.html
Anyone knows anything about this? Thanks.
Near as I can tell Adobe seems to be in a state of
war with Solaris users.
Maybe Jonathan
On 24/06/07, W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Solaris version of flashplayer 9 plugin seems to
have disappeared from the Adobe d/l site:
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer9.html
Anyone knows anything about this? Thanks.
From:
Compiler by myself?!oh,it sounds too difficult to
me~
where can I find ClamAV for OpenSolaris X86?
Well he did say Blastwave, http://www.blastwave.org
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On 6/4/07, Alan Burlison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Given how negative this community is on Linux...
But when one looks literally *anywhere* else on
opensolaris.org besides
this
list one finds the complete opposite, namely,
flexibility, diversity,
Just not the reverse. Linux grub cannot boot
Solaris. Go figure.
haha. Are your changes to grub pushed upstream?
Upstream Grub. A novel concept indeed.
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
Many open source projects keep track of open/closed/in-progress status of bug
metrics. Is it reasonable for the next revision of boo to keep metrics of these
bug attributes between builds? That is all bugs that would affect opensolaris.
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Is project Indiana going to support Sunrays? Seems like it should as Sunrays
are
consider the prime client Sun platform.
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hey,
Just having a look at
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Developers_program
nyone thinking of porting OpenSolaris to this? Would
be a pretty fun project
for a bunch of people I think? [1].
I love slow news days with OpenSolaris as they tend to warp your mind.
---Bob
This message
Is 112.2o7.net aka 2o7.net and Omniture necessary for a good Opensolaris website
experience? I often find that sinking the site into a black hole speeds
things up and
even causes downloads to function.
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
RTL8110SC/RTL8169SC
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Approved: Gw3Zx
X-OpenSolaris-URL:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=116341tstart=0#116341
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
This
Is 112.2o7.net aka 2o7.net and Omniture necessary for
a good Opensolaris website
experience? I often find that sinking the site into
a black hole speeds things up and
even causes downloads to function.
Correction I should have said: sunopensolaris.112.207.net
Than again 2o7.net has
Heads up:
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2007
/tc20070430_095211.htm
I've always been fascinated that the PR machine always used the GPL/Linux
announcements every time the stock takes a hit. And than the stock goes
lower. I recommend the Rocky and Bullwinkle
This is for review.
goto : http://www.blastwave.org/docs/index.html
select doc BLS-0061
A lot of the pages were written when I was getting
tired and there will
be errors. At the very least some dry humour and
possibly rambling.
The topic or index page is still being written. It
anyone else seen this on snv_61 ?
# Apr 7 19:06:53 mercury svc.startd[7]:
system/webconsole:console failed
fatally: transitioned to maintenance (see 'svcs -xv'
for details)
# svcs -xv
svc:/system/webconsole:console (java web console)
State: maintenance since Sat Apr 07 19:06:53
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/flag-days/pages/2007032801/
Might be helpful to give url's reachable outside the swan.
-
. Instructions for Manual set up:
http://fs.central/projects/zfsboot/zfsboot_manual_setup.html
^^
2. Instructions for
I know this might be a touchy subject but is it reasonable to close RFE's that
are more
than a year old with some evaluation? There are RFE that can last greater
than
5 to 10 years and it leaves the Open Solaris developers wondering what types of
evaluations or comments are going on in the
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 01:23 pm, Stefan Teleman
wrote:
This was one of the other suggestions made on the
ARC discuss list. My
primary concern about keeping both 2.0.x and 2.2.4
around (albeit
temporarily) is that it creates the possibility of
a huge disaster:
application X links
Project Proposal: Next Generation Web Stack
Summary
We would like to create an OpenSolaris project to
assume and enhance
the community and work originally created in Sun's
CoolStack project
as part of the CoolTools project. This project
will
assume all of
the CoolStack
i think it has something to do with the move to
modular Xorg, but i've been trying to run mplayer
on
both snv_59 (clean install from sxde DVD) and
opensolaris_b60 (bfu'd from 59). that package
always
worked fine on 57. i can start gmplayer and it
works
until i try and play a
I was reading Moinak Ghosh's blog about Belenix 0.6 improvements:
http://blogs.sun.com/moinakg/entry/belenix_dvd_with_netbeans_openoffice#comments
and I'm a bit interested in the application development futures in OpenSolaris.
He is including Netbeans 5.5 and Java EE Application Server 9.0 U1
Why would a Solaris developer go to an expensive
Java developers
onference to see novice sessions about Solaris?
---Bob
Quite on the contrary, I think this is a quite
matter-of-course move. Some Java developers have
been telling me that they could distinguish b/t a
Java app and
Hi,
I just completed a fresh install of the x86 version
of B59 on an IBM
Thinkpad A21p and there seems to be an issue with the
gnome startup.
When logging in as root or normal user it immediately
goes back to
the login window. Logging in using CDE works. I
started up in
Sorry for the broad distribution, but I wanted to
give the most people
the opportunity to comment and participate. Teresa
and I applied for,
and were granted, an OpenSolaris track during
JavaOne. The track will
take place on Monday May 7th (the day before JavaOne
officially begins)
at
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div
tt OpenSolaris Community,br
br
br
I would like to introduce to you phase two of (b.o.o)
bugs.opensolaris.org.
Needs more lipstick. :-)
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
Stephen Hahn wrote:
Not easily, no. I'll look at the moderation
idea, but the
subscribers only request contradicts the aims
of most legitimate
forum posters.
Another alternative would be to moderate the first
few posts from new
registrants. This should stop the spammers
Bill Moffitt wrote:
So, there's only one question left: what's going to
make those five people sitting around in somebody's
garage look around and, instead of coming to the
conclusion that they need a Windows server, come to
the obvious and irrefutable conclusion that they need
a
Ferrari 3400 768 MB RAM, 60 GB internal disk,
Wistro CM9 Atheros
chipset Mini-PCI card.
I'm using the non-developer selection from the grub
menu.
Right after selecting the installation type
(Interactive, jumpstart etc..)
The machine locks up completely.
Has anyone else seen this?
I found this sort of interesting:
http://cooltools.sunsource.net/coolstack/
Cool Stack is built using Sun Studio (TM) 11 Compiler using the -xO4 option
(SPARC version) and gcc with -O4 (x86 version) for high levels of optimization.
This results in anywhere between 30-200% performance
What happened to the desktop jive forum? For a while it got a java exception
error than nothing in the web jive forum. There was some good archive
information in that list.
Speaking of the Jive forums used for the OpenSolaris website. I notice that
Sunsolve and the support use Jive
When installing libxml2 which I got from xmlsoft.org
I got this problem on make command
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target
`xpath.lo'
Current working directory
/export/eder/libxml2-2.6.18
*** Error code 1
The following command caused the error:
set fnord
Hello,
I want to inform that there is no supported yet Intel
82562EZ Network Controller in Solaris.
This controller is on Intel D915PBL motherboard.
There is need to support it as soon as possible.
Do you think it should go into OpenSolaris also?
---Bob
This message posted from
I'd like to propose a project to enable and enhance
Solaris support for
shipping and future Intel processors and platforms.
As we are all aware of, Sun and Intel have formed an
alliance to make
Solaris the Unix operating system of choice on Intel
platforms. We
believe the only sensible
Hi, I was wondering if the /etc/release file should
be updated after all
patched have been applied to a system? I have
solaris 10 06/06 and I did
an smpatch update and successfuly applied all
patches. How do I know this
takes me up to 11/06 now?
If you bought a Sun service
Casper wrote:
I live in a community in which is perhaps not very
divers, but it
contains lawyers, real estate agent, brokers, actors,
photographers,
people who own their homes, people who rent, single
parent families,
single persons, unemployed, employed, self-employed.
These are all
Bob Palowoda wrote:
x86 hardware support has been steadily improving
over
the last couple of
years and the rate of improvement has accelerated
in
the past year. I
have only failed to install on one x64 system (and
I
have done a lot of
installs) and that was an HP DL380
this is, unfortunately, x64, not sparc.
For some reason they where talking about Sparc Solaris 10 on the first line.
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
this is, unfortunately, x64, not sparc.
For some reason they where talking about Sparc
Solaris 10 on the first line.
---Bob
Sorry I could have toke your comment about the patch not being sparc or your
trying to be politically correct and indicate you haven't purchased an x64 from
For x86/x64 users you might want to check out the flag days entry for direct
boot
coming up in build 57. It's a good heads up.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/flag-days/pages/2007011901/
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Peter Tribble wrote On 02/02/07 05:23,:
On 2/1/07, *Ben Rockwood* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While that would be handy, we already have a
good program in place,
its just buried. I refer to Bite Sized Bugs.
...
The idea here is that
Yes, because Sun employees are the majority of
engineers that understand and
can work with the code. A good majority of the
folks
outside of Sun have not
even pulled or looked at the sources. You don't
expect the engineers who have
been working on this code for man years to
Is there seriously no ident for solaris anymore???
This is going to be a BIG issue for me if there is
not. Help? Someone?
Been searching for three days now, and have yet to
find anything. All the usual suspects don't compile
properly with all sorts of errors.
Somebody did it on
S Destika wrote:
Do you have a specific device that is really
preventing you from using
Solaris/OpenSolaris?
About 8 different x86/64 boxes - and I am not alone
by any means. Only place where it works reasonably is
VMware. Has Sun any interest in fixing x86 hardware
support?
In our SunLabs/CTO organizational All-Hands meeting
this
morning I had the chance this morning to ask Rich
Green
(Sun's EVP/Software) about what Sun has learned in
the
last few years about licenses and open source,
especially
with the recent GPL'ing of Java and this OpenSolaris
thread.
Please find the links to SXCR Build 56 at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/on/.
- Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
What is the status of the Opensolaris Power PC port?
Is the project
still active? There were not any status reports or
updates in the last
months.
A better place for the question might be:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=5
or check out the ppc community pages:
On 1/29/07, Bob Palowoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the status of the Opensolaris Power PC
port?
Is the project
still active? There were not any status reports
or
updates in the last
months.
A better place for the question might be:
http://www.opensolaris.org
Back in the day when GNOME 2.0 from Sun shipped on a
beta CD, I recall that executables and libraries were
installed in /usr/gnome. This was consistent with
/usr/dt and other, more archaic windowing systems
such as /usr/openwin. Though when GNOME was released
and later bundled with Solaris
Bob Palowoda writes:
But for people who want to write their own
software,
they are
forced to choose between GPL'ing their code or
paying
money to
TrollTech.
Mixing different licenses in Solaris and
OpenSolaris. Who would have
thought that would ever happen
De Togni Giacomo wrote:
This is an important issue for this project.I
think,it should be cleared (eventually with
trolltech) before start the project.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
Bob Palowoda wrote:
De Togni Giacomo wrote:
This is an important issue for this project.I
think,it should be cleared (eventually with
trolltech) before start the project.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
On 1/17/07, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
John Sonnenschein wrote:
Following the official proposal guidelines, I'd
like to take this opportunity to propose that we
collaborate with the KDE e.V. and kde-core-devel in
order to integrate KDE as an
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Never could have ever imagined that this was going
to happen, but looks like it is:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2084284,00.asp?kc
=EWEWEMNL011507EP28A
Nothing is certain yet (to my knowledge), but I know
of at least
two CAB
Following the official proposal guidelines, I'd like
to take this opportunity to propose that we
collaborate with the KDE e.V. and kde-core-devel in
order to integrate KDE as an OpenSolaris project
+1
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Martin Bochnig wrote:
John Plocher wrote:
Am I missing something???
Yes.
This [ http://solaris.kde.org/ ]
is the URL for the KDE Solaris site at KDE, under
the kde.org domain,
sponsored, paid for and maintained by The KDE
Foundation [KDE e.V.].
It is completely
---
with a lot of messages in the /var/adm/messages file
(see below for a little extract)
--
---
Jan 5 20:41:43 d1501 genunix: [ID 387338
kern.notice] symbol
An update on my experiences with this hardware...
Learned of an IDR to fix S10U3 (11/06) from hanging
when probing the PCI-e
space. To use it you need to get a copy from Sun
(support), and build a new
distribution media DVD with the miniroot rebuilt with
the IDR. (An IDR is
Interim
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
This is a work in progress: PSARC 2006/379
tp://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2006
/)
The changes touch a lot of places both in Kernel
and Userland, in
ddition to changes to the installer. Code
review is ongoing at present.
gards,
What would the money be for? Volunteers don't get
paid for their time.
I'd be willing to donate money for a real bug database.
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Would the estimate be any shorter if we picked an
active Sun developer and put
him outside for the SWAN for week and see how he
coped? ;)
I'd volunteer myself, but I suspect it wouldn't
have the same impact as an ON
developer.
I think the impact would be equivalent; pain to
Aaron Seigo, Leader Developer for KDE Project was a
key note speaker at
FOSS.IN 2006. He visited the OpenSolaris stall and
spent some time with
us. He went back to Calgary and blogged about us.
Check out my blog for pictures and more details:
http://blogs.sun.com/josephgeorge
Aaron's
Hi, All
Sorry for my late on responding to this topic. I was
not aware that AHCI was discussed here in opensolaris
forum.
This project is almost finished and is under its
final test. Hopefully this driver could be putback by
the end of this year. In the first phase, AHCI driver
will
I've downloaded b51 and tried to upgrade my
workstation which is
currently running on b50 with no problems.
Motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-K8U with 3 GB RAM and an
AMD Athlon 64 3000+.
oot w/no debugging:
Interesting no comments on a panic.
---Bob
This message posted from
Bonnie Corwin mailed [3] with 2 updates to the Sun
Contributor Agreement (SCA), both
minor giving more freedom to companies registering
their employees. Along with
this, Bonnie posted details of the SCA FAQ.
3.
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-anno
I found this reading through the Slashdot thread
about GPLing Java and the potentially of GPLing
OpenSolaris.
Something inference about Sun taking a bribe from MS
to make OpenSolaris less 'free' or 'open'?
Anybody know anything about this or it the usual
FUD?
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
