dors use which the same components as well.
Illumos will hopefully be better about adding more hardware support.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ere was a second USB
drive plugged in.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
you can simply
add two more drives rather than enough to make up an additional vdev.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
; the 6 gbps card without drivers?
You will need drivers.
The Marvell SATA chips have been supported for a while in the base OS.
Some SAS 6G cards as well. Someone posted a really nice comparison of
supported cards and bus speeds a while back, it may be worth looking
for.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh..
river. You may need to
add the card to /etc/driver_aliases?
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
For those wanting more details, it's in a flag day from 2009/9/11:
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+on/2008091102
FreeNAS worked fine with the system and drives, which made for a nice
fallback plan.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freak
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Brandon High wrote:
> I recently installed a Seagate LP drive in an Atom ICH7 based system. The
> drive is showing up dmesg but not available in format. Is this a known
> problem? Is there a work around for it?
I just found an older thread where
I recently installed a Seagate LP drive in an Atom ICH7 based system. The
drive is showing up dmesg but not available in format. Is this a known
problem? Is there a work around for it?
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
able to the older BE.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
l OpenSolaris release.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Check the snv134 release notes. The warnings you saw are mentioned in them.
If you're doing a clean install, you may want to grab the b134 install CD
and start with that rather than upgrade from 111.
Sent from my Nexus One.
On Jun 5, 2010 10:49 PM, "Matt Connolly" wrote:
> I've just done a clea
Is it possible to use zones and xen or virtual box simultaneously on the
same host?
Sent from my Nexus One.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
> I scrubbed all my zfs pools, no problem detected. Everything seems to be
> working.
>
> Any idea of what is happening ?
Check your cabling.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
can set access via the sharenfs property. For instance,
# zfs set sharenfs=...@192.168.1.0/24 foo
will allow read/write access to the 192.168.1.0 subnet.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
higher),
AMD SB600 (or higher) or a Marvell 88SE912x based card.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ment after
installing the driver.
# beadm mount /c
.. install driver ..
# bootadm update-archive -R /c
> How to install it...? Im out of ideas..
The best bet is to use b134 from the /dev repository. It has a lot of
fixes, as well as the 3ware drivers.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
thing, I supposed it depends on what your requirements are.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
f a mirrored
root is missing) but I haven not encountered any other major bugs.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Ed Pate wrote:
> Does "TestPool" use dedup? If so, turn it off and try again.
Or compression. It turns out that /dev/zero compresses extremely well.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
openso
o problem.
Any idea on what's causing it? I suspect it's just that the flash is
too slow and something is timing out.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> Oh look ... snv_138 appears quite suddenly out of nowhere .. cool.
Any idea when it'll be on http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/ ?
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensola
Is there any documentation about what the pursue-latest property for pkg
does? I've noticed that it's set by default, but I can't find a description
of what it does.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discu
Is there a list of bugs in b132? I'd like to know if the sharesmb
name= bug has been fixed before upgrading.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
clients as well as Windows, then formD is a better
choice. This is just what I've gleaned from searching and reading up
myself. I'm not sure what formKC or formKD do differently.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
When in doubt, use brute force.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
is volume primarily shared out to Windows or Mac clients via
CIFS, you may want to set the 'casesensitivity' and 'normalization'
properties as well. Both of these can only be set when the filesystem
is created, too.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
Suspicion Breeds Confi
t the fan controls
working, or a configuration setting that needs to be changed?
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
Suspicion Breeds Confidence
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
BE with the new packages.
I can create a new package with:
# beadm create snv_118@"$(date)"
but how do I tell pkg to update the new BE? A command like:
# pkg install ent...@0.5.11-118
will update the current BE, which is not what I want.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
A
driver, but
I was hoping Sun had fixed the problem by now.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
6 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC
> Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> Use is subject to license terms.
> Assembled 14 November 2006
>
> /etc >uname -a
> SunOS sunqz04 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
This forum is for OpenSolaris. It is not a
go. Since it uses the ATA controller, there's nothing special
to do, it just looks like an hard disk.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812186038
-B
--
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The good is the enemy of the best." - Nietzsche
___
, which gave it an
eSATA port and a 5th internal SATA port, but I don't think that's what
you'd want.
> Also, how were you able to reach the conclusion that the 690G chipset is
> fully supported?
There have been a number of success stories posted by people using the 690G.
-B
You could use Partition Magic or similar software to shrink your
existing NTFS partition, then add a new Solaris UFS partition. I'm not
sure if there's a way to non-destructively shrink a BSD UFS partition.
-B
--
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The good is the e
thing no Change
I misunderstood you. I thought that Belenix had worked for you.
OpenSolaris supports the FAT file system, but not NTFS. It also
supports UFS, but I think Solaris's UFS is different than BSD's UFS2
and may not be able to read it. What filesystem is on your drives
currently?
igs of it Locked using an old windows Folder lock program?
If you weren't able to mount the file systems, then it's unlikely that
Folder Lock was the problem.
-B
--
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The good is the enemy of the best." - Nietzsche
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
tool will tell you for certain.
If it doesn't work in legacy mode, it's probably not going to work. If
you want to use the drives with OpenSolaris you'll have to use a PCI
controller.
-B
--
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The g
A-MV8 - 8 ports, about $100 online.
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/DAC-SATA-MV8.cfm
> I was hoping that the AMD 780G chipset would be supported, but according to
> this forum-posting
Look at a 690G based board - fully supported, and has 6x SATA connectors.
-B
--
it's not reacting quickly enough to the increase in memory
use.
-B
--
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The good is the enemy of the best." - Nietzsche
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
itten
there will use physical memory, or page out if required.
Also, could you sort the output by memory usage? "prstat -s rss" and
"prstat -s size" will sort by resident size or total image size.
-B
--
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The good is the enemy of
; use > 2GB of memory. Again heavy disk trashing, and I
> didn't had the impression that the arc cache did shrink enough
> to prevent that thrashing.
Again, what else was running, and what was the size of the ARC?
-B
--
Brandon
ing this for
Linux on the site.
I haven't tried this and I have no idea if it'll work, but it might
let you sneak around a MBR issue.
-B
--
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The good is the enemy of the best." - Nietzsche
___
opensol
ng the server up to 4GB or
8GB will probably smooth things out. Crucial has an 2GB kit for $105,
4GB for $300, or 8GB for $550.
-B
--
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The good is the enemy of the best." - Nietzsche
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
s consume
1.5GB of memory, you're limiting your performance.
MySQL with InnoDB performs better with a smaller buffer pool size on
ZFS, relying instead on the ZFS cache. Increasing the buffer pool size
and decreasing the ARC cache size is the exact opposite of what you
want to do.
-B
--
Brandon Hi
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Orvar Korvar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ive heard of people having problems with port multiplier? It isnt yet
> supported?
My bad, it looks like port multipliers aresupported in Opensolaris,
but not by the SATA controllers yet.
-B
__
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:27 PM, andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> New desktop motherboards don't have PCI-X slots, so yes - you would need to
> buy a server board to get a PCI-X slot.
>
> My question would be: is there not a PCI Express version of this card?
It doesn't look like there is one
Is there an up to date HCL for Open Solaris, or what will be added in
10u5? Both the sddtool and Sun's site seem out of date.
Thanks
-B
--
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The good is the enemy of the best." - Nietzsche
___
opensolaris-
45 matches
Mail list logo
